In our desire to rid our corporations of excessive structure, we may have gone too far. Some elements of structure are essential if organizations, and teams working within these organizations, are to achieve their goals. This commentary provides an overview of two aspects of structure that are necessary in team-centered organizations: an internal facilitative structure appropriate for each team's specific needs and an organizational framework that supports teamwork in general. Managers and team leaders should be proactive in ensuring that essential structural components are in place.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ancona, D. (1990). Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 334-365.
2.
AT&T breaks up (again) . (1995, September 21). USA Today, pp. B1-B2.
3.
AT&T names its gear business Lucent, releases data on growth before spinoff . (1996, February 6). The Wall Street Journal, p. B5.
4.
Baker, H. (1979). The hows and whys of team building. Personnel Journal, 58, 367-370.
5.
Barge, J. (1994). Leadership: Communication skills for organizations and groups. New York: St. Martin's.
6.
Cannon-Bowers, J. , Tannenbaum, S., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing training requirements. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Dumaine, B. (1991, June 17). The bureaucracy busters. Fortune, 36-50.
8.
Fiorelli, J. (1988). Power in work groups: Team members' perspectives. Human Relations, 41, 1-12.
9.
Glaser, S. (1994). Teamwork and communication: A 3-year case study of change. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 282-296.
10.
Gordon, J. (1994, August). The team troubles that won't go away. Training, 31(8), 25-34.
11.
Gouran, D. (1986). Inferential errors, interaction, and group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 81-92). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Hackman, J. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
13.
Holpp, L. (1995, March). If empowerment is so good, why does it hurt?Training, 32(3), 52-57.
14.
Hughes, R. , Rosenbach, W., & Clover, W. (1983). Team development in an intact, ongoing work group: A quasi-field experiment. Group and Organization Studies, 8, 161-186.
15.
Industry report vital statistics . (1995, October). Training, 32(10), 55-74.
16.
Ju, Y. , & Cushman, D. (1995). Organizational teamwork in high-speed management. Albany: State University of New York.
17.
Katz, D. , & Kahn, R. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
18.
Kerr, S. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 769-783.
19.
Kerr, S. (1995). An academy classic: On the folly of rewarding A while hoping for B. Academy of Management Executive, 9(1), 7-14.
20.
Klimoski, R. , & Jones, R. (1995). Staffing for effective group decision making: Key issues in matching people and teams. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 291-332). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Kolb, J. A. (1992). Leadership of creative teams. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26, 1-9.
22.
Kolb, J. A. (1993). Leading engineering teams: Leader behaviors related to team performance. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 36, 206-211.
23.
Kolb, J. A. (1995). Leader behaviors affecting team performance: Similarities and differences between leader/member assessments. Journal of Business Communication, 32, 233-248.
24.
Larson, C. , & LaFasto, F. (1989). Teamwork: What must go right; what can go wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Lawler, E. (1994). Total quality management and employee involvement: Are they compatible. Academy of Management Executive, 8(1), 68-76.
26.
Lawrence, P. , & Lorsch, J. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
27.
Leibowitz, S. , & De Meuse, K. (1982). The application of team building. Human Relations, 35, 367-370.
28.
Nahavandi, A. , & Aranda, E. (1994). Restructuring teams for the re-engineered organization. Academy of Management Executive, 8(4), 58-68.
29.
O'Leary-Kelly, A. , Martocchio, J., & Frink, D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285-1301.
30.
Payne, R. (1990). The effectiveness of research teams: A review. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 101-122). New York: Wiley.
31.
Peters, T. (1992). Liberation management. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
32.
Pfeffer, J. (1995). Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. Academy of Management Executive, 9(1), 55-69.
33.
Schnake, M. , Dumler, M., & Cochran, D. (1993). The relationship between “traditional” leadership, “super” leadership, and organizational citizenship behavior. Group & Organization Management, 18, 352-365.
34.
Schriesheim, C. , & Murphy, C. (1976). Relationships between leader behavior and subordinate satisfaction and performance: A test of some situational moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 183-194.
35.
The virtual organization . (1993, February 8). Business Week, 99-102.
36.
Zamanou, S. , & Glaser, S. (1994). Moving toward participation and involvement: Managing and measuring organizational culture. Group & Organization Management, 19, 475-502.
37.
Zigon, J. (1994, June). Making performance appraisal work for team. Training, 31(6), 58-63.
