Critical management studies is an increasingly popular specialization in organizational studies. It looks like a promising area of study, especially for scholars in organizational communication. In this essay, the authors explore the issues and tensions of critical management studies. The authors review five recent books, each of which, they argue, makes a particular contribution to the shape and direction of critical management studies, and they comment on the issues these texts raise for further consideration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvesson, M. , & Deetz, S. (1996). Critical theory and postmodermism approaches to organizational studies. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 191-217). London: Sage Ltd.
2.
Alvesson, M. , & Willmott, H. (1992). Critical management studies. London: Sage Ltd.
3.
Alvesson, M. , & Willmott, H. (1996). Making sense of management: A critical introduction. London: Sage Ltd.
4.
Arato, A. , & Gebhardt, E. (1978). The essential Frankfurt school reader. New York: Urizen Books.
5.
Ashcraft, K. , & Pacanowsky, M. (1996). "A woman's worst enemy": Reflections on a narrative of organizational life and female identity. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 217-239.
6.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulcra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
Boje, D. M. , Gephart, R. P., Jr., & Thatchenkery, T. J. (Eds.). (1996). Postmodern management and organization theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Booth, C. (1996). The (dis)organization of ephemera? A review of the critical management network. Electronic Journal of Radical Organizational Theory (EJROT), 2(1). Available: http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrot/
9.
Buzzanell, P. M. (1994). Gaining a voice: Feminist perspectives in organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 339-383.
10.
Clair, R. (1993). The use of framing devices to sequester organizational narratives: Hegemony and harassment. Communication Monographs, 60, 113-136.
11.
Clegg, S. R. (1990). Modern organization: Organization studies in the postmodern world. London: Sage Ltd.
12.
Clegg, S. R. , & Palmer, G. (Eds.). (1996). The politics of management knowledge. London: Sage Ltd.
13.
Collinson, D. L. , & Hearn, J. (Eds.). (1996). Men as mangers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities and managements. London: Sage Ltd.
14.
Cooper, R. , & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodemism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 9, 91-112.
15.
Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in the age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: SUNY.
16.
Deetz, S. , & Kersten, A. (1983). Critical models of interpretative research. In L. Putnam & M. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations (pp. 147-171). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Deetz, S. , & Mumby, D. (1990). Power, discourse, and the workplace: Reclaiming the critical tradition in communication studies in organizations. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 13, pp. 18-47). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Eisenberg, E. (1996). Hearing voices: Speculations on the future of our disciplines. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 124-130.
19.
Fleming, V. (Director). (1939). The wizard of oz [Film]. (Available from Metro-GoldwynMeyer [MGM] Studios, Hollywood, CA.)
20.
Gergen, K. (1992). Organization theory in the postmodem era In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organizations (pp. 209-226). London: Sage.
21.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. London: Heinemann.
22.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 2. Lifeworld and system: A critique offiunctionalist reason. London: Heinemann.
23.
Hearn, J. , & Parkin, W. (1983). Gender and organizations: A selective review and a critique of a neglected area. Organization Studies, 4, 219-242.
24.
Held, D. (1980). Introduction to critical theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Holmer-Nadesan, M. (1996). Organizational identity and space of action. Organization Studies, 17, 49-81.
26.
Irigaray, L. (1985). The sex which is not one. (C. Porter with C. Burke, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
27.
Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Jay, M. (1986). Permanent exiles: Essays on the intellectual migration from Germany to America. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
Linstead, S. , Grafton Small, R., & Jeffcutt, P. (Eds.). (1996). Understanding management. London: Sage Ltd.
30.
Mumby, D. (1993). Critical organizational studies: The next 10 years. Communication Monographs, 60, 18-25.
31.
Mumby, D. (1997). Modernism, postmodernism, and communication studies: A rereading of an ongoing debate. Communication Theory, 7, 1-28.
32.
Mumby, D. , & Clair, R. (1997). Organizational discourse. In van Dijk, T. (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 181-205). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Mumby, D. , & Putnam, L. (1992). The politics of emotion: A feminist reading of bounded rationality. Academy of Management Review, 17, 465-486.
34.
Mumby, D. , & Stohl, C. (1996). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 50-72.
35.
Nkomo, S. (1992). "The emperor has no clothes": Rewriting "race" in the study of organizations. Academy of Management Review, 17, 487-513.
36.
Nkomo, S. , & Cox T., Jr. (1996). Diverse identities in organizations. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 338-356). London: Sage Ltd.
37.
Nord, W. , & Jermier, J. (1992). Critical social science formanagers? Promising and perverse possibilities. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies (pp. 202-222). London: Sage Ltd.
38.
Prasad, P. (1997). Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Putnam, L. (1983). The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functionalism. In L. Putnam & M. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations (pp. 31-54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Reardon, K. (1996). The crossroads of organizational communication: Definition or dichotomy. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 106-111.
41.
Redding, W. C. (1985). Stumbling toward identity: The emergence of organizational communication as a field of study. In R. McPhee & P. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions (pp. 15-54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
Sotirin, P. , & Gottfried, H. (in press). The ambivalent dynamics of secretarial "bitching": Control, resistance, and the construction of identity. Organization.
43.
Taylor, J. (1993). Rethinking the theory of organizational communication: How to read an organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44.
Trethewey, A. (1997). Resistance, identity, and empowerment: A postmodern feminist analysis of clients in a human service organization. Communication Monographs, 64, 281-301.
45.
Turner, V. (1982). From ritual to theater: The human seriousness of play. New York: Performiing Arts Journal Publications.
46.
Van de Ven, A. (1998). Invitation to preconference professional development activities. Academy of Management News, 28, 1-1, 12-19.
47.
Wanca-Thibault, M. , & Tompkins, P. K. (1998). Speaking like a man (and a woman) about organizational communication: Feminization and feminism as a recognizable voice. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 606-621.
48.
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of an interpretive sociology (Vols. 1-3, G. Roth & C. Wittich, Trans.). New York: Bedminster.
49.
Weiskopf, R. , & Willmott, H. (1996). Turning the given into a question: Acritical discussion of Chia's organizational analysis as deconstructive practice, 1996. Electronic Journal of Radical Organizational Theory (EJROT), 3(2). Available: http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrotl/
