Barrett, E.A.M. (1990). Rogerian patterns of scientific inquiry. In E.A.M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions of Rogers’ science-based nursing (pp. 169-187). New York: National League for Nursing.
2.
Butcher, H.K. (1998). Crystallizing the processes of the unitary field pattern portrait research method. Visions: The Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science, 6, 13-26.
Cox, T. (2003). A nurse-statistician reanalyzes data from the Rosa therapeutic touch study. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 9(1), 58-64.
5.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method (3rd ed.). New York: Verso.
6.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Lakatos, I. , & Musgrave, A. (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Millman, D. (2000). Living on purpose: Straight answers to life’s tough questions. Novato, CA: New World Library.
9.
Orem, D.E. (1997). Views of human beings specific to nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 26-31.
10.
Oxford University Press . (1996). The Oxford dictionary and thesaurus: American edition. New York: Author.
11.
Parse, R.R. (1987). Nursing Science: Major paradigms, theories, and critiques. Philadelphia: Saunders.
12.
Parse, R.R. (2001). Qualitative inquiry: The path of sciencing. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
13.
Phillips, J. (1988). The reality of nursing research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1, 48-49.
14.
Popper, K. (1970). Normal science and its dangers. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 51-58). London, England: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Rogers, M.E. (1992). Nursing science and the space age. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 27-34.
16.
Rosa, L. , Rosa, E., Sarner, L., & Barrett, S. (1998). A close look at therapeutic touch. JAMA, 279, 1005-1010.
17.
Roy, C. (1997). Future of the Roy model: Challenge to redefine adaptation. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 42-48.
