Using a case study based on interviews and documents, this article applies narrative theory and methods to garbage can decision theory. Narrative approaches to organizational action offer insight into how decisions and actions occur in organizations. Following narrative theory, organizational decision making may be understood as the interweaving of multiple, ongoing, and unending narratives that constitute organizational decision makers. Narrative analyses also accommodate the complexity of organizational decisions and actions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderfer, C. P. (1988). Taking our selves seriously as researchers. In D. N. Berg & K. K. Smith (Eds.), The self in social inquiry: Researching methods (pp. 35-70). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Arnold, T. W. (1937). The folklore of capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
Cohen, M. D. , March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 30-42.
4.
Conrad, C. (1983). Organizational power: Faces and symbolic forms. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsy (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 173-195). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
Cyert, R. M. , & March, J. G. (1992). A behavioral theory of the firn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6.
Dandridge, T. (1983). Symbols' function and use. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, & T. C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 69-79). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
7.
Deetz, S. , & Kersten, A. (1983). Critical models of interpretive research. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 147-172). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Frost, P. J. (1987). Power, politics, and influence. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 503-548). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Ghent, W. J. (1903). Our benevolentfeudalism. New York: Macmillan.
10.
Graham, L. (1992). Archival research in intertextual analysis: Four representations of the life of Dr. Lillian Moller Gilbreth. In C. Ellis & M. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 31-52). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Haidu, P. (1993). The subject of violence: The Song of Roland and the birth of the state. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12.
Harre, R. (1993). Social being. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
13.
Hauerwas, S. , & Burrell, D. (1989). From system to story: An alternative pattern for rationality in ethics. In S. Hauerwas & L. G. Jones (Eds.), Why narrative? Readings in narrative theology (pp. 158-190). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
14.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper.
15.
Johnson, M. (1993). The moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Kristeva, J. (1986). The Kristeva reader. (Ed., T. Moi). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
17.
Linde, C. (1993). Life stories: The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Maclntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
19.
March, J. G. (1981). Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. In A. H. Van de Ven & W. F. Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior (pp. 205-244). New York: Wiley.
20.
March, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Free Press.
21.
March, J. G. , & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
22.
March, J. G. , & Shapira, Z. (1982). Behavioral decision theory and organizational decision theory. In G. R. Ungson, G. R., & D. N. Braunstein (Eds.), Decision making: An interdisciplinary inquiry (pp. 92-115). Boston: Kent.
23.
Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
O'Connor, E. S. (1995). Paradoxes of participation: Textual analysis and organizational change. Organization Studies, 16(5), 769-803.
25.
O'Connor, E. S. (1996). Telling decisions: The role of narrative in organizational decision making. In Z. Shapira (Ed.), Organizational decision making (pp. 304-323). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599-620.
28.
Riffaterre, M. (1990). Compulsory reader response: The intertextual drive. In M. Worten & J. Still (Eds.), Intertextuality: Theories and practices (pp. 71-93). Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press.
29.
Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30.
Rosen, M. (1985). Breakfast at Spiro's: Dramaturgy and dominance. Journal of Management, 11, 31-48.
31.
Rosen, M. (1988). You asked forit: Christmas at the bosses' expense. Journal of Management Studies, 25(5), 463-480.
32.
Scott, W. , & Hart, D. (1989). Organizational values in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
33.
Shaw, G. (1993). The shape of our field: Business communication as a hybrid discipline. Journal of Business Communication, 30(3), 297-313.
34.
Taylor, J. R. , Cooren, F., Giroux, W., & Robichaud, D. (1996). The communicational basis of organization: Between the conversation and the text. Communication Theory, 6(1), 1-39.
35.
Todorov, T. (1982). Theories of the symbol. (Trans. C. Porter). New York: Cornell University Press.
36.
Tompkins, P. , & Cheney, G. (1983). Account analysis of organizations: Decision making and identification. In L. L. Putnam & M. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 123-146). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
Watzlawick, P. , Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton.
38.
Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
39.
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
White, H. (1987). The content of theform: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
