AggerholmH. K.AsmußB.ThomsenC. (2012). The role of recontextualization in the multivocal, ambiguous process of strategizing. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21, 413-428. doi:10.1177/1056492611430852
2.
BromleyP.PowellW. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. The Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483-530.
3.
BrunssonN. (2002). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Køpenhavn, Denmark: Abstrakt Forlag AS.
4.
CheneyG. (1991). Rhetoric in an organizational society: Managing multiple identities. Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press.
CohenM. D.MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25.
8.
CornelissenJ. (2014). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DeetzS. A.EgerE. K. (2014). Developing a metatheoretical perspective for organizational communication studies. In PutnamL.MumbyD. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 27-48). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
DoorleyJ.GarciaH. F. (2015). Reputation management: The key to successful public relations and corporate communication. London, England: Routledge.
HallahanK.HoltzhausenD.van RulerB.VerčičD.SrirameshK. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3-35.
13.
HatchM. J.SchultzM. (1997). Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 356-365.
14.
JagdS. (2011). Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations. European Journal of Social Theory, 14, 343-359. doi:10.1177/1368431011412349
15.
JarzabkowskiP.SillinceJ. A.ShawD. (2010). Strategic ambiguity as a rhetorical resource for enabling multiple interests. Human Relations, 63, 219-248. doi:10.1177/0018726709337040
16.
KingB.WhettenD. (2008). Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 192-207. doi:10.1057/crr.2008.16
17.
KornbergerM. (2010). Brand society: How brands transform management and lifestyle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
19.
PallasJ.StrannegårdL.JonssonS. (Eds.). (2014). Organizations and the media: Organizing in a mediatized world. London, England: Routledge.
20.
PutnamL. (1987). Contradictions and paradoxes in organization. In ThayerL. (Ed.), Organization–communication: Emerging perspectives (pp. 51-167). New York, NY: Ablex Publishing.
21.
RoperJ.Schoenberger-OrgadM. (2011). State-owned enterprises: Issue of accountability and legitimacy. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 693-709. doi:10.1177/0893318911415598
22.
SchultzD. E.SchultzH. (2003). IMC, the next generation: Five steps for delivering value and measuring returns using marketing communication. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23.
SillinceJ. A. A.BrownA. D. (2009). Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites. Human Relations, 62, 1829-1856. doi:10.1177/0018726709336626
24.
SimonH. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
25.
TorpS. M. (2015). The strategic turn in communication science. In HoltzhausenD.ZerfassA. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 34-52). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.