This article reports on the impact of the perceived motivations of participants of organizational romances, the illicitness of the relationship, and the power of the relational participants upon individual and group performance. Interviews conducted with 128 observers indicated that (a) only certain types of relationships showed associations with either category of organizational effectiveness indexes, (b) illicitness was generally associated with negative outcomes in the work group, but not in the involved individuals, and (c) neither the power of the participants nor the differences in power between them was reliably associated with declines in either individual performance or work group functioning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 413-484). New York: Random House.
2.
Berscheid, E. , & Walster, E. (1978). Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. New York: Wiley.
4.
Chethik, N. (1993, March 13). Romance at office risky. Wisconsin State Journal, P. D1.
5.
Clark, M. S. , & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
6.
Clark, M. S. , & Waddell, B. (1985). Perceptions of exploitation in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 403-418.
7.
Collins, E.G.C. (1983). Managers and lovers. Harvard Business Review, 83, 142-153.
8.
Dillard, J. P. (1986, May). Attitudes and attributions about close relationships in task environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
9.
Dillard, J. P. (1987). Close relationships at work: Perceptions of the motives and performance of relational participants. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 179-194.
10.
Dillard, J. P. , & Broetzmann, S. M. (1989). Romantic relationships at work: Perceived changes in job-related behaviors as a function of participant's motive, partner's motive, and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 93-110.
11.
Dillard, J. P. , & Miller, K. I. (1988). Intimate relationships in task environments. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 449-465). New York: Wiley.
12.
Dillard, J. P. , Segrin, C., & Harden, J. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the interpersonal influence process. Communication Monographs, 56, 19-38.
13.
Dillard, J. P. , & Witteman, H. (1985). Romantic relationships at work: Organizational and personal influences. Human Communication Research, 12, 99-116.
14.
Driscoll, R. , Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 1-10.
15.
Feinberg, M. R. , & Levenstein, A. (1982). Sex and romance in the office and plant. The Wall Street Journal, p. B2.
16.
Goldberg, J. R. (1983, March 21). Mixing work and romance can be risky business. USA Today, p. D6.
17.
Granberry, M. (1986, January 15). Experts warn office romance courts disaster. Albuquerque Journal, p. B1.
18.
Greene, J. O. , Smith, S. W., & Lindsey, A. E. (1990). Memory representations of compliance-gaining strategies and tactics. Human Communication Research, 17, 195-231.
19.
Hendrick, C. , & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402.
20.
Hendrick, C. , Hendrick, S. S., Foote, F. H., & Slapion-Foote, M. J. (1984). Do men and women love differently?Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 1, 177-195.
21.
Hendrick, S. S. , & Hendrick, C. (1987). Love and sex attitudes: A close relationship. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships, 1, 141-169.
22.
Hill, M. (1993, July 15). Fired for dating, couple fights back. Wisconsin State Journal, p. A4.
23.
Hunter, J. E. , & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis and causal models. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 267-320). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
24.
Lee, J. A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, Ontario: New Press.
25.
Lee, J. A. (1977). A typology of styles of loving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 173-182.
26.
Marston, P. J. , Hecht, M. L., & Robers, T. (1987). `True love ways': The subjective experience and communication of romantic love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 387-407.
27.
Norusis, M. J. (1986). SPSS/PC Manual. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
28.
O'Connell, L. (1984). An exploration of exchange in three social relationships: Kinship, friendship, and the marketplace. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 333-345.
29.
Pittman, F. (1989). Private lies: Infidelities and the betrayal of intimacy. New York: Norton.
30.
Quinn, R. E. (1977). Coping with cupid: The formation, impact, and management of romantic relationships in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67, 43-49.
31.
Rubin, R. B. , Perse, E. M., & Barbato, C. A. (1988). Conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication motives. Human Communication Research, 14, 602-628.
32.
Ruble, D. N. , & Ruble, T. N. (1982). Sex stereotypes. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping. New York: Praeger.
33.
Walster, E. , & Walster, G. W. (1978). A new look at love. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
