An estimated 26 million workers are electronically monitored by organizations. Contradictory evidence indicates that such monitoring may lead to either positive or negative outcomes for both organizations and their members. This article applies theories of organizational justice and concertive control to account for these contradictions. It is argued that, when organizations involve employees in the design and implementation of monitoring systems, restrict monitoring to performance-related activities, and use data obtained through electronic means in a concertive manner by emphasizing two-way communication and supportive feedback, they are likely to reap positive results. However, when employees are not involved in the introduction of monitoring, when data gathered through electronic performance monitoring are used to provide coercive, obtrusive feedback, or when monitoring includes nonwork activities, the organization may experience negative results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiello, J. R. (1993). Computer-based work monitoring: Electronic surveillance and its effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 499-507.
2.
Aiello, J. R. , & Kolb, K. J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339-353.
3.
Aiello, J. R. , & Svec, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 537-548.
4.
Alexander, S. , & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177-198.
5.
Amick, B. C. , & Smith, M. J. (1992). Stress, computer-based work monitoring and measurement systems: A conceptual overview. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 6-16.
6.
Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Brockner, J. , Grover, S., Reed, T., DeWitt, R., & O'Malley, M. (1987). Survivors' reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help for our friends. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 526-541.
8.
Brockner, J. , Tyler, T. R., & Cooper-Schneider, R. (1992). The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness: The higher they are, the harder they fall. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 241-261.
9.
Bullis, C. (1991). Communication practices as unobtrusive control: An observational study. Communication Studies, 42, 254-271.
10.
Bullis, C. , & Tompkins, P. K. (1989). The forest ranger revisited: A study of control practices and identification. Communication Monographs, 56, 287-305.
11.
Bylinsky, G. (1991, November 4). How companies spy on employees. Fortune, pp. 131-140.
12.
Clegg, S. (1993). Narrative, power, and social theory. In D. K. Mumby (Ed.), Narrative and social control: Critical perspectives (pp. 15-45). Newbury Park: Sage.
13.
CWA calls monitoring “menace.” (1994, June 24). Communications Daily, pp. 3-5.
14.
DeNisi, A. S. , Cafferty, T. P., & Meglino, B. M. (1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 360-396.
15.
DeTienne, K. B. , & Abbott, N. T. (1993, August). Developing an employee centered electronic monitoring system. Journal of Systems Management, pp. 12-15.
16.
DeTienne, K. B. , & Alder, G. S. (1995). The privacy for consumers and workers act: Panacea or problem?Managerial Law, 37(2/3), 1-32.
17.
Edwards, D. (1979). Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Eisenman, E. (1986). Employee perceptions and supervisory behaviors in clerical VDT work performed on systems that allow electronic monitoring (OTA-CIT-333). Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment. (NTIS No. PB88-156351)
19.
Fenner, D. B. , Lerch, F. J., & Kulik, C. T. (1993). The impact of computerized performance monitoring and prior performance knowledge on performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 573-601.
20.
Fickel, L. (1991, May 13). Don't look now, but...: A new crop of network products is forcing a debate over workplace monitoring. Infoworld, pp. 50-55.
21.
Folger, R. , & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
22.
Fryxell, G. E. , & Gordon, M. E. (1989). Workplace justice and job satisfaction as predictors of satisfaction with union and management. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 851-866.
23.
Galvin, K. (1993, June 22). Boston hotel worker tells Senate of video invasion of privacy. States, p. 1.
24.
Garson, B. (1988). The electronic sweatshop. New York: Simon & Schuster.
25.
Gerdelman, J. (1993, June 22). Statement before the Subcommittee on Employment and Productivity, Committee on Labor and Human Resources, United States Senate. Washington, DC: United States Senate.
26.
Grant, R. A. , & Higgins, C. A. (1989, Spring). Monitoring service workers via computer: The effect on employees, productivity, and service. National Productivity Review, pp. 101-112.
27.
Grant, R. A. , Higgins, C. A., & Irving, R. H. (1988). Computerized performance monitors: Are they costing you customers?Sloan Management Review, 29(3), 39-45.
28.
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342.
29.
Greenberg, J. (1988). Cultivating an image of justice: Looking fair on the job. Academy of Management Executive, 2, 155-157.
30.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
31.
Griffith, T. L. (1993). Monitoring and performance: A comparison of computer and supervisor monitoring. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 549-572.
32.
Hawk, S. R. (1994). The effects of computerized performance monitoring: An ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 949-957.
33.
Henriques, V. E. (1986a). Computer monitoring: Boon to employee and manager?Computerworld, 20, 17.
34.
Henriques, V. E. (1986b). In defense of computer monitoring. Training, 23, 120.
35.
Irving, R. H. , Higgins, C. A., & Safayeni, F. R. (1986). Computerized performance monitoring systems: Use and abuse. Communications of the ACM, 29, 794-801.
36.
Kallman, E. (1993, June). Electronic monitoring of employees: Issues and guidelines. Journal of Systems Management, pp. 17-21.
37.
Kaufman, H. (1960). The forest ranger: A study in administrative behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
Kidwell, R. E. , & Bennett, N. (1994). Employee reactions to electronic control systems: The role of procedural fairness. Group and Organization Management, 19, 203-218.
39.
Laabs, J. J. (1992, June). Surveillance: Tool or trap? The use of electronic surveillance equipment to monitor employee performance. Personnel Journal, pp. 96-104.
40.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationship. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
41.
Lind, E. A. , & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
42.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. New York: Macmillan.
43.
Marx, G. T. (1990, March-April). The case of the omniscient organization. Harvard Business Review, pp. 12-31.
44.
Marx, G. T. (1992, April 20). Let's eavesdrop on managers. Computerworld, p. 29.
45.
McCarthy, P. (1986). Effects of feedback on the self confidence of men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 840-847.
46.
Mulgan, G. J. (1991). Communication and control. New York: Guilford.
47.
Nebeker, D. M. , & Tatum, C. B. (1993). The effects of computer monitoring, standards, and rewards on work performance, job satisfaction, and stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 508-536.
48.
9 to 5, Working Women Education Fund . (1990). Stories of mistrust and manipulation: The electronic monitoring of the American workforce. Cleveland, OH: Author.
49.
Noe, A. (1988). Women and mentoring: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 13, 65-78.
50.
Nussbaum, K. , & duRivage, V. (1986, Winter). Computer monitoring: Mismanagement by remote control. Business and Society Review, pp. 16-20.
51.
Piturro, M. C. (1989). Employee performance monitoring... or meddling?Management Review, 78(5), 31-33.
52.
Reynolds, L. (1993, February). Debate is brewing over employees' right to privacy. HR Focus, pp. 1-4.
53.
Ross, S. (1992, September 15). Big brother in workplace growing bigger every day. Reuter Business Report, pp. 11-12.
54.
Sanders, A. L. (1990, January 8). Reach out and tape someone. Time, p. 55.
55.
Simon, H. (1976). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.
56.
Smith, M. J. , Sainfort, P., Rogers, K., & Legrande, D. (1990). Electronic performance monitoring and job stress in telecommunications jobs. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Industrial Engineering.
57.
Susser, P. A. (1988). Electronic monitoring in the private sector: How closely should employers supervise their workers?Employee Relations Law Journal, 13, 575-598.
58.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflicts. In W. G. Austin & S. Worschel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
59.
Tompkins, P. K. (1990). On risk communication as interorganizational control: The case of the aviation safety reporting system. In A. Kirby (Ed.), Nothing to fear: Risks and hazards in American society (pp. 203-239). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
60.
Tompkins, P. K. , & Cheney, G. (1983). Account analysis of organizations: Decision making and identification. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 123-146). Beverly Hills: Sage.
61.
Tompkins, P. K. , & Cheney, G. (1985). Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organizations. In R. McPhee & P. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions (pp. 179-210). Beverly Hills: Sage.
62.
Tucker, T. (1992, October). Keeping tabs: Call accounting saves money and more. A lot more. Teleconnect, pp. 94-100.
63.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment . (1987). The electronic supervisor: New technology, new tensions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
64.
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
65.
Westin, A. F. (1986). Privacy and quality of work-life issues in employee monitoring (OTA-CIT-333). Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment. (NTIS No. PB88-156351)
66.
Witt, L. R. (1992, Spring). Terminally nosy: Are employers free to access our electronic mail?Dickinson Law Review, 545-571.
