This essay addresses the name of our discipline. Discussion of the use of the term, nursology, focuses on the origin of the term, its use as a name for our discipline and its use as a research method and a practice methodology. Advantages and disadvantages of nursology as the name for our discipline are gleaned from PhD program students’ responses to a question posed by Reed (1997).
CodyW. K.MalinskiV. M.RawnsleyM. (1996). Response to: “On the requirements for a metaparadigm: An invitation to dialogue.”Nursing Science Quarterly, 9, 97-99 (Cody), 100-102 (Malinski), 102-106 (Rawnsley).
2.
ConwayM. E. (1985). Toward greater specificity in defining nursing’s metaparadigm. Advances in Nursing Science, 7(4), 73–81.
3.
de PaulaC. C.SchaurichD.PadoinS. M. M.CrossettiM. G. O. (2004). O cuidado como encontro vivido e dialogado na Teoria de Enfermagem Humanistica de Paterson e Zderad. [The care as a lived and dialogued encounter in the Humanistic Nursing Theory of Paterson and Zderad.] Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 17, 425-431. [Portuguese; Selected sections translated by Teresa Roberts]
4.
FitzpatrickJ. J. (2014). The discipline of nursing. In FitzpatrickJ. J.McCarthyG. (Eds.), Theories guiding nursing research and practice: Making nursing knowledge development explicit (pp. 3-13). New York: Springer.
5.
KleimanS. (2010). Josephine Paterson and Loretta Zderad’s humanistic nursing theory. In ParkerM. E.SmithM. C. (Eds.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (3rd ed., pp. 337-350). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
6.
McFarlandM. R.Wehbe-AlamahH. B. (2015). Leininger’s culture care diversity and universality; A worldwide nursing theory (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
7.
MedeirosH. M. F.MottaM. G. C. (2008). HIV/AIDS children living in shelters under the perspective of humanistic nursing. Revista Gaucha de Enfermagem, 29, 400-407. [Portuguese; English abstract; translation of method section by Teresa Roberts]
8.
MeleisA. I. (2012). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
9.
MochS. D. (1990). Health within the experience of breast cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15, 1426-1435.
10.
O’TooleM. (Ed.) (2013). Mosby’s medical dictionary (9th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
PatersonJ. G. (1971). From a philosophy of clinical nursing to a method of nursology. Nursing Research, 20, 143-146.
13.
PatersonJ. G. (1978). The tortuous way toward nursing theory. In Theory development: What, why, how? (pp. 49-65). New York: National League for Nursing. (Pub. No. 15-1708)
14.
PatersonJ. G.ZderadL. T. (1976). Humanistic nursing. New York: National League for Nursing (Reissued 1988).
15.
ReedP. G. (1997). Nursing: The ontology of the discipline. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 76-79.
16.
RoperN. (1976). A model for nursing and nursology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1, 219-227.
17.
RoperN.LoganW. W.TierneyA. J. (1980). The elements of nursing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. [The fifth and last edition of the book was published as RoperN.LoganW. W.TierneyA. J. (2000). The Roper-Logan-Tierney model of nursing based on activities of living (5th ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.]
18.
SpeedieG. (1983). Nursology of mouth care: Preventing, comforting and seeking activities related to mouth care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 8, 33-40.
ZderadL. T. (1978). From here -and-now to theory: Reflections on “how.” In Theory development: What, why, how? (pp. 35-48). New York: National League for Nursing. (Pub. No. 15-1708)
