Corporate accountability remains a significant construct in normative business management theory, yet it remains ambiguous in practice. This research operationalizes a three-factor perceived corporate accountability scale from the consumers’ perspective based on the extant literature then validates this scale among three consumer samples. Perceived corporate accountability consists of three factors: proactive expectancy, reactive expectancy, and accountability enforcement. Implications for both theory and practice are discussed.
AmaoO.AmaeshiK. (2008). Galvanizing shareholder activism: A prerequisite for effective corporate governance and accountability in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9566-2
2.
ArndtA. D.FordJ. B.BabinB. J.LuongV. (2022). Collecting samples from online services: How to use screeners to improve data quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.05.001
3.
BendellJ. (2005). In whose name? The accountability of corporate social responsibility. Development in Practice, 15(3/4), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520500075813
4.
BivinsT. H. (2006). Responsibility and accountability. In FitzpatrickK.BronsteinC. (Eds.), Ethics in public relations: Responsible advocacy (pp. 19–38). Sage.
5.
BovensM. (2005). Public accountability. In FerlieE.FlynnL. E.JrPollittC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
6.
BrandsmaG. J. (2014). Quantitative analysis. In BovensM.GoodinR. E.SchillemansT. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 143–158). Oxford University Press.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
9.
CarpenterS. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
10.
CiszekE. L. (2015). Bridging the gap: Mapping the relationship between activism and public relations. Public Relations Review, 41(4), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.05.016
11.
CoombsT.HolladayS. (2015). CSR as crisis risk: Expanding how we conceptualize the relationship. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-10-2013-0078
12.
DavenportK. (2000). Corporate citizenship: A stakeholder approach for defining corporate social performance and identifying measures for assessing it. Business & Society, 39(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900205
13.
DeVellisR. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage.
14.
DooreyD. J. (2011). The transparent supply chain: From resistance to implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0882-1
15.
DubnickM. J. (2003). Accountability and ethics: Reconsidering the relationships. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 6(3), 405–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijotb-06-03-2003-b002
El AbboubiM.PinningtonA. H.CleggS. R.NicolopoulouK. (2021). Involving, countering, and overlooking stakeholder networks in soft regulation: Case study of small-to-medium-sized enterprise’s implementation of SA8000. Business & Society, 61(6), 1594–1630. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211017508
19.
FinerH. (1940). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/972907
20.
FreidrichC. J. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In FriedrichC. J.MasonE. (Eds.), Public policy: A yearbook of the graduate school of public administration (Vol. 1, pp. 3–24). Harvard University Press.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
23.
HonL.GrunigJ. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. The Institute for Public Relations.
24.
HoodC. (2014). Accountability and blame-avoidance. In BovensM.GoodinR. E.SchillemansT. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 603–616). Oxford University Press.
25.
HosmerL. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9507312923
JacksonM. (2009). Responsibility versus accountability in the Friedrich-Finer debate. Journal of Management History, 15(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511340910921790
KearnsK. P. (1996). Managing for accountability. Jossey-Bass.
30.
KimH. K.NiederdeppeJ. (2013). The role of emotional response during an H1N1 influenza pandemic on a college campus. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2013.739100
31.
KingB. G. (2008). A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.3.395
32.
KingB. G. (2011). The tactical disruptiveness of social movements: Sources of market and mediated disruption in corporate boycotts. Social Problems, 58(4), 491–517. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2011.58.4.491
33.
KleinJ. G.SmithN. C.JohnA. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.3.92.34770
34.
LammeM. O.RussellK. M. (2009). Removing the spin: Toward a new theory of public relations history. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 11(4), 280–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/152263791001100402
35.
LandrumN. E.DailyC. M. (2012). Corporate accountability: A path-goal perspective. Journal of Business Insights and Transformation, 4(3), 50–62.
McDonnellM. H.KingB. (2013). Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3), 387–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213500032
OlsenJ. P. (2014). Accountability and ambiguity. In BovensM.GoodinR. E.SchillemansT. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 106–124). Oxford University Press.
41.
PaiD.LaiC.ChuiC.YangC. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and brand advocacy in business-to-business market: The mediated moderating effect of attribution. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 685–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1979-5
42.
PetersG. F.RomiA. M. (2013). Discretionary compliance with mandatory environmental disclosures: Evidence from SEC filings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(4), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.04.004
43.
RascheA.EsserD. E. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability: Applying Habermasian discourse ethics to accountability research. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y
44.
RawlinsB. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802153421
SchedlerA. (1999). Conceptualizing accountability. In SchedlerA.DiamondL. J.PlattnerM. F. (Eds.), The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in the new democracies (pp. 13–28). Lynne Rienner.
47.
SeidmanG. (2005). The origins of accountability: Everything i know about the sovereign’s immunity i learned from King Henry III. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 49(2), 393–480. https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol49/iss2/6.
48.
SeidmanG. (2008a). Beyond the boycott: Labor rights: Human rights, and transnational activism. Russell Sage Foundation.
49.
SeidmanG. (2008b). Transnational labour campaigns: Can the logic of the market be turned against itself?Development and Change, 39(6), 991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00525.x
50.
StenningP. C. (1995). Accountability for criminal justice. University of Toronto Press.
51.
SwiftT. (2001). Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 10(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00208
52.
TetlockP. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.74
ValorC. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business and Society Review, 110(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0045-3609.2005.00011.x
56.
VenetteS. J.SellnowT. L.LangP. A. (2003). Metanarration’s role in restructuring perceptions of crisis: NHTSA’s failure in the ford-firestone crisis. International Journal of Business Communication, 40(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194360304000303
57.
WaddockS. (2004). Creating corporate accountability: Foundational principles to make corporate citizenship real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:busi.0000025080.77652.a3
58.
ZeithamlV. A.BerryL. L.ParasuramanA. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251929
