The discord within nursing regarding the definition of nursing science has created great angst, particularly for those who view nursing science as a body of knowledge derived from theories specific to its unique concerns. The purpose of this brief article is to suggest a perspective and process grounded in appreciation of wholeness that may offer a way forward for proponents of a unitary-transformative nursing science that transcends the discord. This way forward is guided by principles of fostering dissent without contempt, generating a well-imagined future, and garnering appreciatively inspired action for change.
American Holistic Nurses Association & American Nurses Association. (2013). Scope and standards of practice: Holistic nursing (2nd ed.). Silver Springs, MD: American Nurses Association.
2.
BarnsteinerJ.DischJ.WaltonK. (2014). Person and family centered care. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.
3.
BarrettE. A. M. (2017). Again, what is nursing science?Nursing Science Quarterly, 30(2), 129-133.
4.
CowlingW. R.III. (1999). A unitary-transformative nursing science: Potentials for transcending dichotomies. Nursing Science Quarterly, 12(2), 132-137.
5.
CowlingW. R.III. (2000). Healing as appreciating wholeness. Advances in Nursing Science, 22(3), 16-32.
CowlingW. R.III. (2004). Pattern, participation, praxis, and power in unitary appreciative inquiry. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(3), 202-214.
8.
CowlingW. R.III. (2005). Despairing women and healing outcomes: A unitary appreciative nursing perspective. Advances in Nursing Science, 28(2), 94-106.
9.
CowlingW. R.III. (2007). A unitary participatory vision of nursing knowledge. Advances in Nursing Science, 30(1), 61-70.
10.
CowlingW. R.IIIRepedeE. (2010). Unitary appreciative inquiry: Evolution and refinement. Advances in Nursing Science, 33(1), 64-77.
11.
FawcettJ.DeSanto-MadeyaS. (2013). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
12.
FlorczakK. L. (2011). Angst for nursing theory. Nursing Science Quarterly, 24(4), 311.
13.
GraceP. J.WillisD. G.RoyC.JonesD. A. (2017). Profession at the crossroads: A dialog concerning the preparation of nursing scholars and leaders. Nursing Outlook, 64(1), 61-70.
14.
HagedornM. E.ZahourekR. P. (2007). Research paradigms and methods for investigating holistic nursing concerns. Nursing Clinics of North America, 42, 335-353.
15.
HenlyS. J.McCarthyD. O.WymanJ. F.HeitkemperM. M.RedekerN. S.TitlerM. G.. . . Dunbar-JacobJ. (2015). Emerging areas of science: Recommendations for nursing science education from the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science Idea Festival. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 398-407
16.
MalinskiV. M. (2017). Pregnant with promise for far too long: Time to deliver!Nursing Science Quarterly, 30(1), 38-43.
17.
NewmanM. A. (1997). Experiencing the whole. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(1), 34-39.
18.
NewmanM. A. (2002). The pattern that connects. Advances in Nursing Science, 24(3), 1-7.
19.
NewmanM. A. (2003). A world of no boundaries. Advances in Nursing Science, 26(4), 240-245.
20.
NickitasD. M.FredericksonK. (2015). Nursing knowledge and theory: Where is the economic value?Nursing Economics, 33(4), 190, 239.
21.
ReasonP.BradburyH. (2001). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of aspiration. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 1-14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
RogersM. E. (1992). Nursing science and the space age. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5(1), 27-34.
23.
SmithM. C.ParkerM. E. (2014). Nursing theories and nursing practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
24.
VillarruelA. M.FairmanJ. A. (2015). The Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science Idea Festival Advisory Committee: Good ideas that need to go further. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 436-438.
25.
WatsonJ.BrewerB. B. (2015). Caring science research: Criteria, evidence, and measurement. Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(5), 235-236.
