The purpose of this study was to explore the experience of adult genetic testing. Grounded theory was used to plan, guide, and analyze in-depth interviews with 29 participants. The theory of genetic vulnerability was developed and is composed of five concepts: (a) experiencing the family disease, (b) testing for a mutation, (c) fore-grounding inherited disease risk, (d) responding to knowledge of genetic vulnerability, and (e) altering or avoiding the family experience of inherited disease. Roy's model of adaptation is discussed as a valuable lens through which to test and adapt this theory.
American Society of Clinical Oncology. (2003 ). American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 2397-2406.
2.
Bowers, B.J. (1989). Grounded theory: From conceptualization to research process. In B. Sarter (Ed.), Paths to knowledge: Innovative research methods for nursing (pp. 33-58). New York: National League for Nursing.
3.
Caron, C.D., & Bowers, B.J. (2001). Methods and application of dimensional analysis: A contribution to concept and knowledge development in nursing. In B. Rogers & K. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: Foundations, techniques, and applications (Vol. 2, pp. 285-319). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
4.
Finkler, K., Skrzynia, C., & Evans, J.P. (2003). The new genetics and its consequences for family, kinship, medicine and medical genetics. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 403-412.
5.
Frederickson, K. (2000). Nursing knowledge development through research: Using the Roy adaptation model. Nursing Science Quarterly , 13, 12-17.
6.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
7.
Hamilton, R.J. (2003). Experiencing predictive genetic testing in families with Huntington's disease and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin— Madison, Madison, WI.
8.
Hamilton, R.J., Bowers, B.J., & Williams, J.K. (2005). Disclosing genetic test results to family members. Journal of Nursing Scholarship , 37(1), 18-24.
9.
Kenen, R. (1995). The human genome project: Creator of the potentially sick, potentially vulnerable and potentially stigmatized? In I. Robinson (Ed.), Life & death under high technology medicine (pp. 49-64). Manchester, UK: University of Manchester Press.
10.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London : Sage.
11.
Marrs, J.A., & Lowry, L.W. (2006). Nursing theory and practice: Connecting the dots. NursingScience Quarterly, 19, 44-50.
12.
McAllister, M. (2002). Predictive genetic testing and beyond: A theory of engagement. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 491-508.
13.
McAllister, M. (2003). Personal theories of inheritance, coping strategies, risk perception and engagement in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer families offered genetic testing. Clinical Genetics, 64, 179-189.
14.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2006 ). Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: Breast and ovarian clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Retrieved April 7, 2007, from www.nccn.org
15.
Nussbaum, R.L., McInnes, R.R., & Willard, H.F. (2001). Thompson & Thompson genetics in medicine (6th ed.). New York: W. B. Saunders.
16.
Roy, C., & Andrews, H.A. (1999). The Roy adaptation model (2nd ed.). Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
17.
Schatzman, L. (1991). Dimensional analysis: Notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In K. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organization and social processes: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 303-314). New York: Aldine DeGruyter.
18.
Skirton, H., & Eiser, C. (2003). Discovering and addressing the client's lay construct of genetic disease: An important aspect of genetic health care? Research and Theory for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 17, 339-352.
19.
Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Walter, F., Emery, J., Braithwaite, D., & Marteau, T. (2004). Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Annals ofFamily Medicine, 2, 583-594.
21.
Williams, J.K., Schutte, D.L., Evers, C., & Holkup, P.A. (2000). Redefinition: Coping with normal results from predictive genetic testing for neurodegenerative disorders. Research in Nursing &Health, 23, 260-269.
