Commentary and Book Review of Middle Range Theories: Application to Nursing Research and Practice (5 th Edition) by Sandra J. Peterson and Timothy S. Bredow (2020),
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2021
Commentary and Book Review of Middle Range Theories: Application to Nursing Research and Practice (5 th Edition) by Sandra J. Peterson and Timothy S. Bredow (2020),
The author in this article provides a review of Peterson and Bredow’s 5th edition of Middle Range Theories: Application to Nursing Research and Practice. The author also shared some concerns and thoughts about the current status of nursing theory and middle-range theory.
BinfordL. R. (1977). General introduction. In BinfordL. R. (Ed.), For theory building in archaeology: Essays on faunal remains, aquatic resources, spatial analysis, and systemic modeling (pp. 1-10). Academic Press.
5.
ButcherH. K. (2004). Nursing’s distinctive knowledge base. In HaynesL.ButcherH. K.BoeseT. (Eds.), Nursing in contemporary society: Issues, trends and transition into practice (pp. 71-103). Prentice Hall.
ChinnP.KramerM. K. (2021). Knowledge development in nursing: Theory and process. Elsevier.
8.
CrosbyP. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. McGraw-Hill.
9.
DahnkeM. D.DreherH. H. (2016). Philosophy of science for nursing practice: Concepts and Application. Springer.
10.
DangD.DearholtS. (Eds.). (2018). Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: Model and guidelines. Sigma Theta Tau International.
11.
DemingW. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. The MIT Press.
12.
DonabedianP. (2005). Evaluating the quality of medical care, The Milbank Quarterly, 83, 691-729. (Reprinted from “Evaluating the quality of medical care,” 1966, The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44(3), 166-203.)
13.
FawcettJ. (2017). Analyzing conceptual models of nursing. Springer.
14.
ForslundP. (2004). MRT confidential (N. Tompkinson, Trans.). In FahlanderF.OestigaardT. (Eds.), Material culture and other things post-disciplinary studies in the 21st century (pp. 213-258). Elanders Gotab Vällingby.
15.
GardnerH. (2006). Five minds for the future. Harvard Business School Press.
16.
GraceP. J.WillisD. G.RoyC.JonesD. (2016). Profession at the crossroads: A dialogue concerning the preparation of nursing scholars and leaders. Nursing Outlook, 64, 61-70.
17.
JuranJ.M.GrynaF. M. (1988). Juran’s quality control improvement handbook (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
18.
KristonA.HarveyG.McCormackB. (1978). Enabling the implementation of evidence-based practice: A conceptual framework, Quality in Health Care, 7(3), 149-159.
19.
LenzE. R. (1996, May). Role of middle range theory for research and practice. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Sixth Rosemary Ellis Scholars’ Retreat, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
20.
LenzE. R. (1998a). The role of middle range theory for nursing research and practice. Part 1. Nursing Leadership Forum, 3, 24-33.
21.
LenzE. R. (1998b). The role of middle range theory for nursing research and practice. Part 2. Nursing Leadership Forum, 3, 62-66.
22.
LiehrP.SmithM. J. (1999). Middle range theory: Spinning research and practice to create knowledge for the new millennium. Advances in Nursing Science, 21, 81-91.
23.
MalinskiV. M. (2017). Pregnant with promise for far too long: Time to deliver. Nursing Science Quarterly, 30, 38-43.
24.
McEwenM.WillsE. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing. Wolters Kluwer.
25.
MertonR. K. (1949). On sociological theories of the middle range. In MertonR. K. (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 39-53). Simon & Schuster, The Free Press.
26.
MertonR. K. (1968). On sociological theories of the middle range. In MertonR. K (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 39-69). Free Press.
MorseJ. (2017). Analyzing and conceptualizing the theoretical foundations of nursing. Springer.
29.
NelsonJ. W. (2017). A future without nursing conceptual frameworks. International Journal for Human Caring, 21(2), 53.
30.
ParseR. R. (2010). Nursing education: Issues reminiscent of the last century. Nursing Science Quarterly, 23(4), 273.
31.
PetersonS. J.BredowT. S. (2020). Middle range theories: Application to nursing research and practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
32.
PinkD. H. (2005). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. The Berkley Publishing Group.
33.
RoyS. C. (2013). Generating middle range theory: From evidence to practice. Springer.
34.
SieloffC. L.FreyM. A. (2007). Middle range theory development using King’s conceptual system. Springer.
35.
SmithM. C. (2020). Nursing theories and nursing practice (5th ed.). F. A. Davis.
36.
SmithM. J.LiehrP. R. (2018). Middle range theory for nursing. Springer.
37.
StetlerC. (1994). Refinement of the Stetler/Marram model for application of research findings to practice. Nurse Outlook, 42, 15-25.
38.
SuppeF. (1992). Paradigms, socialization and nursing science. Proceeding of the 1992 annual forum on doctoral education in nursing. University of Maryland School of Nursing.
39.
TitlerM. G.KleiberC.SteelmanV.GoodeC.RakelB.Barry-WalkerJ.SmallB.BuckwalkerK. (1994). Infusing research into practice to promote quality care. Nursing Research, 43(5), 307-313.
40.
WalkerL. O.AvantK. C. (2019). Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Pearson.
