The value of being a part of a network of theoretically like-minded individuals for a small group of nurse scholars, namely Richard Cowling, Howard Butcher and William Cody, is here discussed. The like-mindedness in this case is what has been described by some as an angular view of nursing or the simultaneity paradigm. An underlying theme is that joy-sorrow often arises in living the isolation and connectedness of a career in nursing that includes a commitment to scholarship.
BarrettE. A. M. (1989). A nursing theory of power for nursing practice: Derivation from Rogers’ paradigm. In Riehl-SiscaJ. (Ed.), Conceptual models for nursing practice (3rd ed., pp. 207-217). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
2.
BaumannS. L. (1999). The lived experience of hope: Children in families struggling to make a home. In ParseR. R., Hope: An international human becoming perspective (pp. 191-210). Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
3.
ButcherH. K. (2003, November). Measuring the Effect of Structured Written Emotional Expression on Caregiver Burden Outcomes. Paper presented at the 37th Biennial Convention of Sigma Theta Tau International, Toronto, Canada.
4.
ButcherH. K. (2006). Applications of Rogers’ science of unitary human beings. In ParkerM. E. (Ed.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (2nd ed., pp. 167-186). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
5.
ButcherH.McGonigal-KenneyM. (2005). Depression & dispiritedness in later life: A ‘gray drizzle of horror’ isn’t inevitable. American Journal of Nursing, 105, 52-61.
6.
CodyW. K. (1995). Of life immense in passion, pulse, and power: Dialoguing with Whitman and Parse- A hermeneutic study. In ParseR. R. (Ed.), Illuminations: The humanbecoming theory in practice and research (pp. 269-308). New York: National League for Nursing.
7.
CodyW. K.FillerJ. E. (1999). The lived experience of hope for women residing in a shelter. In ParseR. R., Hope: An international human becoming perspective (pp. 211-226). Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
8.
CowlingR. (1999). A unitary-transformative nursing science: Potentials for transcending dichotomies. Nursing Science Quarterly, 12, 132-135.
9.
CowlingR. (2008). An essay on women, despair, and healing: A personal narrative. Advances in Nursing Science, 31, 249-258.
GardnerH. (2008). The five minds for the future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
12.
HanhT. N. (1975). The miracle of mindfulness: An introduction to the practice of meditation (HoM., Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon.
13.
ParseR. R. (1987). Paradigms and theories. In ParseR. R. (Ed.), Nursing science: Major paradigms, theories and critiques (pp. 1-12). Philadelphia: Saunders.
14.
ParseR. R. (1995). (Ed.). Illuminations: The humanbecoming theory in practice and research. New York: National League for Nursing.
15.
ParseR. R. (1998). The humanbecoming school of thought: A perspective for nurses and other health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
ParseR. R. (1999). Hope: An international human becoming perspective. Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
17.
ParseR. R. (2000). Paradigms: A reprise. Nursing Science Quarterly, 13, 275-276.
18.
ParseR. R. (2001). Qualitative inquiry, The path of sciencing. Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
19.
PatersonJ. G.ZderadL. T. (1976). Humanistic nursing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20.
RogersM. E. (1970). An introduction to a theoretical basis of nursing. Philadelphia: Davis.
21.
SearlesH. F. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor’s emotional experience. Psychiatry, 18, 135-146.
22.
TippettK. (2010). Einstein’s God: Conversations about science and the human spirit. New York: Penguin.
