AimeF.HumphreyS.DeRueS. D.PaulJ. B. (2014). The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 327-352. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0756
2.
AustinJ. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BattilanaJ.DoradoS. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 6, 1419-1440. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391
4.
BoxenbaumE.JonssonS. (2008). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 78-98). London, England: SAGE.
5.
BromleyP.PowellW. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. The Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483-530. doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.684462
6.
BrunssonN. (2003). The organization of hypocrisy (2nd ed.). Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
7.
BrunssonN. (2007). The consequences of decision-making. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
CastellóI.EtterM.Årup NielsenF. (2016). Strategies of legitimacy through social media: The networked strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 402-432. doi:10.1111/joms.12145
9.
ChristensenL. T.CheneyG. (2015). Peering into transparency: Challenging ideals, proxies and organizational practices. Communication Theory, 25, 70-90. doi:10.1111/comt.12052
ChristensenL. T.MorsingM.ThyssenO. (2015). Strategic aspirations. In CarrollC. E. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of corporate reputation (pp. 818-821). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
DempseyS. E. (2007). Negotiating accountability within international contexts: The role of bounded voice. Communication Monographs, 74, 311-332. doi:10.1080/03637750701543485
13.
EisenbergE. M. (2007). Strategic ambiguities: Essays on communication, organization, and identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
FensterM. (2006). The opacity of transparency. Iowa Law Review, 91, 885-949.
15.
GreenwoodR.RaynardM.KodeihF.MicelottaE. R.LounsburyM. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317-371. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590299
16.
HaackP.SchoenebornD.WickertC. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33, 815-845. doi:10.1177/0170840612443630
17.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78, 734-749. doi:10.2307/1961840
18.
OrtonD. J.WeickK. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203-223.
19.
PacheA.SantosF. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 972-1001. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0405
20.
SchnackenbergA. K.TomlinsonE. C. (2016). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management, 42, 1784-1810. doi:10.1177/0149206314525202
21.
StarkD. (2009). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
WeickK. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.