Nursing has long been associated with the natural sciences. However, more recently some nurses have begun to identify it as a human science. The epistemological and ontological bases then shift, with clear implications for the research approaches that are regarded as the most useful. This column offers a discussion of the worldviews represented in contemporary nursing knowledge, focusing particularly on the newer paradigm that includes the view of nursing as a human science, and the place of qualitative and quantitative research. Neither the human sciences nor the natural sciences are seen as providing a sufficient base for all nursing knowledge. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches are viewed as potentially useful strategies given the nature of the phenomenon to be explored. Parallels to current discussions of worldviews and research methods in transpersonal psychology are identified.
Anderson, R. (1998). Introduction. In W. Braud & R. Anderson (Eds.), Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honoring human experience (pp. xix-xxxi). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Anderson, R. , & Braud, W. (1998). Additional suggestions, ethical considerations, and future challenges. In W. Braud & R. Anderson (Eds.), Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honoring human experience (pp. 238-255). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Barrett, E.A.M. (1986). Investigation of the principle of helicy: The relationship of human field motion and power. In V. M. Malinski (Ed.), Explorations on Martha Rogers’ science of unitary human beings (pp. 173-184). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4.
Barrett, E.A.M. (1996). Canonical correlation analysis and its use in Rogerian research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 9, 50-52.
5.
Barrett, E.A.M. (1998). A Rogerian practice methodology for health patterning. Nursing Science Quarterly, 11, 136-138.
6.
Boykin, A. , & Schoenhofer, S. O. (2001). Nursing as caring: A model for transforming practice. Boston: Jones & Bartlett.
7.
Braud, W. , & Anderson, R. (1998). Conventional and expanded views of research. In W. Braud & R. Anderson (Eds.), Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honoring human experience (pp. 3-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Butcher, H. (1998). Crystallizing the process of the unitary field portrait research method. Visions: The Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science, 6, 13-26.
9.
Carboni, J. T. (1992). Instrument development and the measurement of unitary constructs. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 134-142.
10.
Carboni, J. T. (1995). A Rogerian process of inquiry. Nursing Science Quarterly, 8, 22-37.
11.
Cowling, W. R. (1986). The science of unitary human beings: Theoretical issues, methodological challenges, and research realities. In V. M. Malinski (Ed.), Explorations on Martha Rogers’ science of unitary human beings (pp. 65-77). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12.
Cowling, W. R. (2001). Unitary appreciative inquiry. Advances in Nursing Science, 23(4), 32-48.
13.
Fawcett, J. (1994). Theory development using quantitative methods in the science of unitary human beings. In M. Madrid & E.A.M. Barrett (Eds.), Rogers’ scientific art of nursing practice (pp. 369-379). New York: National League for Nursing.
14.
Fawcett, J. (2000). Analysis and evaluation of contemporary nursing knowledge: Nursing models and theories. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
15.
Ference, H. M. (1986). The relationship of time experience, creativity traits, differentiation, and human field motion. In V. M. Malinski (Ed.), Explorations on Martha Rogers’ science of unitary human beings (pp. 95-105). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
16.
Madrid, M. , & Winstead-Fry, P. (1986). Rogers’ conceptual model. In P. Winstead-Fry (Ed.), Case studies in nursing theory (pp. 73-102). New York: National League for Nursing.
17.
Malinski, V. M. (1986). Further ideas from Martha Rogers. In V. M. Malinski (Ed.), Explorations on Martha Rogers’ science of unitary human beings (pp. 9-14). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
18.
Mitchell, G. J. , & Cody, W. K. (1992). Nursing knowledge and human science: Ontological and epistemological considerations. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 54-61.
19.
Newman, M. (1990). Newman’s theory of health as praxis. Nursing Science Quarterly, 3, 37-41.
20.
Newman, M. A. , Sime, A. M., & Corcoran-Perry, S. A. (1991). The focus of the discipline of nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 14(1), 1-6.
21.
Paletta, J. L. (1990). The relationship of temporal experience to human time. In E.A.M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions of Rogers’ science-based nursing (pp. 239-253). New York: National League for Nursing.
22.
Parse, R. R. (1987). Nursing science: Major paradigms, theories, and critiques. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
23.
Parse, R. R. (2001). Qualitative inquiry: The path of sciencing. Boston: Jones & Bartlett.
24.
Polit, D. E. , & Hungler, B. P. (1995). Nursing research: Principles and methods (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
25.
Reeder, F. (1993). The science of unitary human beings and interpretive science. Nursing Science Quarterly, 6, 13-24.
26.
Rogers, M. E. (1970). An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
27.
Rogers, M. E. (1986). Science of unitary human beings. In V. M. Malinski (Ed.), Explorations on Martha Rogers’ science of unitary human beings (pp. 3-8). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
28.
Rogers, M. E. (1992). Nursing science and the space age. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 27-34.
29.
Rogers, M. E. (1994). Nursing science evolves. In M. Madrid & E.A.M. Barrett (Eds.), Rogers’ scientific art of nursing practice (pp. 3-9). New York: National League for Nursing.
30.
Sherman, D. W. (1997). Rogerian science: Opening new frontiers of nursing knowledge through its application in quantitative research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 131-135.
31.
Watson, J. , Barrett, E.A.M., Hastings-Tolsma, M., Johnston, L., & Gueldner, S. (1997). Measurement in Rogerian science: A review of selected instruments. In M. Madrid (Ed.), Patterns of Rogerian knowing (pp. 87-99). New York: National League for Nursing.
