The authors present a reformulation of empowerment based upon historical and current perspectives of empowerment and a synthesis of existing literature and Rogerian thought. Reformulation of non-Rogerian concepts familiar to nurses is proposed as a strategy to accelerate the mainstreaming of Rogerian thought into nursing practice and research. The reformulation of empowerment as a participatory process of well-being inherent among human beings may provide nurses with new insights for practice. This paper may also serve as a model for reformulating other non-Rogerian concepts and theories for wider dissemination across the discipline.
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (1998). Life-span theory in developmental psychology. In R. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development (pp. 1029-1143). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2.
Barrett, E. A. M. (1990). Health patterning with clients in a private practice environment. In E. A. M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions of Rogers’ science-based nursing (pp. 105-115). New York: National League for Nursing.
3.
Barrett, E. A. M. (1994). Rogerian scientists, artists, revolutionaries. In M. Madrid & E. A. M. Barrett (Eds.), Rogers’ scientific art of nursing practice (pp. 61-87). New York: National League for Nursing.
4.
Barrett, E. A. M., Caroselli, C., Smith, A. S., & Smith, D. W. (1997). Power as knowing participation in change: Theoretical, practice, and methodological issues, insights, and ideas. In M. Madrid (Ed.), Patterns of Rogerian knowing (pp. 31-46). New York: National League for Nursing.
5.
Caroselli, C. (1995). Power and feminism: A nursing science perspective. Nursing Science Quarterly, 8, 115-119.
6.
Chinn, P. (2000). From the editor. Advances in Nursing Science, 23(1), v.
7.
Cowling, W. R. (2001). Unitary appreciative inquiry. Advances in Nursing Science, 23(4), 32-48.
8.
Ellis-Stoll, C., & Popkess-Vawter, S. (1998). A concept analysis on the process of empowerment. Advances in Nursing Science, 21(2), 62-68.
9.
Freire, P. (1981). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum Publishing. (Original work published 1968)
10.
Fulton, Y. (1997). Nurses’ views on empowerment: A critical social theory perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 529-536.
11.
Gibson, C. H. (1991). A concept analysis of empowerment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16, 344-561.
12.
Gutierrez, L. (1995). Understanding the empowerment process: Does consciousness make a difference?Social Work Research, 19, 229-237.
13.
Hawks, J. (1992). Empowerment in nursing education: Concept analysis and application to philosophy, learning and instruction. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 609-618.
14.
Hess, J. (1996). The ethics of compliance: A dialectic. Advances in Nursing Science, 19(1), 18-27.
15.
Holmes, G., & Saleeby, D. (1993). Empowerment, the medical model, and the politics of clienthood. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 4(1), 61-78.
16.
Kane, D., & Thomas, B. (2000). Nursing and the “F” word. Nursing Forum, 35(2), 17-24.
17.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
18.
Kieffer, C. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 9-36.
19.
Kirkley, D. (2000). Is motherhood good for women? A feminist exploration. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 29, 459-464.
20.
Kuokkanen, L., Leino-Kilpi, H., & Katajisto, J. (2002). Do nurses feel empowered? Nurses’ assessment of their own qualities and performance with regard to nurse empowerment. Journal of Professional Nursing, 18, 328-335.
21.
Labonte, R. (1989). Community and professional empowerment. Canadian Nurse, 85(3), 23-28.
22.
Labonte, R. (1994). Health promotion and empowerment: Reflections on professional practice. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 253-268.
23.
Lerner, R. (1997). Concepts and theories of human development (2nd ed.). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
Leyshon, S. (2002). Empowering practitioners: An unrealistic expectation of nurse education?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40, 466-474.
25.
Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (1997). Improving health through community organization and community building. In K. Glanz, F. Lewis, & B. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 241-269). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Newman, M. (1990). Shifting to higher consciousness. In M. Parker (Ed.), Nursing theories in practice (pp. 129-139). New York: National League for Nursing.
28.
Newman, M. (1997). Evolution of the theory of health as expanding consciousness. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 22-25.
29.
Nyatanga, L., & Dann, K. L. (2002). Empowerment in nursing: The role of philosophical and psychological factors. Nursing Philosophy, 3, 234-239.
30.
Parse, R. R. (1987). Paradigms and theories. In R. R. Parse (Ed.), Nursing science: Major paradigms, theories, and critiques (pp. 1-11). Philadelphia: Saunders.
31.
Parse, R. R. (1992). Human becoming: Parse’s theory of nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 35-42.
32.
Ramphele, M. (1997). Whither feminism? In J. Scott, C. Kaplan, & D. Keates (Eds.), Transitions, environments, translations (pp. 334-338). New York: Routledge.
33.
Rappaport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 1-7.
34.
Reed, P. G. (1986). The developmental conceptual framework: Nursing reformulations and applications for family theory. In A. Whall (Ed.), Family therapy theory for nursing: Four approaches (pp. 69-92). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
35.
Reed, P. G. (1997a). Nursing: The ontology of the discipline. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 76-79.
36.
Reed, P. G. (1997b). The place of transcendence in nursing’s science of unitary human beings: Theory and research. In M. Madrid (Ed.), Patterns of Rogerian knowing (pp. 187-196). New York: National League for Nursing.
37.
Rogers, M. E. (1980). A science of unitary man. In J. P. Riehl & C. Roy (Eds.), Conceptual models for nursing practice (2nd ed., pp. 329-337). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
38.
Rogers, M. E. (1990). Nursing: Science of unitary, irreducible, human beings: Update 1990. In E. A. M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions of Rogers’ science-based nursing (pp. 5-11). New York: National League for Nursing.
39.
Rogers, M. E. (1992). Nursing science and space age. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 27-34.
40.
Ryles, S. (1999). A concept analysis of empowerment: Its relationship to mental health nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 600-607.
41.
Tong, R. (2001). A millennial feminist vision. In J. P. Sterba (Ed.), Controversies in feminism (pp. 173-195). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
42.
Whall, A. (1980). Congruence between existing theories of family functioning and nursing theories. Advances in Nursing Science, 3(1), 59-67.
