Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-2
Key Players in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Institutionalization: An Analysis of Multinational Companies’ Interorganizational Positioning via CSR Reports
Drawing on institutional theory, we position CSR reports as a crucial communication practice that provides evidence of shared norms, values, and relationships among organizations operating within the institutionalized environment. Through Fortune Global 500 companies’ CSR reports published in 2018 and using named entity recognition, we analyzed interorganizational networks to understand the driving forces behind CSR institutionalization. After fitting exponential random graph models (ERGMs) to the network, we found that standards-setting organizations played the most prominent role. In addition, we identified distinct sectoral preferences in companies’ interorganizational positioning in relation to legitimacy-granting organizations such as (inter)governmental agencies and financial organizations. We discuss the implications of the emphasis on standardization, sectoral differences, and network dynamics among various legitimacy-granting organizations on CSR institutionalization and CSR reporting as communicative constitution of institutional legitimacy.
AllenM. W.CraigC. A. (2016). Rethinking corporate social responsibility in the age of climate change: A communication perspective. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0002-8
2.
AryaB.ZhangG. (2009). Institutional reforms and investor reactions to CSR announcements: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Management Studies, 46(7), 1089–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00836.x
3.
AvetisyanE.FerraryM. (2013). Dynamics of stakeholders’ implications in the institutionalization of the CSR field in France and in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1386-3
4.
BallouB.ChenP. C.GrenierJ. H.HeitgerD. L. (2018). Corporate social responsibility assurance and reporting quality: Evidence from restatements. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.02.001
5.
BatorM. J.StohlC. (2011). New partnerships for a new generation of corporate social responsibility. In IhlenØ.BartlettJ. L.MayS. (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 399–422). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118083246.ch20
6.
CampbellJ. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
7.
ChenL.SrinidhiB.TsangA.YuW. (2016). Audited financial reporting and voluntary disclosure of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51411
DacinM. T. (1997). Isomorphism in context: The power and prescription of institutional norms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 46–81. https://doi.org/10.5465/257020
10.
DelmasM. A.Montes-SanchoM. J. (2011). An institutional perspective on the diffusion of international management system standards: The case of the environmental management standard ISO 14001. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20112115
11.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
12.
DowlingJ.PfefferJ. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
13.
EpsteinM. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge.
14.
FinkelJ. R.GrenagerT.ManningC. D. (2005, June). Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 363–370).
15.
FlammerC. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0744
Garcia‐ToreaN.Fernandez‐FeijooB.De La CuestaM. (2020). CSR reporting communication: Defective reporting models or misapplication?Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 952–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1858
18.
González‐BenitoJ.González‐BenitoÓ. (2010). A study of determinant factors of stakeholder environmental pressure perceived by industrial companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.631
19.
HeathR. L. (2002). Comment: Issues management: Its past, present and future. Journal of Public Affairs, 2(4), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.114
20.
HendryJ. R. (2006). Taking aim at business: What factors lead environmental non-governmental organizations to target particular firms?Business & Society, 45(1), 47–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305281849
JoH.NaH. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1492-2
23.
JosephC.GunawanJ.SawaniY.RahmatM.NoyemJ. A.DarusF. (2016). A comparative study of anti-corruption practice disclosure among Malaysian and Indonesian corporate social responsibility (CSR) best practice companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(4), 2896–2906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.091.
24.
KangN.MoonJ. (2012). Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and CSR: A comparative institutional analysis of three capitalisms. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr025
25.
LeeT. H. (2020). Communicative institutionalization of CSR: A content analysis of firms’ motivations in social reports from three market economies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2020.1750668
26.
LiF.DingD. Z. (2013). The effect of institutional isomorphic pressure on the internationalization of firms in an emerging economy: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(4), 506–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2013.807602
27.
LiuW.ShinJ. (2019). Convergence or divergence: Exploring different mechanisms driving children’s rights organizations’ offline versus online interorganizational alliance building. Telematics and Informatics, 42, Article 101242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101242
28.
Martínez-FerreroJ.García-SánchezI. M. (2017). Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. International Business Review, 26(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.009
29.
McPheeR. D.ZaugP. (2008). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. In PutnamL. L.NicoteraA. M. (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 21-47). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891025.
30.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
31.
MichelonG.PilonatoS.RicceriF. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
32.
MilneM. J.GrayR. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8
33.
MoratisL.WidjajaA. T. (2014). Determinants of CSR standards adoption: Exploring the case of ISO 26000 and the CSR performance ladder in The Netherlands. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(3), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2013-0005
34.
O’ConnorA.GronewoldK. L. (2012). Black gold, green earth: An analysis of the petroleum industry’s CSR environmental sustainability discourse. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(2), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912465189
35.
O’ConnorA.ParchaJ. M.TulibaskiK. L. (2017). The institutionalization of corporate social responsibility communication: An intra-industry comparison of MNCs’ and SMEs’ CSR reports. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(4), 503–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917704512
36.
O’ConnorA.ShumateM. (2010). An economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909358747
37.
PolishchukL. (2009). Corporate social responsibility or government regulation: An analysis of institutional choice. Problems of Economic Transition, 52(8), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.2753/pet1061-1991520805
38.
RenneboogL.Ter HorstJ.ZhangC. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.039.
39.
RobinsG.SnijdersT.WangP.HandcockM.PattisonP. (2007). Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.003
RoychowdhuryS.ShroffN.VerdiR. S. (2019). The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 68(2-3), Article 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2019.101246
SchererA. G.PalazzoG. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x
44.
SchererA. G.SmidM. (2000). The downward spiral and the US model business principles-why MNEs should take responsibility for the improvement of world-wide social and environmental conditions. MIR: Management International Review, 40(4), 351–371.
45.
ScottW. R. (2004). Institutional theory. In RitzerG. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 408–414). Sage.
46.
ShabanaK. M.BuchholtzA. K.CarrollA. B. (2017). The institutionalization of corporate social responsibility reporting. Business & Society, 56(8), 1107–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316628177.
47.
ShumateM.O'ConnorA. (2010a). Corporate reporting of cross-sector alliances: The portfolio of NGO partners communicated on corporate websites. Communication Monographs, 77(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758201.
48.
ShumateM.O'ConnorA. (2010b). The symbiotic sustainability model: Conceptualizing NGO–corporate alliance communication. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 577–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01498.x.
49.
SnijdersT. A.PattisonP. E.RobinsG. L.HandcockM. S. (2006). New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36(1), 99–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2006.00176.x
50.
SommerfeldtE. J.XuS. (2017). Making a “difference” with digital media? The evaluation perspectives, practices, and challenges of Chinese NGOs. Chinese Journal of Communication, 10(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1210184
51.
StohlC.EtterM.BanghartS.WooD. (2017). Social media policies: Implications for contemporary notions of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2743-9
52.
TagessonT.BlankV.BrobergP.CollinS. O. (2009). What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: A study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(6), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.194.
53.
TschoppD.HuefnerR. J. (2015). Comparing the evolution of CSR reporting to that of financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2054-6
UttingP.MarquesJ. C. (2010). Introduction: The intellectual crisis of CSR. In UttingP.MarquesJ. C. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and regulatory governance (pp. 1–25). Palgrave Macmillan.
56.
WaddockS. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2008.34587997
57.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
YangA. (2020). The issue niche theory of nongovernmental and nonprofit organizations’ interorganizational network ecology. Communication Theory, 30(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz014.
60.
YangA.SafferA. J. (2019). Embracing a network perspective in the network society: The dawn of a new paradigm in strategic public relations. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101843
61.
YoungS.MaraisM. (2012). A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: The implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00926.x
62.
YuX. (2009). From passive beneficiary to active stakeholder: Workers’ participation in CSR movement against labor abuses. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9815-z
