In this column, the authors discuss ethical and scientific standards in research and publication in light of their worldviews; human science; human becoming; and Parse’s conceptual, ethical, methodological, and interpretive dimensions of the research process.
American Nurses Association. (2001, June 30). Code of ethics for nurses—Provisions approved as of June 30, 2001. Retrieved June 8, 2005, from http://www.nursingworld.org/ethics/chcode.htm
2.
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Aulisio, M. P., Arnold, R. M., & Youngner, S. J. (2000). Health care ethics consultation: Nature, goals, and competencies: A position paper from the society for health and human values-society for bioethics consultation task force on standards for bioethics consultation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 133(1), 59-69.
4.
Burns, N. (1989). Standards for qualitative research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1, 44-52.
5.
Clouser, K. D., & Gert, B. (2004). Common morality. In G. Khushf (Ed.), Handbook of bioethics: Taking stock in the field from a philosophical perspective (pp. 121-141). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6.
Cody, W. K., & Mitchell, G. J. (2002). Nursing knowledge and human science revisited: Practical and political considerations. Nursing Science Quarterly, 15, 4-13.
7.
Collaborative IRB training initiative (CITI) course. Retrieved June 28, 2005, from http://www.citiprogram.org/members/courseandexam/moduletext/
8.
Fawcett, J. (2000). Analysis and evaluation of contemporary nursing knowledge: Nursing models and theories. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
9.
Financial relationships and interests in research involving human subjects: Guidance for human subjects protection. (2001, January 10). Retrieved June 28, 2005, from http://www.fda.gov/oc/guidance/financialdis.html
10.
Kass, L. R. (2002). Life, liberty and the defense of dignity: The challenge for bioethics. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
11.
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & De Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737-738.
12.
Mason, D. J. (2006). On freedom of the scientific press: Can you trust the information you read in nursing journals?American Journal of Nursing, 106(5), 11-11.
13.
Parse, R. R. (1998). The human becoming school of thought: A perspective for nurses and other health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Parse, R. R. (1999). Authorship: Whose responsibility?Nursing Science Quarterly, 12, 99-99.
15.
Parse, R. R. (2001). Qualitative inquiry: The path of sciencing. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
16.
Parse, R. R. (2005a). The human becoming modes of inquiry: Emerging science. Nursing Science Quarterly, 18, 297-300.
17.
Parse, R. R. (2005b). Scientific standards: A renewed alert. Nursing Science Quarterly, 18, 97-97.
18.
Pilkington, F. B. (2002). Scientific merit and research ethics. Nursing Science Quarterly, 15, 196-200.
19.
Tollefson, G. (2002). Women gathered, gathering. Retrieved June 12, 2005, from www.brighidsfire.com
20.
White, A. H., Coudret, N. A., & Goodwin, C. S. (1998). From authorship to contributorship: Promoting integrity in research publication. Nurse Educator, 23(6), 26-32.
