The purpose of this Roy adaptation model-based multi-site international mixed method study was to examine the relations of type of caesarean birth (unplanned/planned), number of caesarean births (primary/repeat), and preparation for caesarean birth to women’s perceptions of and responses to caesarean birth. The sample included 488 women from the United States (n = 253), Finland (n = 213), and Australia (n = 22). Path analysis revealed direct effects for type of and preparation for caesarean birth on responses to caesarean birth, and an indirect effect for preparation on responses to caesarean birth through perception of birth the experience.
AffonsoD. D. (1977). “Missing pieces”—A study of postpartum feelings. Birth and the Family Journal, 4, 159-164.
2.
ClarkS. C.TaffelS. (1995). Changes in caesarean delivery in the United States, 1988 and 1993. Birth, 22, 63-67.
3.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
CranleyM. S.HedahlK. J.PeggS. H. (1983). Women’s perceptions of vaginal and caesarean deliveries. Nursing Research, 32, 10-15.
5.
FawcettJ. (1981). Needs of caesarean birth parents. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 10, 372-376.
6.
FawcettJ. (2003). The Roy adaptation model: A program of nursing research. Japanese Journal of Nursing Research, 36(1), 67-73.
7.
FawcettJ. (2006). The Roy adaptation model and content analysis. Aquichan, 6(1), 34-37.
8.
FawcettJ.AberC.WeissM.HausslerS.MyersS. T.KingC.. (2005). Adaptation to caesarean birth: Implementation of an international multisite study. Nursing Science Quarterly, 18, 204-210.
9.
FawcettJ.BurrittJ. (1985). An exploratory study of antenatal preparation for caesarean birth. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 14, 224-230.
10.
FawcettJ.KnauthD. (1996). The factor structure of the Perception of Birth [Experience] Scale. Nursing Research, 45, 83-86.
11.
FawcettJ.PollioN.TullyA. (1992). Women’s perceptions of caesarean and vaginal delivery: Another look. Research in Nursing and Health, 15, 439-446.
12.
FawcettJ.WeissM. E. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation to caesarean birth. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15, 282-297.
13.
HamiltonB. E.MartinJ. A.VenturaS. J. (2009). Births: Preliminary data for 2007. National vital statistics reports (Vol. 57, No. 12). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
14.
HamiltonB. E.MartinJ. A.VenturaS. J.SuttonP. D.MenackerF. (2005). Births: Preliminary data for 2004. National vital statistics reports (Vol. 54, No. 8). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
LavenderT.WalkinshawS. A. (1998). Can midwives reduce postpartum psychological morbidity? A randomized trial. Birth, 25, 215-219.
17.
LawsP.AbeywardanaS.WalkerJ.SullivanE. A. (2007). Australia’s mothers and babies 2005 (Perinatal statistics series No. 20, Cat. No. PER 40). Sydney: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit.
18.
LawsP. J.HilderL. (2008). Australia’s mothers and babies 2006 (Perinatal statistics series No. 22., Cat. No. PER 46). Sydney: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Perinatal Statistics Unit.
19.
MainE. K. (1999). Reducing caesarean birth rates with data-driven quality improvement activities. Pediatrics, 102, 374-383.
20.
MarutJ. S.MercerR. T. (1979). Comparison of primiparas’ perceptions of vaginal and caesarean births. Nursing Research, 28, 260-266.
21.
MercerR. T.HackleyK. C.BostromA. G. (1983). Relationship of psychosocial and perinatal variables to perception of childbirth. Nursing Research, 32, 202-207.
22.
MunroB. H. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
NorrisA. (2005). Path analysis. In MunroB. H., Statistical methods for health care research (5th ed., pp. 377-403). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
25.
RadinJ. T. G.HarmonJ. S.HansonD. A. (1993). Nurses’ care during labor: Its effect on the caesarean birth rate of healthy, nulliparous women. Birth, 20, 14-21.
26.
ReichertJ. A.BaronM.FawcettJ. (1993). Changes in attitudes toward caesarean birth. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 22, 159-167.
27.
RoyC. (2009). The Roy adaptation model (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
28.
RoyC.AndrewsH. A. (1999). The Roy adaptation model (2nd ed.). Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange.
29.
SadanO.LeshnoM.GottreichA.GolanA.LurieS. (2007). Once a caesarean always a caesarean? A computer-assisted decision analysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 276, 517-521.
30.
ShearerE. L. (1989). Does caesarean delivery affect the parents?Birth, 16, 57-58.
31.
SilvaV. (2001). Women’s responses to caesarean birth: Analysis of Milwaukee data. Unpublished manuscript, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston.
