The purpose of this study was to uncover the structure of the lived experience of feeling misunderstood. Parse’s phenomenological-hermeneutic research method was used to answer the research question: What is the structure of the lived experience of feeling misunderstood? Extraction-synthesis revealed four core concepts. The structure is the lived experience of feeling misunderstood is disheartening insignificance surfacing with discordant affiliations, as resignation with resiliency emerges with inventive endeavors. Implications for nursing research and practice are presented.
BunkersS. S. (1999). The lived experience of hope for those working with homeless persons. In ParseR. R., Hope: An international human becoming perspective (pp. 227-250). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
2.
CahnD. D.ShulmanG. M. (1984). The perceived understanding instrument. Communication Research Reports, 1(1), 122-125.
3.
CarrollS. M. (2007). Silent, slow lifeworld: The communication experience of nonvocal ventilated patients. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1165-1177.
4.
ClarkeA.CooperC. (2001). Psychosocial rehabilitation after disfiguring injury or disease: Investigating the training needs of specialist nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(1), 18-26.
5.
CondonB. (2008). Concept inventing: A humanbecoming definition of feeling misunderstood. Nursing Science Quarterly, 21, 212-216.
6.
Dell’ ApiM.RennickJ. E.RosmusC. (2007). Childhood chronic pain and health care professional interactions: Shaping the chronic pain experiences of children. Journal of Child Health Care, 11, 269-286.
7.
DicksonA.KnussenC.FlowersP. (2008). ‘That was my old life; it’s almost like a past-life now’: Identity crisis, loss and adjustment amongst people living with chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychology and Health, 23, 459-476.
8.
GriceJ. W. (1997). On the validity of the perceived understanding instrument. Psychological Reports, 80, 1007-1010.
9.
HumeD. (1993). An enquiry concerning human understanding (SteinbergE., Ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. (Original work published 1777)
10.
Jonas-SimpsonC. M. (2001). Feeling understood: A melody of human becoming. Nursing Science Quarterly, 14, 222-230.
11.
LockeJ. (1996). An essay concerning human understanding (WinklerK. P., Ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. (Original work published 1689)
NakashimaM. (2007). Positive dying in later life: Spiritual resiliency among sixteen hospice patients. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, 19(2), 43-66.
14.
ParseR. R. (1981). Man-living-health: A theory of nursing. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15.
ParseR. R. (1998). The human becoming school of thought. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
ParseR. R. (2001). Qualitative inquiry: The path of sciencing. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
17.
ParseR. R. (2004). Person-centered care. Nursing Science Quarterly, 17, 193.
18.
ParseR. R. (2005). The human becoming modes of inquiry: Emerging sciencing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 18, 297-300.
19.
ParseR. R. (2007). The humanbecoming school of thought in 2050. Nursing Science Quarterly, 20, 308-311.
20.
ParseR. R. (2008). The humanbecoming leading-following model. Nursing Science Quarterly, 21, 369-375.
21.
RumseyN.ClarkeA.WhiteP.Wyn-WilliamsM.GarlickW. (2004). Altered body image: Appearance-related concerns of people with visible disfigurement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 443-453.
22.
ShattellM.HoganB. (2005). Facilitating communication: How to truly understand what patients mean. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 43(10), 29-32.
