Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article explores how contradictory sources of authority manifest the organizational presence of a crisis pregnancy center (CPC) in the southeastern region of the United States. As a type of shadowed organization, a CPC’s organizational presence is produced in a tensional space between dialectics of revelation and concealment. With an interest toward understanding these dynamics, we conduct a ventriloquial analysis of CPC’s pamphlets and website to examine how sources of authority produce the CPC as a distinct organization. Through this analysis, we develop the idea of authorial incongruity—the co-presence of multiple and heterogeneous sources of authority—to demonstrate how organizational presence emerges as a byproduct of tensional relations between authorities, which serve as resources for organizations seeking to present themselves as consistently “who they have always been.” The implications of these findings suggest distinct challenges and opportunities for building strategic relations between (shadowed) organizations and various incongruent stakeholder groups.

Keywords

organizational presence authority ventriloquism hidden organizations relational ontology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

(2015). Informed decision making and abortion: Crisis pregnancy centers, informed consent, and the first amendment. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 43(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12195

Ashcraft

K. L.

(2001). Organized dissonance: Feminist bureaucracy as hybrid form. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1301–1322. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069402

Bencherki

Bourgoin

Chen

Cooren

Denault

Plusquellec

(2020). Bodies, faces, physical spaces and the materializations of authorityN. Bencherki, F. In Matte Cooren

(Eds.), Authority and power in social interaction: Methods and analysis (pp. 77–98). Routledge.

Benoit-Barné

Cooren

(2009). The accomplishment of authority through presentification: How authority is distributed among and negotiated by organizational members. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335414

Benoit-Barné

Fox

(2017). Authority. In Scott

C. R.

Lewis

L. K.

(Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 1–13). Wiley-Blackwell.

Bisel

R. S.

(2009). On a growing dualism in organizational discourse research. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(4), 614–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318908331100

Bok

(1989). Secrets: On the ethics of concealment and revelation. Vintage.

Borrero

Frietsche

Dehlendorf

(2019). Crisis pregnancy centers: Faith centers operating in bad faith. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(1), 144–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4703-4

Bourgoin

Bencherki

Faraj

(2020). “And who are you?”: A performative perspective on authority in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4), 1134–1165. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1335

10.

Brummans

B. H. J. M.

Cooren

Chaput

(2009). Discourse, communication, and organisational ontology. In Bargiela-Chiappini

(Ed.), The handbook of business discourse (pp. 53–65). Edinburgh University Press.

11.

Bryant

A. G.

Levi

E. E.

(2012). Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina. Contraception, 86(6), 752–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.001

12.

Bryant

A. G.

Narasimhan

Bryant-Comstock

Levi

E. E.

(2014). Crisis pregnancy center websites: Information, misinformation and disinformation. Contraception, 90(6), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.003

13.

Chen

A. X.

(2013). Crisis pregnancy centers: Impeding the right to informed decision making. Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender, 19, 933-960.

14.

Christensen

L. T.

Cornelissen

(2015). Organizational transparency as myth and metaphor. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014555256

15.

Coleman

P. K.

(2011). Abortion and mental health: Quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995–2009. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(3), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.077230

16.

Cooren

(2008). Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.018

17.

Cooren

(2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x

18.

Cooren

(2015). Studying agency from a ventriloquial perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(3), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915584825

19.

Cooren

(2018). Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx014

20.

Cooren

Bencherki

(2010). How things do things with words: Ventriloquism, passion and technology. Encyclopaideia, 14(28), 35–62.

21.

Cooren

Brummans

B. H. J. M.

Charrieras

(2008). The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Medecins Sans Frontieres in action. Human Relations, 61(10), 1339–1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708095707

22.

Cooren

Matte

Benoit-Barné

Brummans

B. H. J. M.

(2013). Communication as ventriloquism: A grounded-in-action approach to the study of organizational tensions. Communication Monographs, 80(3), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.788255.

23.

Coyne

(2018, December 21). Yes, there is a war between science and religion. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/yes-there-is-a-war-between-science-and- religion-108002

24.

Daling

J. R.

Malone

K. E.

Voigt

L. F.

White

Weiss

N. S.

(1994). Risk of breast cancer among young women: Relationship to induced abortion. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 86(21), 1584–1592. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/86.21.1584

25.

de Souza

(2019). Feeding the other: Whiteness, privilege, and neoliberal stigma in food pantries. MIT Press.

26.

Fairhurst

G. T.

Putnam

(2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00301.x

27.

Gioia

D. A.

Schultz

Corley

K. G.

(2000). Organizational identity, image and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791603

28.

Hussey

L. S.

(2013). Crisis pregnancy centers, poverty, and the expanding frontiers of American abortion politics. Politics & Policy, 41(6), 985–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12054

29.

Kelly

(2014). Evangelical underdogs: Intrinsic success, organizational solidarity and marginalized identities as religious movement resources. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(4), 419–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613516627

30.

Kimport

Dockray

J. P.

Dodson

(2016). What women seek from a pregnancy resource center. Contraception, 94(2), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.04.003

31.

Kuhn

Ashcraft

K. L.

Cooren

(2017). The work of communication: Relational perspectives on working and organizing in contemporary capitalism. Routledge.

32.

McVeigh

Crubaugh

Estep

(2017). Plausibility structures, status threats, and the establishment of anti-abortion centers. American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1533–1571. https://doi.org/10.1086/691127

33.

Paul

Strbiak

C. A.

(1997). The ethics of strategic ambiguity. The Journal of Business Communication, 34(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369703400202

34.

Putnam

L. L.

(2019). Constituting order and disorder: Embracing tensions and contradictions. In Vásquez

Kuhn

(Eds.), Dis/organization as communication: Exploring the disordering, disruptive, and chaotic properties of communication (pp. 17–35). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492327-2

35.

Putnam

L. L.

Pacanowsky

M. E.

(1983). Communication and organizations: An interpretive perspective. SAGE.

36.

Rosen

J. D.

(2012). The public health risks of crisis pregnancy centers. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44(3), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1363/4420112

37.

Scott

C. R

(2013). Anonymous agencies, backstreet business, and covert collectives. Stanford University Press.

38.

Steinberg

J. R.

Trussell

Hall

K. S.

Guthrie

(2012). Fatal flaws in a recent meta- analysis on abortion and mental health. Contraception, 86(5), 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.03.012

39.

Swartzendruber

Newton-Levinson

Feuchs

A. E.

Phillips

A. L.

Hickey

Steiner

R. J.

(2018). Sexual and reproductive health services and related health information on pregnancy resource center websites: A statewide content analysis. Women’s Health Issues, 28(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2017.10.007

40.

Vasilyeva

A. L.

Robles

J. S.

Saludadez

J. A.

Schwagerl

Castor

(2020). The varieties of (more or less) formal authority. In Bencherki

Matte

Cooren

(Eds.), Authority and power in social interaction: Methods and analysis (pp. 37–55). Routledge.

41.

Vásquez

Kuhn

(2019). Introduction. In Vásquez

Kuhn

(Eds.), Dis/organization as communication: Exploring the disordering, disruptive, and chaotic properties of communication (pp. 1–13). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492327-1

42.

Weick

K. E.

(1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley.

43.

Weick

K. E.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

Obstfeld

(2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133

44.

Wolfe

A. W.

Blithe

S. J.

(2015). Managing image in a core-stigmatized organization: Concealment and revelation in Nevada’s legal brothels. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(4), 539–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915596204

Authorial Incongruity and Organizational Presence(s): A Ventriloquial Analysis of Shadowed Organization

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References