Allen, N. , Atkinson, D., Morgan, M., Moore, T., & Snow, C. (1987). Shared document collaboration: A definition and description. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1(2), 70-90.
2.
Anderson, W. , & Kleine, M. (1988). Excellent writing: Educating the whole corporation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2,(1), 49-62.
3.
Bereiter, C. , & Scardamalia, M. (1983). Levels of inquiry in writing research. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 3-25). New York: Longman.
4.
Bogert, J. (1989). Improving the quality of writing in the workplace: A case study. Management Communication Quarterly, 2, 328-356.
5.
Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Calhoun, D. (1973). The intelligence of a people. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Curti, M. (1959). The social ideas of American educators. Paterson, NJ: Adams. (Original work published 1935).
8.
Doheny-Farina, S. (1986). Writing in an emerging organization: An ethnographic study. Written Communication, 3, 158-185.
9.
Duffy, T. , & Waller, R. (Eds.). (1985). Designing usable texts. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10.
Faigley, L. (1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 231-248). New York: Guilford.
11.
Felsenfeld, C. , & Siegel, A. (1980). Writing contracts in plain English. St. Paul, MN: West.
12.
Flower, L. , Hayes, J., & Swarts, H. (1980). Revising functional documents: The scenario principle (Technical Report No. 10, Document Design Project, National Institute of Education, 400-78-0043). Pittsburgh, PA: Communication Design Center, Carnegie Mellon University.
13.
Garfinkle, N. (1954). Conservatism in American textbooks, 1800-1860. New York History, 35, 49-63.
14.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15.
Hagge, J. , & Kostelnick, C. (1989). Linguistic politeness in professional prose: Discourse analysis of an auditor's suggestion letters, with implications for business communication pedagogy. Written Communication, 6, 312-339.
16.
Halpern, J. (1988). Getting in deep: Using qualitative research in business and technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2(2), 22-43.
17.
Harrison, T. (1987). Frameworks for the study of writing in organizational contexts. Written Communication, 4(1), 3-24.
18.
Harrison, T. , & Debs, M. (1988). Conceptualizing the role of technical communicators: A systems approach. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2(2), 5-22.
19.
Heath, S. (1980). The functions and uses of literacy. Journal of Communication, 30, 123-133.
20.
Kane, R. , Byrne, M., & Hater, M. (1974). Helping children read mathematics. New York: American Book.
21.
Kern, R. (1985). Modeling users and their use of technical manuals. In T. Duffy & R. Waller (Eds.), Designing usable texts. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
22.
Kirsch, I. , & Guthrie, J. (1977-1978). The concept and measurement of functional literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 485-507.
23.
Langer, J. , & Applebee, A. (1986). Reading and writing instruction: Toward a theory of teaching and learning. In E. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 13, pp. 171-194). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
24.
Lipson, C. (1988). A social view of technical writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2(1), 7-20.
25.
Odell, L. (1985). Beyond the text: Relations between writing and social context. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 249-280). New York: Guilford.
26.
Odell, L. , & Goswami, D. (Eds.). (1985). Writing in nonacademic settings. New York: Guilford.
27.
Odell, L. , Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in non-academic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 220-236). New York: Longman.
28.
O'Donnell, A. , Dansereau, D., Rocklin, T., Lambiotte, J., Hythecker, V., & Larsen, C. (1985). Cooperative writing: Direct effects and transfer. Written Communication, 2(3), 307-316.
29.
Paradis, J. , Dobrin, D., & Miller, R. (1985). Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the writing environment of an R & D organization. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 281-307). New York: Guilford.
30.
Piche, G. (1977). Class and culture in the development of the high school English curriculum, 1880-1900. Research in the Teaching of English, 11, 17-27.
31.
Prietula, M. , & Feltovich, P. (1988). Expertise as task adaptation. Paper submitted to the Eighth Annual International Conference on Information Systems, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
32.
Resnick, D. , & Resnick, L. (1977). The nature of literacy: An historical exploration. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 370-385.
33.
Rosen, C. , & Rosen, H. (1975). The language of primary school children. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin.
34.
Rubin, D. (1984). Social cognition and written communication. Written Communication, 1(2), 211-245.
35.
Schriver, K. (1989a). Teaching writers to anticipate readers' needs: A classroom evaluated pedagogy (Technical report, Center for the Study of Writing). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
36.
Schriver, K. (1989b). Plain language for expert or lay audiences: Designing text using protocol-aided revision (Technical report, Center for the Study of Writing). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
37.
Smagorinsky, P. (1989). The reliability and validity of protocol analysis. Written Communication, 6, 463-479.
38.
Sticht, T. (1985). Understanding readers and their uses of texts. In T. Duffy, & R. Waller (Eds.), Designing usable texts. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
39.
Stratman, J. (1988). The rhetorical dynamics of appellate court persuasion: An exploratory comparison of advocates' brief composing process with court clerks' brief reading and review process. Published doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Rhetoric Program, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
40.
Stratman, J. (in press). Teaching lawyers to revise legal documents: A role for reader protocols. Legal Writing.
41.
Stratman, J. (n.d.). Making policy work: Adapting sexual harassment rules for diverse audiences and situations. Research in progress at Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
42.
Suchan, J. , & Colucci, R. (1989). An analysis of communication efficiency between high-impact and bureaucratic written communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 2, 454-484.
43.
Thibadeau, R. , Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1982). A model of the time course and content of reading. Cognitive Science, 6, 157-203.
44.
Venezky, R. (1982). The origins of the present-day chasm between adult literacy needs and school literacy instruction. Visible Language, 16, 113-127.
45.
Venezky, R. (1984). The history of reading research. In P. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
46.
Venezky, R. (1986). Toward a history of reading instruction. In E. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 13, pp. 129-167). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
47.
Witte, S. , & Cherry, R. (1986). Writing processes and written products in composition research. In C. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (Eds.), Studying writing: Linguistic approaches (pp. 112-153). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
Young, R. (1989). Cognitive processes in argumentation: An exploratory study of management consulting expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Rhetoric Program, Pittsburgh, PA.
