Cody, W. K. (2003). Diversity and becoming: Implications of human existence as coexistence. Nursing Science Quarterly, 16, 195-200.
2.
Goodon, M., Porter, C., Gonzalez, R., & Mims, B. (2001). Rethinking the relationship between nursing and diversity. American Journal of Nursing, 10(1), 63-65.
3.
Robinson, J. (2000). Increasing students’ cultural sensitivity: A step toward greater diversity in nursing. Nurse Educator, 25(3), 131-135.
4.
Bournes, D. A. (2000). A commitment to honoring people’s choices. Nursing Science Quarterly, 13, 18-23.
5.
Cody, W. K. (2001). The ethics of bearing witness in healthcare: A beginning exploration. Nursing Science Quarterly, 14, 288-298.
6.
Metzger-McQuiston, C., & Webb, A. A. (1995). Foundations of nursing theory: Contributions of 12 key theorists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Mitchell, G. J. (1995). The view of freedom within the human becoming theory. In R. R. Parse (Ed.), Illuminations: The human becoming theory in practice and research (pp. 27-43). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
8.
Mitchell, G. J. (2000). Patient-focused care and human becoming thought: Connecting the right stuff. Nursing Science Quarterly, 13, 216-224.
9.
Mitchell, G. J. (2002). Self-serving and other-serving: Matters of trust and intent. Nursing Science Quarterly, 15, 288-293.
10.
Mitchell, G. J., & Bournes, D. A. (2000). Nurse as patient advocate? In search of straight thinking. Nursing Science Quarterly, 13, 204-209.
11.
Mitchell, G. J., Closson, T., Coulis, N., Flint, F., & Gray, B. (2000). Patient focused care and human becoming thought: Connecting the right stuff. Nursing Science Quarterly, 13, 216-224.
12.
Parse, R. R. (2000). Obfuscating: The persistent practice of misnaming. Nursing Science Quarterly, 13, 91-92.
13.
Parse, R. R., Coyne, A. B., & Smith, M. J. (1985). Nursing research: Qualitative methods. Bowie, MD: Prentice Hall.
14.
Rogers, B. (2002). Honesty and ethics in the profession-Gallop poll results. AAOHN Journal, 50(4), 167.
15.
Seedhouse, D. (2000). Practical nursing philosophy: The universal ethical code. Chichester, NY: Wiley.
16.
Whittemore, R., & Roy, C. (2002). Adapting to diabetes mellitus: A theory synthesis. Nursing Science Quarterly, 15, 311-317.
17.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). The quality chasm report. Retrieved February 2, 2004, from http://www.iom.edu/report
18.
Institute of Medicine. (2003). Health professions education: A bridge to quality. Retrieved February 4, 2004, from http://books.nap.edu/books/0309087236/html/121.html%23pagetop
19.
Mitchell, G. J. (2003). Nursing shortage or nursing famine: Looking beyond numbers?Nursing Science Quarterly, 16, 219-224.
20.
O’Neil, E., & Seago, J. A. (2002). Meeting the challenge of nursing and the nation’s health. JAMA, 288, 2040-2041.
21.
Porter-O’Grady, T. (2003). Of hubris and hope: Transforming nursing for a new age. Nursing Exconomics, 21(2), 59-64.
22.
Tri-Council. (2001). Strategies to revise the new nursing shortage: A policy statement from Tri-council members: The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), The American Nurses Association (ANA), The American Organization of Nurse Executives (AONE), The National League for Nursing (NLN). Tar Heel Nurse, 63(2), 22-24.
23.
Watson, J. (2001). Post-hospital nursing: Shortage, shifts, and scripts. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 25(3), 77.
24.
Fawcett, J. (2003a). Conceptual models of nursing: International in scope and substance? The case of the Roy adaptation model. Nursing Science Quarterly, 16, 315-318.
25.
Fawcett, J. (2003b). Theory and practice: A conversation with Marilyn E. Parker. Nursing Science Quarterly, 16, 131-136.
26.
Meleis, A. I. (1997). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (3rd ed.). New York: Lippincott.
27.
Roy, C. (1984). Introduction to nursing: An adaptation model. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
