Religious communities have long affirmed the agency of their sacred texts and their God/gods, providing a unique site of study for research on ventriloquizing authority, textual agency, and the power of incorporeal figures like values or principles. This paper uses PraiseMoves, an Evangelical organization selling a “Christian alternative to yoga,” as a case study to develop the concept of deific agency. Deific agency is the agential power of incorporeal projections of moral authority. These projections mediate text-human relationships both in and beyond particular organizational contexts by imbuing visibly-privileged human bodies with moral authority. Deific figures can thus overwhelm textual agency by bonding with visibly-privileged bodies and thereafter organizing perceptions of moral authority in and beyond organizations in ways that disproportionately benefit physically-privileged human beings. This paper concludes by articulating the value of believing bodies for research and suggesting future avenues of inquiry.
AshcraftK. L. (2007). Appreciating the ‘work’ of discourse: Occupational identity and difference as organizing mechanisms in the case of commercial airline pilots. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071982
2.
AshcraftK. L. (2013). The glass slipper: “Incorporating” occupational identity in management studies. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 6–31.
3.
AshcraftK. L.KuhnT. R.CoorenF. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903047186
4.
BarkerJ. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393374
5.
BebbingtonD. W. (2004). Evangelicalism in modern Britain: A history from the 1730s to the 1980s. Taylor & Francis.
6.
Benoit-BarnéC.CoorenF. (2009). The accomplishment of authority through presentification: How authority is distributed among and negotiated by organizational members. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335414
BrummansB. H. J. M. (2011). What goes down must come up: Communication as incarnation and transcension. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8(2), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2011.567810
9.
BrummansB. H. J. M. (Ed.). (2018). The agency of organizing: Perspectives and case studies. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
10.
BrummansB. H. J. M.HighamL.CoorenF. (2022). The work of conflict mediation: Actors, vectors, and communicative relationality. Human Relations, 75(4), 764–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726721994180
11.
BrummansB. H. J. M.HwangJ. M.CheongP. H. (2013). Mindful authoring through invocation: Leaders’ constitution of a spiritual organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(3), 346–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913479176
12.
BrummansB. H. J. M.HwangJ. M.CheongP. H. (2020). Recycling stories: Mantras, communication, and organizational materialization. Organization Studies, 41(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618819033
13.
ButlerA. (2021). White Evangelical racism: The politics of morality in America. UNC Press Books.
Charoensap-KellyP.MestayerC. L.KnightG. B. (2020). To come out or not to come out: Minority religious identity self-disclosure in the United States workplace. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(2), 213–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318919890072
16.
ChoryR. M.HoranS. M.RaposoP. J. C. (2019). Superior–subordinate aggressive communication among Catholic priests and sisters in the United States. Management Communication Quarterly, 089331891987993. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318919879935
17.
ClairR. P.AndersonL. B. (2013). Portrayals of the poor on the cusp of capitalism: Promotional materials in the case of Heifer International. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(4), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913502773
18.
CliftonJ.FachinF.CoorenF. (2021). How artefacts do leadership: A ventriloquial analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318921998078
CoorenF. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x
21.
DouglasM. (2013). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
22.
DruryJ. P. M. (2018). Beyond “rhetorical agency”: Skutnik’s story in the 1982 state of the union address. Western Journal of Communication, 82(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1294705
23.
Du MezK. K. (2020). Jesus and John Wayne: How white Evangelicals corrupted a faith and fractured a nation. Liveright Publishing.
24.
GillR.WellsC. C. (2014). Welcome to the “Hunger Games”: An exploration of the rhetorical construction of legitimacy for one U.S.-based nonprofit organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913513434
25.
HardingS. F. (2000). The book of Jerry Falwell: Fundamentalist language and politics. Princeton University Press.
hooksbell. (1992). Eating the other: Desire and reistance. In Black looks: Race and representation (pp. 21–39). South End Press.
28.
JahnJ. L. S. (2016). Adapting safety rules in a high reliability context: How wildland firefighting workgroups ventriloquize safety rules to understand hazards. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(3), 362–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915623638
29.
JahnJ. L. S. (2018). Genre as textual agency: Using communicative relationality to theorize the agential-performative relationship between human and generic text. Communication Monographs, 85(4), 515–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1481986
30.
JohnsonJ. (2018). Biblical porn: Affect, labor, and Pastor Mark Driscoll’s evangelical empire. Duke University Press.
31.
King WattsE.OrbeM. (2002). The spectacular consumption of “true” African American culture: “Whassup” with the Budweiser guys?Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180216554
32.
KoschmannM. A.McDonaldJ. (2015). Organizational rituals, communication, and the question of agency. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(2), 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915572386
33.
LeeS.SinitiereP. L. (2009). Holy mavericks: Evangelical innovators and the spiritual marketplace. NYU Press.
34.
McGuireT. (2010). From emotions to spirituality: “Spiritual labor” as the commodification, codification, and regulation of organizational members’ spirituality. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 74–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909351432
35.
MoretonB. (2009). To serve God and Wal-Mart: The making of Christian free enterprise. Harvard University Press.
36.
NadesanM. H. (1999). The discourses of corporate spiritualism and Evangelical capitalism. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318999131001
37.
OliverJ. E.WoodT. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
38.
PoppR. K. (2010). Visual culture, public space, and piety in focus on the family’s Citizen Magazine. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 27(5), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030903583622
RennstamJ.AshcraftK. L. (2014). Knowing work: Cultivating a practice-based epistemology of knowledge in organization studies. Human Relations, 67(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713484182
41.
RussoM. J. (1995). The female grotesque: Risk, excess, and modernity. Psychology Press.
42.
SchnabelE. (2022). White secularity: The racialization of religion in Netflix’s Unorthodox. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 39(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2022.2056217
43.
SchnabelE.SilvaK. (2019). The good name of Roy Moore: WASPMs and the communities who vote for them. In Gender, race, and social identity in American politics (pp. 255–271). Lexington Books.
44.
SilvaK. (2016). Brown threat: Identification in the security state. University of Minnesota Press.
45.
SmithC.EmersonM.GallagherS.KennedyP.SikkinkD. (1998). American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving (1st ed). University of Chicago Press.
46.
SmithL. D. (2020). Compromising positions: Sex scandals, politics, and American Christianity. Oxford University Press.
47.
SorsaV.PälliP.MikkolaP. (2014). Appropriating the words of strategy in performance appraisal interviews. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913513270
48.
StielstraG.HutchinsB. (Eds.). (2015). Meet the real Christian Consumer: They are no different. They are so different. In Faith-based marketing (pp. 25–37). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119198550.ch3
49.
SullivanK. R.DelaneyH. (2017). A femininity that ‘giveth and taketh away’: The prosperity gospel and postfeminism in the neoliberal economy. Human Relations, 70(7), 836–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716676322
50.
TraceyP. (2012). Religion and organization: A critical review of current trends and future directions. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 87–134. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.660761
51.
TracyS. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
52.
VásquezC.CoorenF. (2013). Spacing practices: The communicative configuration of organizing through space-times: Spacing practices. Communication Theory, 23(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12003
53.
WardM.Sr. (2018). “Head knowledge isn’t enough:" Bible visualization and congregational culture in an Evangelical church. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 14, 1–33.
54.
WengerT. J. (2017). Religious freedom: The contested history of an American ideal. University of North Carolina Press.
55.
WielandS. M. B. (2010). Ideal selves as resources for the situated practice of identity. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318910374938
56.
WinslowL. A. (2014). The imaged other: Style and substance in the rhetoric of Joel Osteen. Southern Communication Journal, 79(3), 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2013.872173
