The conundrum of using data pertinent to a study that were gathered after an official interview ceased is considered in this column. First, details of a proposed study on losing a partner will be provided followed by a snippet of a dialogue with one participant. Then the conundrum of whether or not to use the data is explored and a conclusion reached through consideration of standards for qualitative research.
BuckleJ. L.DwyerS. C.JacksonM. (2010). Qualitative bereavement research: Incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 111-125.
3.
KauffmanJ. (2008). What is “no recovery?”. Death Studies, 32, 74-83.
4.
ParseR. R. (1981). Man-living-health: A theory of nursing. New York: Delmar Publishers.
5.
ParseR. R. (1998). The human becoming school of thought: A perspective for nurses and other health professionals. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
6.
ParseR. R. (2001). Qualitative inquiry: The path of sciencing. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
7.
ParseR. R. (2007). The humanbecoming school of thought in 2050. Nursing Science Quarterly, 20(4), 308-311.
8.
ParseR. R. (2013). Living quality: A humanbecoming phenomenon. Nursing Science Quarterly, 26(2), 1-5.
9.
ParseR. R. (2014). The humanbecoming paradigm: A transformational worldview. Pittsburgh, PA: Discovery International Publications.
