Based on recent developments in the institutional literature on organization/environment relations, this study explores the relationship between the boundary spanning communication of individual organization members and organizational legitimacy. The research examined this topic in the context of a specific case of organizational conflict between two individual members of the same organization: the head of one of New York State's largest agencies and a dissenting member of that organization's professional staff. Public disagreement between these organization members resulted in substantial opposition to the agency head—a reflection of organizational delegitimation—from an external political coalition. Responding to the primary research question posed in the study, analysis of interview and survey data revealed that perceptions regarding the nature of the boundary spanning communication of the agency head and the staff scientist contributed importantly to the sociopolitical delegitimation of the organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. (1976). The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1175-1199). Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
Adams, J. (1980). Interorganizational processes and organizational boundary activities. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, 321-355.
3.
Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
Aldrich, H. , & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2, 217-230.
5.
Aldrich, H. , & Whetten, D. (1981). Organizations, action-sets, and networks: Making the most of simplicity. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design, Vol. 1 (pp. 385-408). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Burns, T. , & Stalker, G. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
7.
Dandekar, N. (1991). Can whistle-blowing be fully legitimated?Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 10, 88-108.
8.
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
9.
DiMaggio, P. , & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
10.
Dollinger, M. (1984). Environmental boundary spanning and information processing effects on organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 351-368.
11.
Dollinger, M. (1985). Environmental contacts and the financial performance of the small firm. Journal of Small Business Management, 23, 24-30.
12.
Elliston, F. (1982). Civil disobedience and whistle-blowing: A comparative appraisal of two forms of dissent. Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 23-28.
13.
Emery, F. , & Trist, E. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21-32.
14.
Epstein, E. (1980). Business political activity: Research approaches and analytical issues. In L. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy (pp. 1-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
15.
Euske, N. , & Roberts, K. (1987). Evolving perspectives in organization theory: Communication implications. In F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 41-69). New-bury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Fennell, M. , & Alexander, J. (1987). Organizational boundary spanning in institutional environments. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 456-476.
17.
Finet, D. (1988, May). Political success in a pluralistic system: Effects of organizational legitimacy on lobbyists' boundary spanning effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
18.
Fleming, J. (1981). Public issues scanning. In L. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy (pp. 155-173). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
19.
Glazer, M. , & Glazer, P. (1989). The whistleblowers: Exposing corruption in government and industry. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Greenberger, D. , Miceli, M., & Cohen, D. (1987). Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistleblowers and coworkers. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 527-542.
21.
Hannan, M. , & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
22.
Jemison, D. (1984). The importance of boundary spanning roles in strategic decision-making. Journal of Management Studies, 21, 131-152.
23.
Johnson, D. (1986). Confronting corporate power: Strategies and phases of the Nestle boycott. In L. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy (pp. 323-344). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
24.
Katz, R. , & Tushman, M. (1983). A longitudinal study of the effects of boundary spanning supervision on turnover and promotion in research and development. Academy of Management Review, 26, 427-456.
25.
Keller, R. , & Holland, W. (1975). Boundary spanning roles in a research and development organization. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 388-393.
26.
Keller, R. , Szilagyi, A., & Holland, W. (1976). Boundary spanning activity and employee reactions. Human Relations, 29, 699-710.
27.
Lawrence, P. , & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1-47.
28.
Mahon, J. (1983). Corporate political strategies: An empirical study of chemical firm responses to Superfund legislation. In L. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy (pp. 143-182). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
29.
Meadow, R. (1981). The political dimensions of nonproduct advertising. Journal of Communication, 31(3), 69-82.
30.
Meyer, J. , & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
31.
Meyer, J. , & Rowan, B. (1983). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In J. Meyer & W. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 21-44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
Meyer, J. , & Scott, W. (Eds.). (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Miceli, M. (1991). Who blows the whistle and why?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 113-130.
34.
Miles, R. (1987). Managing the corporate social environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35.
Miner, J. (1982). Theories of organizational structure and process. Chicago: Dryden.
36.
Near, J. , & Miceli, M. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1-16.
37.
Parsons, T. (1956). Suggestions for a sociological approach to the study of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 63-85, 225-239.
38.
Paul, K. (1987). Business environment and business ethics: The social, moral, and political dimensions of management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
39.
Pfeffer, J. , & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
40.
Redding, W. C. , & Tompkins, P. K. (1988). Organizational communication: Past and present tenses. In G. Goldhaber & G. Barnett (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 5-33). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41.
Scott, W. (1987a). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
42.
Scott, W. (1987b). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 413-511.
43.
Singh, J. , Tucker, D., & House, R. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171-193.
44.
Spekman, R. (1979). Influence and information: An exploratory analysis of the boundary role person's basis of power. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 104-117.
45.
Stewart, L. (1980). Whistle-blowing: Implications for organizational communication. Journal of Communication, 30, 90-101.
46.
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47.
Tompkins, P. (1982). Communication as action: An introduction to rhetoric and communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
48.
Tushman, M. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 587-605.
49.
Tushman, M. , & Scanlan, T. (1981a). Characteristics and external orientations of boundary spanning individuals. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 83-98.
50.
Tushman, M. , & Scanlan, T. (1981b). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 289-305.
51.
Zucker, L. (Ed.). (1988). Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
