Efficient written communications have become increasingly important to public and private sector managers faced with reading an ever-increasing number of documents. This study asseses the communication efficiency associated with two writing styles: a high-impact style and the traditional bureaucratic style still favored by many managers. A total of 262 naval officers stationed at the Pentagon and abroad ships in the San Diego area participated in this study. The results show that the high-impact style takes 17%-23% less time to read than the bureaucratic style, produces better message comprehension, and is less likely to need rereading.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M. J. (1980). Failures to comprehend and levels of processing in reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Anderson, R. C. , & Shifrin, Z. (1980). The meaning of words in context. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Battison R. , & Goswami, D. (1981). Clear writing today. Journal of Business Communication, 18, 5-16.
4.
Battison, R. , & Landesman, J. (1981). The cost effectiveness of designing simpler documents. Simply Stated, 16, 1-3.
5.
Bennett, J. , & Olney, R. (1986). Executive priorities for effective communication in an information society. Journal of Business Communication, 23, 13-22.
6.
Bernhardt, S. A. (1986). Seeing the text. College Composition and Communication, 37, 66-78.
7.
Bever, T. G. (1972). Perception in thought and language. In J. Carroll & R. D. Freedle (Eds.), Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Bransford, J. D. , & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
9.
Bransford, J. D. , & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Consideration of some problems of comprehension. In W. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press.
10.
Bruffee, K. R. (1986). Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographic essay. College English, 48, 773-790.
11.
Case, L. , & Needles, M. (1979). How to make real estate documents readable. Real Estate Law Journal, 7, 320-332.
12.
Charrow, V. , & Charrow, R. (1979). Making legal language understandable: Psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review, 79, 1306-1374.
13.
Clark, H. , & Clark, E. (1968). Semantic distinctions and memory for complex sentences. Quarterly Journal of Psychology, 20, 129-138.
14.
Coutis, J. K. (1987). Fry, smog, lix and rix: Insinuations about corporate business communications. Journal of Business Communication, 24, 19-27.
15.
Danks, J. , & Sorce, P. (1973). Imagery and deep structure in the prompted recall of passive sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 114-117.
16.
Davison, A. , & Kantor, R. (1982). On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 187-208.
17.
Duffy, T. M. , Curran, T. E., & Sass, D. (1983). Document design for technical job tasks: An evaluation. Human Factors, 25, 143-160.
18.
Fielden, J. S. , & Dulek, R. (1984). Bottom line business writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Frase, L. T. (1981). Writing, text, and reader. In J. Dominicet al. (Eds.), Writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Frase, L. T. , & Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Typographical cues that facilitate comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 197-206.
21.
Freed, R. , & Broadhead, G. (1987). Discourse communities, sacred texts, and institutional norms. College Composition and Communication, 38, 154-165.
22.
Hartley, J. (1980). Spatial cues in text. Visible Language, 14, 62-79.
23.
Hartley, J. , & Trueman, M. (1985). A research strategy for text designers: The role of headings. Instructional Science, 14, 99-155.
24.
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1977). The philosophy of composition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. , & Harrington, D. (1981). Measuring the communicative effectiveness of prose. In J. Dominicet al. (Eds.), Writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Irwin, J. W. , & Davis, C. R. (1980). Assessing readability: The checklist approach. Journal of Reading, 24, 124-130.
27.
Itkin, D. (1980). Know the principles of simplified contracts. Executive, 20, 25-26.
28.
Karlinsky, S. , & Koch, B. (1983). Readability is in the mind of the reader. Journal of Business Communication, 20(4), 57-69.
29.
Kieras, D. E. (1978). Good and bad structure in simple paragraphs: Effects on apparent theme, reading time, and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 13-28.
30.
Kieras, D. E. (1981). Topicalization effects in cued recall of technical prose. Memory and Cognition, 9, 541-549.
31.
Klare, G. R. (1976). A second look at the validity of readability formulas. Journal of Reading Behavior, 8, 129-152.
32.
Kostelnick, C. (1988). A systematic approach to visual language in business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 25, 29-48.
33.
McConnel, C. R. (1982). Readability formulas as applied to college economics textbooks. Journal of Reading, 26, 14-17.
34.
Mendelson, M. (1987). Business prose and the nature of the plain style. Journal of Business Communication, 24(2), 3-18.
35.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical never seven, plus or minus two. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
36.
Miller, G. A. (1970). The psychology of communication. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
37.
Moran, M. , & Moran M. (1985). Business letters, memoranda, and resumes. In M. Moran & D. Journet (Eds.), Research in technical communication: A bibliographic sourcebook. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
38.
Olson, D. R. , & Filby, N. (1972). On the comprehension of active and passive sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 361-381.
39.
Pressman, R. (1979). Legislative and regulatory progress on the readability of insurance policies. Washington, DC: Document Design Center.
40.
Redish, J. (1980). Readability. In D. B. Felker (Ed.), Document design: A review of the relevant literature. Washington, DC: Document Design Center.
41.
Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.
42.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 192-233.
43.
Seltzer, J. (1981). Readability is a four-letter word. Journal of Business Communication, 18(4), 23-34.
44.
Suchan, J. (1985). Four major management communication texts: How well do they teach readability. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 10, 161-165.
45.
Suchan, J. , & Colucci, R. (1987). Attributes public sector professionals ascribe to writers of high impact and bureaucratic communications. Paper presented at the meeting for the Association for Business Communication, Atlanta.
