The purpose of this study was to test a mediational model, developed within the science of unitary human beings, by examining the relationship between humor and eudaimonistic health conception in early adolescents and by examining the extent to which perceived field motion mediated this relationship. The sample consisted of 136 adolescents, aged 12 to 14, who responded to instruments measuring humor, perceived field motion, and eudaimonistic health conception in classroom settings. Correlational analysis supported the three hypothesized relationships. Regression analyses indicated that perceived field motion was one mediator of the relationship between humor and eudaimonistic health conception.
Baron, R. N. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social-psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2.
Barrett, E.A.M. (1984). An empirical investigation of Martha E. Rogers’s principle of helicy: The relationship of human field motion and power (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45,615A.
3.
Black, D. W. (1984). Laughter. Journal of the American Medical Association, 252, 2995-2998.
4.
Carroll, J. L. (1990). The relationship between humor appreciation and perceived physical health. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 27, 34-37.
5.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Cousins, N. (1979). Anatomy of an illness as perceived by the patient. New York: W. W. Norton.
7.
DiIorio, C. , Faherty, B., & Manteuffel, B. (1991). Cognitive-perceptual factors associated with antiepileptic medication compliance. Research in Nursing and Health, 14, 329-338.
8.
Elliott, G. R. , & Feldman, S. S. (1990). Capturing the adolescent experience. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 1-53). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Felton, G. M. , Parsons, M. A., & Bartoces, M. G. (1997). Demographic factors: Interaction effects on health-promoting behavior and health related factors. Public Health Nursing, 14, 361-367.
10.
Hill, L. , & Smith, N. (1990). Self-care nursing: Promotion of health (2nd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange.
11.
Kuiper, N. A. , Martin, R. A., Olinger, L. J., Kazarian, S. S., & Jette, J. L. (1998). Sense of humor, self-concept, and psychological well-being in psychiatric patients. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 11, 357-381.
12.
Laffrey, S. C. (1986). Development of a health conception scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 9, 107-113.
13.
Lusk, S. L. , Kerr, M. J., & Baer, L. M. (1995). Psychometric testing of the reduced Laffrey Health Conception Scale. American Journal of Health Promotion, 9, 219-224.
14.
Metcalf, C. W. (1987). Humor, life, and death. Oncology Nursing Forum, 14,19-21.
15.
Moody, R. A. (1978). Laugh after laugh: The healing power of humor. Jacksonville, FL: Headwaters Press.
16.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Rawnsley, M. M. (1985). H-E-A-L-T-H: A Rogerian perspective. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 3, 25-29.
18.
Robinson, V. M. (1991). Humor and the health professions: The therapeutic use of humor in health care (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
19.
Rogers, M. E. (1970). An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
20.
Rogers, M. E. (1980). Nursing: The science of unitary man. In J. P. Riehl & S. C. Roy (Eds.), Conceptual models for nursing practice (2nd ed., pp. 329-337). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
21.
Rogers, M. E. (1986). Science of unitary human beings. In V. Malinski (Ed.), Explorations on Martha Rogers’s science of unitary human beings (pp. 3-8). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
22.
Rogers, M. E. (1988). Nursing science and art: A prospective. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1, 99-102.
23.
Rogers, M. E. (1990). Nursing: Science of unitary, irreducible, human beings: Update 1990. In E.A.M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions of Rogers’s science-based nursing (pp. 5-11). New York: National League for Nursing.
24.
Rogers, M. E. (1992). Nursing science and the space age. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 27-34.
25.
Rogers, M. E. (1994). The science of unitary human beings: Current perspectives. Nursing Science Quarterly, 7, 33-35.
26.
Thorson, J. A. , Brdar, I., & Powell, F. C. (1997). Factor-analytic study of sense of humor in Croatia and the USA. Psychological Reports, 81, 971-977.
27.
Thorson, J. A. , & Powell, F. C. (1993a). Development and validation of a multidimensional sense of humor scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 13-23.
28.
Thorson, J. A. , & Powell, F. C. (1993b). Sense of humor and dimensions of personality. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 799-809.
29.
Thorson, J. A. , Powell, F. C., Sarmany-Schuller, I., & Hampes, W. P. (1997). Psychological health and sense of humor. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 605-619.
30.
Yarcheski, A. , & Mahon, N. E. (1991). An empirical test of Rogers’ original and revised theory of correlates in adolescents. Research in Nursing and Health, 14, 447-455.
31.
Yarcheski, A. , & Mahon, N. E. (1995). Rogers’s pattern manifestations and health in adolescents. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 17, 383-397.
