American Nurses’ Association . (1980). Nursing: A social policy statement. Kansas City, MO: Author.
2.
Fawcett, J. (1984). The metaparadigm of nursing: Present status and future refinements. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 16, 84-87.
3.
Gortner, S. R. (1993). Nursing’s syntax revisited: A critique of philosophies said to influence nursing theories. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 30, 477-488.
4.
Kim, H. S. (1987). Structuring the nursing knowledge system: A typology of four domains. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 1, 111-114.
5.
Kitson, A. L. (1997). Johns Hopkins Address: Does nursing have a future?Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 29, 111-115.
6.
Nagle, L. M. , & Mitchell, G. J. (1991). Theoretic diversity: Evolving paradigmatic issues in research and practice. Advances in Nursing Science, 14, 17-25.
7.
Neuman, B. (1995). The Neuman systems model (3rd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
8.
Orem, D. (1995). Nursing: Concepts of practice (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
9.
Parse, R. R. (1998). The human becoming school of thought: A perspective for nurses and other health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Rogers, M. E. (1970). An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
11.
Rogers, M. E. (1992). Nursing and the space age. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 27-33.
12.
Roy, C. , & Andrews, H. A. (1997). The Roy adaptation model: The definitive statement. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
13.
Yura, H. , & Torres, G. (1975). Today’s conceptual frameworks with the baccalaureate nursing programs (NLN Pub. No. 15-1558, pp. 17-75). New York: National League for Nursing.