Abstract
The ROCI-II, as one of the more recently developed instruments, is distinguished by its emphasis on individual predispositions, its belief in maintaining a balance in the amount of conflict in the organization, and its concern for effectiveness in managing conflicts. The scale treats communication implicitly as a set of strategies used to achieve interpersonal goals and as a way of equalizing the amount of conflict in the system. This article commends the internal reliabilities of the scale but questions the factor structure of the items. It calls for research on the predictive validity of the instrument and on the way to determine the appropriateness of a style in a particular situation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
