Abstract
The instrument that is most widely used in both research and training is the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Management-of-Differences (MODE) scale. This article highlights the MODE's uniqueness in assessing conflict intent rather than styles and of using pairs of forced-choice items to operationalize the five modes. The author calls for research aimed at improving the internal reliabilities of the items, for the use of statistics adapted to forced-choice item reponses, for factor analysis of the scale, and for tests of the ability of the instrument to predict communicative strategies in conflict situations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
