A theoretical framework involving argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and affirming style is employed to predict the degrees of negative affect subordinates report their superiors are willing to stimulate by the use of compliance-gaining message strategies. A model of compliance-gaining message selection by Hunter and Boster was used to derive predictions. A study of subordinates' perceptions of their superiors was conducted to test a model that posits that high verbally aggressive traits of superiors, along with low argumentative and low affirming traits, increases superiors' willingness to stimulate negative affect by the use of compliance-gaining messages, which also reduces subordinates' satisfaction with their superiors. The results of the study produced considerable support for the speculations. The perceived communication traits of superiors predicted reports of the superiors' use of compliance-gaining strategies. These strategies attributed to superiors also predicted subordinates' satisfaction with their supervisors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boster, F. J. , & Levine, T. (1988). Individual differences and compliance gaining message selection: The effects of verbal aggressiveness, argumentativeness, dogmatism and negativism. Communication Research Reports, 5, 114-119.
2.
Boster, F. J. , Levine, T., & Kazoleas, D. (1989, November). The impact of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness on strategic diversity and persistence in compliance-gaining. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco.
3.
Conrad, C. (1983). Power and performance as correlates of supervisors' choice of modes of managing conflict: A preliminary investigation. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 218-228.
4.
Gorden, W. I. , & Infante, D. A. (1987). Employee rights: Content, argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness and career satisfaction. In C.A.B. Osigweh (Ed.), Communicating employee responsibilities and rights: A modern management mandate (pp. 149-163). Westport, CT: Quorum Books, Greenwood.
5.
Gorden, W. I. , Infante, D. A., & Graham, E. E. (1988). Corporate conditions conducive to employee voice: A subordinate perspective. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 101-110.
6.
Gorden, W. I. , Infante, D. A., & Izzo, J. (1988). Variation in voice pertaining to dissatisfaction/satisfaction with subordinates. Management Communication Quarterly, 2, 6-22.
7.
Hirokawa, R. Y. , & Miyahara, A. (1986). A comparison of influence strategies utilized by managers in American Japanese organizations. Communication Quarterly, 34, 250-265.
8.
Hunter, J. , & Boster, F. (1987). A model of compliance-gaining message selection. Communication Monographs, 54, 63-84.
9.
Infante, D. A. (1987). Aggressiveness. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 157-192). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Infante, D. A. , & Gorden, W. I. (1985a). Benefits versus bias: An investigation of argumentativeness, gender, and organizational communication outcomes. Communication Research Reports, 2, 196-201.
11.
Infante, D. A. , & Gorden, W. I. (1985b). Superiors' argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness as predictors of subordinates' satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 12, 117-125.
12.
Infante, D. A. , & Gorden, W. I. (1987). Superior and subordinate communication profiles: Implications for independent-mindedness and upward effectiveness. Central States Speech Journal, 38, 73-80.
13.
Infante, D. A. , & Gorden, W. I. (1989). Argumentativeness and affirming communicator style as predictors of satisfaction/dissatisfaction with subordinates. Communication Quarterly, 37, 81-90.
14.
Infante, D. A. , & Rancer, A. S. (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 72-80.
15.
Infante, D. A. , & Wigley, C. J. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53, 61-69.
16.
Jablin, F. (1979). Superior-subordinate communication: The state of the art. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1201-1222.
17.
Kipnis, D. , Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-457.
18.
Lamude, K. G. , Daniels, T. D., & White, K. D. (1987). Managing the boss: Locus of control and subordinates' selection of compliance-gaining strategies in upward communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 232-259.
19.
Lamude, K. G. , & Lichtenstein, A. (1985). The effects of motivational needs and rights situational dimension on compliance-gaining strategies. Communication Research Reports, 2, 164-171.
20.
Marwell, G. , & Schmitt, D. (1967). Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, 30, 350-364.
21.
Miller, G. , Boster, F., Roloff, M., & Seibold, D. (1977). Compliance-gaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44, 37-51.
22.
Montgomery, B. M. , & Norton, R. W. (1981). Sex differences and similarities in communicator style. Communication Monographs, 48, 121-132.
23.
Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. New York: Avon.
24.
Regan, D. T. (1978). Attributional aspects of interpersonal attraction. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 207-233). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Ricillo, S. C. , & Trenholm, S. (1983). Predicting managers' choice of influence mode: The effects of interpersonal trust and worker attributions on managerial tactics in a simulated organizational setting. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 323-339.
26.
Smith, P. R. , Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, D. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
27.
Wheeless, L. R. , Wheeless, V. E., & Howard, R. D. (1984). The relationships of communication with supervisor and decision-participation to employee job satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, 32, 222-232.
28.
Wiseman, R. R. , & Schenck-Hamlin, W. (1981). A multidimensional scaling validation of an inductively-derived set of compliance-gaining strategies. Communication Monographs, 48, 251-270.
