This article again asks, What is nursing science? Who knows? Who cares? The author describes the threat to the survival of nursing science grounded in nursing frameworks and theories. This threat is magnified by the proposal of the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science (CANS) to change the curricula of PhD education. The aim of CANS is to prepare nurse scientists for lifelong competitive careers in interdisciplinary research, often focused on funding priorities of the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR). Curricula would include preparation for conducting research in topics such as omics, e-science, translation science, biobehavioral science, symptom science, and team science. How can this be nursing science? It is argued that this focus might obliterate nursing’s discipline-specific phenomenon of concern, the human-universe-health process.
BarrettE. A. M. (1986). Investigation of the principle of helicy: The relationship of human field motion and power. In MalinskiV. M. (Ed.), Explorations on Martha Rogers’ science of unitary human beings (pp. 173-184). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4.
BarrettE. A. M. (2002). What is nursing science?Nursing Science Quarterly, 15, 551-560.
5.
BarrettE. A. M. (2010). Power as knowing participation in change: What’s new and what’s next. Nursing Science Quarterly, 23, 47-54.
6.
BarrettE. A. M. (2015). Theoretical advancements and practice applications of Barrett’s theory of power as knowing participation in change. In SmithM. C.ParkerM. (Eds.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (4th ed., pp. 495-508). Philadelphia: F.A Davis.
7.
BarrettE. A. M.CodyW. K.DalyJ.MillarB.MitchellG. J.TakahashiT.ToikkanenT.WillmanA. M. L.ZanottiR. (1997). What is nursing science? An international dialogue. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 10-13.
EricssonJ. I. (2013). Influencing professional practice at the bedside. In EricssonJ. I.JonesD. A.DitomassiM. (Eds.), Fostering nurse-led care: Professional practice for the bedside leader from Massachusetts General Hospital (pp. 1-19). Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau.
10.
EricssonJ. I.JonesD. A.DitomassiM. (2013). Fostering nurse-led care: Professional practice for the bedside leader from Massachusetts General Hospital. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau.
11.
FawcettJ. (2000). The state of nursing science: Where is the nursing in the science?Theoria: Journal of Nursing Theory, 9, 3-10.
12.
FawcettJ.DeSanto-MedeyaS. (2013). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
13.
FrostR. (1967). The road not taken. In FrostR. (Ed.), Complete poems of Robert Frost. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
14.
GraceP. J.WillisD. G.RoyC.JonesD. A. (2016). Profession at the crossroads: A dialog concerning the preparation of nursing scholars and leaders. Nursing Outlook, 64, 61-70.
15.
HenlyS. J.McCarthyD. O.WymanJ. F.Alt-WhiteA. C.StoneP. W.McCarthyA. M.. . . MooreS. M. (2015). Emerging areas of nursing science and PhD education for the 21st century: Response to commentaries. Nursing Outlook, 63, 439-445.
16.
HenlyS. J.McCarthyD. O.WymanJ. F.HeitkemperM. M.RedekerN. S.TitlerM. G.. . . Dunbar-JacobJ. (2015). Emerging Areas of Science: Recommendations for nursing scienc eeducation from the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science Idea Festival. Nursing Outlook, 63, 398-407.
17.
HenlyS. J.McCarthyD. O.WymanJ. F.StoneP. W.RedekerN. S.McCarthyA. M.. . . ConleyY. P. (2015). Integrating emerging areas of nursing science into PhD programs. Nursing Outlook, 63, 408-416.
18.
JohnsonD. E. (1959a). The nature of a science of nursing. Nursing Outlook, 7, 291-294.
19.
JohnsonD. E. (1959b). A philosophy of nursing. Nursing Outlook, 7, 198-200.
20.
MalinskiV. M. (2017). Pregnant with promise for far too long: Time to deliver!Nursing Science Quarterly, 30, 38-43.
21.
MunhallP. L. (1997). Déjà vu, parroting, buy-ins, and an opening. In KingI. M.FawcettJ. (Eds.), The language of nursing theory and metatheory (pp. 79-87). Indianpolis: Sigma Theta Tau.
22.
NickitasD. M.FredericksonK. (2015). Nursing knowledge and theory: Where is the economic value?Nursing Economics, 33, 190, 194.
23.
ParseR. R. (2015a). Nursing: A basic or applied science. Nursing Science Quarterly, 28, 181-182.
24.
ParseR. R. (2015b). Nursing science or it is the science of nursing?Nursing Science Quarterly, 28, 101-102.
25.
ParseR. R. (2016). Where have all the nursing theories gone?Nursing Science Quarterly, 29, 101-102.
26.
PhillipsJ. R. (2016). Rogers’ science of unitary human beings: Beyond the frontier of science. Nursing Science Quarterly, 20, 38-46.
27.
RogersM. E. (1992). Nursing science and the space age. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 27-34.
28.
SmithM. C.ParkerM. (Eds.). (2016). Nursing theories and nursing practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
29.
WatsonJ. (1999). Postmodern nursing and beyond. New York: Churchill Livingston.
30.
WymanJ. F.HenlyS. J. (2015). PhD programs in nursing in the United States: Visibility of American Association of Colleges of Nursing core curricular elements and emerging areas of science. Nursing Outlook, 63, 390-397.
