Targeted recruitment strategies aim to communicate job vacancies to specific groups of job seekers that organizations wish to attract, such as qualified ethnic minorities. Typically, these strategies do not consider how person requirements are communicated in job advertisements and how job seekers from different ethnic groups react to such requirements. Two field experiments among actual job seekers investigated whether the type of required trait and the wording of traits affected ethnic minorities’ job attraction (Study 1, N = 140) and qualified ethnic minorities’ and majorities’ decision to apply (Study 2, N = 130). Findings show that ethnic minority job seekers were less attracted to job ads targeting a trait they have negative meta-stereotypes about. Wording of traits did not moderate this effect. However, ethnic minority job seekers who were qualified for a negatively meta-stereotyped trait decided not to apply when that trait was worded in a dispositional (vs. a behavioral) way.
AllenB. J. (2007). Theorizing communication and race. Communication Monographs, 74, 259-264. doi:10.1080/03637750701393055
2.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340-345. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878
3.
AveryD. R. (2003). Reactions to diversity in recruitment advertising: Are differences Black and White?Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 672-679. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.672
4.
AveryD. R.VolponeS. D.StewartR. W.LuksyteA.HernandezM.MckayP. F.HeblM. R. (2013). Examining the draw of diversity: How diversity climate perceptions affect job-pursuit intentions. Human Resource Management, 52, 175-194. doi:10.1002/hrm.21524
5.
BornM. Ph.TarisT. W. (2010). The impact of wording of employment advertisements on students’ inclination to apply for a job. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 485-202. doi:10.1080/00224540903365422
6.
BuzzanellP. M.LongZ.AndersonL. B.KokiniK.BatraJ. C. (2015). Mentoring in academe: A feminist poststructural lens on stories of women engineering faculty of color. Management Communication Quarterly, 29, 440-457. doi:10.1177/0893318915574311
7.
CasperW. J.WayneJ. H.ManegoldJ. G. (2013). Who will we recruit? Targeting deep- and surface-level diversity with human resource policy advertising. Human Resource Management, 52, 311-332. doi:10.1002/hrm.21530
8.
De CorteW. (2011, June22-24). An integrated decision-aid for shaping recruitment and selection decisions. Paper presented at the EAWOP Small Group Meeting, Athens, Greece.
9.
DerousE.RyanA. M. (2012). Documenting the adverse impact of resume screening: Degree of ethnic identification matters. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 464-474. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12009
10.
de VriesR. E.AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2009). De zes belangrijkste persoonlijkheidsdimensies en de HEXACO Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst [The six most important personality dimensions and the HEXACO Personality Inventory]. Gedrag & Organisatie, 22, 232-274.
11.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Retrieved from http://www.uniformguidelines.com/uniformguidelines.html#129
12.
Federal Public Service Employment, Labor, and Social Dialogue & Unia. (2015). Socio-economische monitoring [Socio-economic monitoring]. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
13.
FenigsteinA.ScheierM. F.BussA. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522-527. doi:10.1037/h0076760
14.
ForbesD. A. (2009). Commodification and co-modification: Explicating Black female sexuality in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 577-613. doi:10.1177/0893318908331322
15.
GardnerW. L.ReithelB. J.CogliserC. C.WalumbwaF. O.FoleyR. T. (2012). Matching personality and organizational culture: Effects of recruitment strategy and the five-factor model on subjective person-organization fit. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 585-622. doi:10.1177/0893318912450663
16.
GardnerW. L.ReithelB. J.FoleyR. T.CogliserC. C.WalumbwaF. O. (2009). Attraction to organizational culture profiles: Effects of realistic recruitment and vertical and horizontal individualism-collectivism. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 437-472. doi:10.1177/0893318908327006
17.
GuionR. M. (2011). Assessment, measurement, and predictions for personnel decisions. East Sussex, UK: Routledge.
18.
HerriotP. (1993). A paradigm bursting at the seams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 371-375. doi:10.1002/job.4030140407
19.
HighhouseS.HoffmanJ. R. (2001). Organizational attraction and job choice. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 16, 37-64.
20.
HighhouseS.ThornburyE. E.LittleI. S. (2007). Social-identity functions of attraction to organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 134-146. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.001
21.
HigueraL. (2001). Adverse impact in personnel selection: The legal framework and test bias. European Psychologist, 6, 103-111. doi:10.1027//1016-9040.6.2.103
22.
IRB Europe/Interfederal Center for Equal Opportunities in Belgium. (2009). Voorstelling van de resultaten van een onderzoek bij bevolkingsgroepen van vreemde origine in België [Presentation of the results of a study with communities from foreign origin in Belgium]. Brussels, Belgium: IRB Europe.
23.
KamansE.GordijnE. H.OldenhuisH.OttenS. (2009). What I think you see is what you get: Influence of prejudice on assimilation to negative meta-stereotypes among Dutch Moroccan teenagers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 842-851. doi:10.1002/ejsp.593
24.
KraichyD.ChapmanD. S. (2014). Tailoring web-based recruiting messages: Individual differences in the persuasiveness of affective and cognitive messages. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 253-268. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9311-z
25.
MolS. T.BornM. Ph.WillemsenM. E.van der MolenH. T.DerousE. (2009). When selection ratios are high: Predicting the expatriation willingness of prospective domestic entry-level job applicants. Human Performance, 22, 1-22. doi:10.1080/08959280802540437
26.
NewmanD. A.JonesK. S.FraleyR. C.LyonJ. S.MullaneyK. M. (2013). Why minority recruiting doesn’t often work, and what can be done about it: Applicant qualifications and the 4-group model of targeted recruiting. In YuK. Y. T.CableD. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of recruitment (pp. 492-526). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
NewmanD. A.LyonJ. S. (2009). Recruitment efforts to reduce adverse impact: Targeted recruiting for personality, cognitive ability, and diversity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 298-317. doi:10.1037/a0013472
28.
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2016). International migration outlook 2016. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/migr_outlook-2016-en
29.
OwuamalamC. K.ZagefkaH. (2014). On the psychological barriers to the workplace: When and why metastereotyping undermines employability beliefs of women and ethnic minorities. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 521-528. doi:10.1037/a0037645
30.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
31.
ProostK.DerousE.SchreursB.HagtvetK. A.De WitteK. (2008). Selection test anxiety: Investigating applicants’ self- vs. other-referenced anxiety in a real selection setting. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 14-26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00405.x
32.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615-630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615b
33.
RubiniM.MenegattiM. (2008). Linguistic bias in personnel selection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 168-181. doi:10.1177/0261927X07313653
34.
SchmidtJ. A.ChapmanD. S.JonesD. A. (2015). Does emphasizing different types of person-environment fit in online job ads influence application behavior and applicant quality? Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 267-282. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9353-x
35.
SeminG. R. (2008). Language puzzles: A prospective retrospective on the linguistic category model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 197-209. doi:10.1177/0261927X07313664
36.
SeminG. R.FiedlerK. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 1-30.
37.
SheskinD. J. (2000). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
41.
TippinsN. T. (2010). Adverse impact in employee selection procedures from the perspective of an organizational consultant. In OuttzJ. L. (Ed.), Adverse impact: Implications for organizational staffing and high stakes selection (pp. 201-225). New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
TylerJ. M.McCulloughJ. D. (2009). Violating prescriptive stereotypes on job resumes: A self-presentational perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 272-287. doi:10.1177/089331890341412
43.
Unia/Ipsos. (2009). Survey: Hoe tolerant zijn Belgen ten opzichte van etnische minderheden [Survey: How tolerant are Belgians towards ethnic minorities?]. Brussels, Belgium: Ipsos.
44.
Van HooftE. A. J.BornM. Ph.TarisT. W.Van der FlierH. (2006). Ethnic and gender differences in applicants’ decision-making processes: An application of the theory of reasoned action. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 156-166. doi:10.111/1/j.1468-2389.2006.00341.x
45.
VorauerJ. D.HunterA. J.MainK. J.RoyS. A. (2000). Meta-stereotype activation: Evidence from indirect measures for specific evaluation concerns experienced by members of dominant groups in intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 690-707. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.690
46.
VorauerJ. D.MainK. J.O’ConnellG. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917-937. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917
47.
WalkerH. J.FeildH. S.GilesW. F.BernerthJ. B. (2008). The interactive effects of job advertisements characteristics and applicant experiences on reactions to recruitment messages. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 619-638. doi:10.1348/096317907X252487
48.
WellsC. C. (2013). Controlling “good science”: Language, national identity, and occupational control in scientific work. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 319-345. doi:10.1177/0893318913485440
49.
WilliamsonI. O.SlayH. S.ShapiroD. L.Shivers-BlackwellS. L. (2008). The effect of explanations on prospective applicants’ reactions to firm diversity practices. Human Resource Management, 47, 311-330. doi:10.1002/hrm.20214
50.
ZedeckS. (2010). Adverse impact: History and evolution. In OuttzJ. L. (Ed.), Adverse impact: Implications for organizational staffing and high stakes selection (pp. 3-27). New York, NY: Routledge.
