Guided by feminist politics of reinscription and intersectionality theory, this study theorized how women entrepreneurs from China, Denmark, and the United States depicted their situated struggles to resist simultaneous interlocking oppressions in everyday entrepreneuring based on 40 in-depth interviews. Participants described that they experienced inscription whereby multiple power asymmetries of gender, age, culture, race/ethnicity, and so on emerged and entangled to prescribe social scripts that constrained their entrepreneurial agencies. Simultaneously, participants engaged in reinscription to deconstruct intersectional controls and rework hegemonic scripts in situated entrepreneurial activities. They deployed three resistance strategies: recontextualizing their intersectionalities in different discursive contexts to legitimize and elevate their entrepreneur identities; reformulating their intersectionalities by invoking privileged positions to counterbalance marginalization; and re-envisioning by transcending their intersectional subordination to create opportunities for change. Instead of focusing on pre-existing and fixed power structures and identities in intersectional resistance-control processes, we demonstrate how intersectionalities are (re)constituted in situ through complex and fluid inscription-reinscription dynamics in women’s entrepreneurship.
AlvessonM. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925191
4.
AlvessonM.WillmottH. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. The Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 432–464. https://doi.org/10.2307/258718
5.
AshcraftK. L. (2005). Resistance through consent? Occupational identity, organizational form, and the maintenance of masculinity among commercial airline pilots. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905276560
6.
BarraganS.ErogulM. S.EssersC. (2018). ‘Strategic (dis)obedience’: Female entrepreneurs reflecting on and acting upon patriarchal practices. Gender, Work and Organization, 25(5), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12258
7.
BourneK.CalásM. (2013). Becoming “real” entrepreneurs: Women and the gendered normalization of “work.”Gender, Work & Organization, 20(4), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00591.x
8.
BrahA.PhoenixA. (2004). Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(1), 75–86. http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol5/iss3/8
9.
BrushC.EdelmanL.ManolovaT.WelterF. (2019). A gendered look at entrepreneurship ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9992-9
10.
ChoS.CrenshawK. W.McCallL. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
CourpassonD. (2017). Beyond the hidden/public resistance divide: How bloggers defeated a big company. Organization Studies, 38(9), 1277–1302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685363
13.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
14.
CruzJ. M. (2015). Dirty work at the intersections of gender, class, and nation: Liberian market women in post-conflict times. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2015.1087439
15.
CruzJ. M.Gist-MackeyA. N.HancheyJ. N.Lockwood HarrisK.JensenP. R.KenneyS. C.LeslieK. J. (2020). #ToneUpOrgComm: A manifestx. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 9(2), 152–154. https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.2.152
16.
EssersC.BenschopY. (2007). Enterprising identities: Female entrepreneurs of Moroccan or Turkish origin in the Netherlands. Organization Studies, 28(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607068256
17.
EssersC.BenschopY. (2009). Muslim businesswomen doing boundary work: The negotiation of Islam, gender and ethnicity within entrepreneurial contexts. Human Relations, 62(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101042
GaneshS.ZollerH.CheneyG. (2005). Transforming resistance, broadening our boundaries: Critical organizational communication meets globalization from below. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111872
20.
GillR. (2013). The evolution of organizational archetypes: From the American to the entrepreneurial dream. Communication Monographs, 80(3), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.788252
21.
GillR.GaneshS. (2007). Empowerment, constraint, and the entrepreneurial self: A study of white women entrepreneurs. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(3), 268–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880701434265
HarrisK. L. (2013). Show them a good time: Organizing the intersections of sexual violence. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(4), 568–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913506519
24.
HarrisK. L. (2017). Re-situating organizational knowledge: Violence, intersectionality and the privilege of partial perspective. Human Relations, 70(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716654745
25.
HollingM. A. (2020). Intersectionalities in the fields of Chicana Feminism: Pursuing decolonization through Xicanisma’s “Resurrection of the Dreamers.” In EguchiS.CalafellB. M.AbdiS. (Eds.), De-Whitening intersectionality: Race, intercultural communication, and politics (pp. 3–24). Lexington.
26.
KnightM. (2016). Race-ing, classing and gendering racialized women’s participation in entrepreneurship. Gender, Work and Organization, 23(3), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12060
27.
KondoD. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. University of Chicago Press.
28.
KritzA.GummessonE.QuaziA. (2013). Methodology meets culture: Relational and guanxi-oriented research in China. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 14(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595813493265
29.
LeineM.MikkelsenH.SenA. (2020). “Danish women put up with less”: Gender equality and the politics of denial in Denmark. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 27(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506819887402
30.
LewisP. (2006). The quest for invisibility: Female entrepreneurs and the masculine norm of entrepreneurship. Gender, Work and Organization, 13(5), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00317.x
31.
LewisP. (2013). The search for an authentic entrepreneurial identity: Difference and professionalism among women business owners. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(3), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00568.x
32.
LiJ.SunJ.Y.WangL.KeJ. (2020). Second-generation women entrepreneurs in Chinese family-owned businesses: Motivations, challenges, and opportunities. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 22(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422320907043
33.
LinabaryJ. R.CruzJ. M.AllenB. J.ChalupaJ. A.DempseyS. E.GlennC. L.HarrisK. L.LongZ.McDonaldJ.MuslehS.OktavianiF. H.ParkerP.SolandeF. (2021). Envisioning more equitable and just futures: Feminist organizational communication in theory and praxis. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(1), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920973598
34.
LiuX.DaW.MartinG.LiuK. (2019). Regional income mobility in large cities throughout China. Applied Economics Letters, 26(16), 1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1558333
35.
LongZ. (2016). A feminist ventriloqual analysis of “Hao Gongzuo” (good work): Politicizing Chinese Post80s women’s constructions of meanings of work. Women’s Studies in Communication, 39(4), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1224991
36.
LongZ.BuzzanellP. M.KuangK. (2016). Positioning work amid discontinuities and continuities: Chinese Post80s workers’ dialogical constructions of meanings of work. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 532–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318916636237
37.
LongZ.KingA. S.BuzzanellP. M. (2018). Ventriloqual voicings of parenthood in graduate school: An intersectionality analysis of work-life negotiations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1435901
38.
McCabeD.CiukS.RussellS. (2019). Understanding and analyzing resistance to management ideas. In SturdyA.HeusinkveldS.ReayT.StrangD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of management ideas (pp. 354–373). Oxford University Press.
39.
McDonaldJ. (2015). Organizational communication meets queer theory: Theorizing relations of “difference” differently. Communication Theory, 25(3), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12060
40.
McDonaldJ.HarrisK. L.RamirezJ. (2020). Revealing and concealing difference: A critical approach to disclosure and an intersectional theory of “closeting.”Communication Theory, 30(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz017
41.
MalmströmM.JohanssonJ.WincentJ. (2017). Gender stereotypes and venture support decisions: How governmental venture capitalists socially construct entrepreneurs’ potential. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(5), 833–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12275
NeergaardH.ThraneC. (2011). The Nordic welfare model: Barrier or facilitator of women’s entrepreneurship in Denmark. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566261111140189
44.
NeffG. (2012). Venture labor: Work and the burden of risk in innovative industries. MIT Press.
45.
OngA. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Duke University Press.
46.
ParkerP. S. (2014). Difference and organizing. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 619–643). Sage.
SteadV. (2017). Belonging and women entrepreneurs: Women’s navigation of gendered assumptions in entrepreneurial practice. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615594413
50.
SvallforsS.HalvorsenK.AndersenJ. (2001). Work orientations in Scandinavia: Employment commitment and organizational commitment in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Acta Sociologica, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/000169901300346882
51.
ThomasR.DaviesA. (2005a). What have feminists done for us? Feminist theory and organizational resistance. Organization, 12(5), 711–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405055945
52.
ThomasR.DaviesA. (2005b). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26(5), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605051821
YepG. A. (2016). Toward thick(er) intersectionalities: Theorizing, researching, and activating the complexities of communication and identities. In SorrellsK.SekimotoS. (Eds.), Globalizing intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 86–94). Sage.
