BekkersR.WiepkingP. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 924-973. doi:10.1177/0899764010380927
3.
BrunssonN. (2003). The necessary hypocrisy. Thunderbird International Business Review, 8, 205-221. doi:10.1002/tie.5060350102
4.
CheneyG.ChristensenL. T.DaileyS. (2013). Communicating identity and identification in and around organizations. In PutnamL.MumbyD. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 695-716). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
5.
CornelissenJ. P.WernerM. D. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 181-235. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.875669
6.
DeesG. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 321-334. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5
7.
EdwardsM. (2009). Gates, Google, and the ending of global poverty: philanthroca- pitalism and international development. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 14(2), 35–42.
8.
GoffmanE. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
9.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: North Eastern University Press.
10.
GoninM.BesharovM.SmithW.GachetN. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407-442. doi: 10.5840/beq201323327
11.
GrossR. A. (2003). Giving in America: From charity to philanthropy. In FriedmanJ.McGarvieD. (Eds.), Charity, philanthropy, and civility in American history (pp. 29-48). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
HatchM. J.SchultzM. (2003). Bringing the corporation into corporate branding. European Journal of Marketing, 37, 1041-1064. doi:10.1108/03090560310477654
13.
JenkinsonA.SainB.BishopK. (2005). Optimising communications for charity brand management. International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing, 10, 79-92. doi:10.1002/nvsm.14
14.
JohansenT. S.NielsenA. E. (2016). Constructing non-profit identity in the midst of stakeholder complexity. International Studies of Management & Organization, 46, 216-227. doi:10.1080/00208825.2016.1140518
15.
KnoxS.GruarC. (2007). The application of stakeholder theory to relationship marketing strategy development in a non-profit organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 115-135. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9258-3
16.
KnudsenB. T.NielsenA. E. (2013). Acts that matter—An analysis of Kiva. Social Responsibility Journal, 9, 603-621. doi:10.1108/SRJ-01-2012-0001
17.
RitchieR.SwamiS.WeinbergC. (1999). A brand new world for nonprofits. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 4(1), 26-42. doi:10.1002/nvsm.54
18.
StrideH. (2006). An investigation into the values dimensions of branding: Implications for the charity sector. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11, 115-124. doi:10.1002/nvsm.44
19.
StrideH.LeeS. (2007). No logo? No way. Branding in the non-profit sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 23, 107-122. doi:10.1362/026725707X178585
20.
van RielC. (1995). Principles of corporate communication. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.
21.
WæraasA. (2008). Can public sector organizations be coherent corporate brands?Marketing Theory, 8(2), 205-221. doi:10.1177/1470593108093325
22.
WirgauJ.FarleyK.JensenC. (2010). Is business discourse colonizing philanthropy? A critical discourse analysis of (product) RED. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21, 611-630. doi:10.1007/s11266-010-9122-z
