Organizational communication scholars have historically conducted research in large for-profit businesses, governmental agencies, and a few high-profile nonprofits/NGOs—all of which are relatively easy to access and presumably “safe” to study. It is largely unsurprising, then, that limited scholarship addresses the challenges associated with conducting research in less standard contexts that are often perceived to be difficult, dangerous, and/or vulnerable (DDV). In this forum, we offer lived stories—unfiltered messy narratives—to demystify three core ethical challenges inherent in conducting research of this nature and share how we (imperfectly) navigated them. In addition, we offer practical strategies for conducting research in DDV contexts. Taken together, our overall collective aim is to successfully prepare future scholars to conduct research projects in DDV contexts.
AlbuO. B.CostasJ. (2018). Thrice-born and in-between? Exploring the différance between “at-home” ethnography and ethnography abroad. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 7(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-07-2018-073
2.
AlexanderM. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.
3.
AllenJ. A.ScottC. W.TracyS. J.CroweJ. D. (2014). The signal provision of emotion: Using emotions to enhance reliability via sensemaking. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 6(3), 240–260. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJWOE.2014.065758
4.
BiselR. S. (2017). Organizational moral learning: A communication approach. Routledge.
5.
BoyerE. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate (pp. 1–25). Jossey-Bass Books.
6.
EllingsonL. L.QuinlanM. M. (2012). Beyond the research/service dichotomy. Qualitative Communication Research, 1(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1525/qcr.2012.1.3.385
HochschildA. R. (1983). The managed heart. University of California Press.
9.
JensenP. R.CruzJ.EgerE.HancheyJ.Gist-MackeyA.Ruiz-MesaK.VillamilA.(2020). Pushing beyond positionalities and through “failures” into qualitative organizational communication: Experiences and lessons on identities in ethnographic praxis. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(1), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318919885654
10.
LeeR.M. (1995). Dangerous fieldwork. Qualitative Research Methods Series (34). Sage Publications.
11.
LukianoffG.HaidtJ. (2018). The codding of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Books.
12.
MeisenbachR. J. (2017). Integrating ethics and responsibility into organizational communication research. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318916676891
13.
PetersonB. L.HarterL. M.WalkerT. (Forthcoming). “Tell me more…” Six word stories as a start. In PetersonB. L.HarterL. M. (Eds), (Forthcoming). Brave space-making: The poetics and politics of storytelling. Kendall Hunt.
14.
PetersonB. L.HookC.SloatM. (Forthcoming). And all because she was/n’t believed…Composite narratives and dialogic data debriefing as disruption. In PetersonB. L.HarterL. M. (Eds), (Forthcoming). Brave space-making: The poetics and politics of storytelling. Kendall Hunt.
PlaisanceP. L. (2009). Media ethics: Key principles for responsible practice. SAGE.
17.
QiuJ. L. (2016). Goodbye iSlave: A manifesto for digital abolition. University of Illinois Press.
18.
RehaviM. M.StarrS. B. (2014). Racial disparity in federal criminal sentences. Journal of Political Economy, 122(6), 1320–1354. https://doi.org/10.1086/677255
19.
The Sentencing Project (2018). Report of the Sentencing Project to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance: Regarding Racial disparities in the United States criminal justice system. The Sentencing Project Research and Advocacy for Reform. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/un-report-on-racial-disparities/
20.
TracyS. J. (2014). Fieldwork horse-assery: Making the most of feeling humiliated, rebuffed, and offended during participant observation research. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(3), 459–466. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0893318914536965
21.
TracyS. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
22.
TracyS. J.EgerE. K.HuffmanT. P.Malvini ReddenS. M.ScarduzioJ. A. (2014). Narrating the backstage of qualitative research in organizational communication: A synthesis. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(3), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914536964
23.
TracyS. J.Lutgen-SandvikP.AlbertsJ. K. (2006). Nightmares, demons, and slaves. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(2), 148–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318906291980
24.
Van MaanenJ. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago University Press.
25.
WolfeA. W.BlitheS. J. (2015). Managing image in a core-stigmatized organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(4), 539–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915596204
26.
ZimbraD.AbbasiA.ChenH. (2010). A cyber-archaeology approach to social movement research: Framework and case study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01531.x
