In this article, I propose that engagement in nursing practice affords an epistemic advantage and should be included in defining nursing science and as a warrant for scientific knowledge. I appeal to standpoint epistemology, a philosophical theory, to support my proposal. A new conception of objectivity, which aligns with the contemporary practice of science and standpoint theory, is discussed. The article presents a preliminary theory of nursing standpoint theory that explains epistemic advantage of a practicing nurse. Open questions about nursing science conclude the article.
HarawayD. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
8.
HardingS. (2004). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity? In HardingS. (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 127-140). New York: Routledge. First published 1992.
9.
HartsockN. C. M. (2003). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In HardingS.HintikkaM. B. (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and the philosophy of science (pp. 283-310) (2nd ed.). Kluwer Academic Pub. First published in 1983.
10.
IntemannK. (2011). Diversity and dissent in science: Does democracy always serve feminist aims? In GrasswickH. (Ed.), Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge (pp. 111-132). Springer.
11.
JanackM. (1997). Standpoint epistemology without the ‘standpoint’? An examination of epistemic privilege and epistemic authority. Hypatia, 12(2), 125-139.
12.
JonesS. E. (2020). Negotiating transgender identity at work: A movement to theorize a transgender standpoint epistemology. Management Communication Quarterly, 4(2), 251-278.
13.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago.
14.
KuklaQ. (2006). Objectivity and perspective in empirical knowledge. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 3, 80-95.
15.
KurkiM. (2015). Stretching situated knowledge: From standpoint epistemology to cosmology and back again. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 779-797.
16.
LiehrP. R.SmithM. J. (2018). Story theory. In SmithM. J.LiehrP. R. (Eds.), Middle range theory for nursing (4th ed.) (pp. 241-264). Springer.
17.
LonginoH. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.
18.
LonginoH. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton University Press.
ParseR. R. (2020). Rosemarie Rizzo Parse’s humanbecoming paradigm. In SmithM. C. (Ed.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (5th ed., pp. 259-270). F.A. Davis.
21.
PetrovskayaO.PurkisM. E.BjornsdottirK. (2019). Revisiting ‘intelligent nursing’: Olga Petrovskaya in conversation with Mary Ellen Purkis and Kristin Bjornsdottir. Nursing Philosophy, 20(3), e12259. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12259.
22.
ReedP. G. (2019). Intermodernism: A philosophical perspective for development of scientific nursing theory. Advances in Nursing Science, 42(1), 17-27.
23.
ReedP. G. (2021). The epistemic dignity of knowledge developed through nursing practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 34(1), 39-44.
WoodS. K. (2020). Keeping the nurse in the nurse practitioner: Returning to our disciplinary roots of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 43(1), 50-61.
33.
WylieA. (2003). Why standpoint matters. In FigueroaR.HardingS. (Eds.), Science and other cultures: Diversity in the philosophy of science and technology (pp. 26-48). Routledge.
