The purpose of this column is to consider the notion of power in research. To that end, the idea of power is considered from the perspective of philosophy and then linked to a nursing concept analysis that compares the differences between power over and power to. Then, the nature of power relations is compared and contrasted between quantitative and qualitative methodologies.
EllisP. (2015). The language of research (part 6): research methodologies: ethnography. Wounds UK, 11(3), 102-103.
2.
FoucaultM. (1998). The history of sexuality: The will to knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
3.
FoucaultM. (2000). Power. New York: The New Press.
4.
HawksJ. H. (1991). Power: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16, 754-762.
5.
HergenratherK. C.GeisheckerS.McGuire-KuletzM.GiltinD. J.RhodesS. D. (2010). An introduction to community-based participatory research. Rehabilitation Education, 24(24), 225-238.
6.
Karnieli-MillerO.StrierR.PessachL. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279-289.
7.
KaufmannW. (1974). Nietzsche philosopher, psychologist, antichrist. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
8.
McCannT.ClarkE. (2003). Grounded theory in nursing research: part 1 – methodology. Nurse Researcher, 11(2), 7-18.
9.
NietzscheF. (1901/1968). In KaufmannW. (Ed.), The will to power. (KaufmannW.HollingdaleR. J., Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1901).
10.
ParseR. R. (1998). The human becoming school of thought: A perspective for nurses and other health professionals. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
11.
ParseR. R. (2001). Qualitative inquiry: The path to sciencing. Sudbury MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
12.
ParseR. R. (2011). The humanbecoming modes of inquiry: Refinements. Nursing Science Quarterly, 24(1), 11-15.
13.
StoeckerR. (1999). Are academics irrelevant? Roles for scholars in participatory research. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(5), 840-54.
14.
TillichP. (1954). Love, power, and justice. London: Oxford University Press.
