BrunerJ. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1-21. doi:10.1086/448619
2.
BurkeK. (1973). The philosophy of literary form (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
DeetzS. (2008). Engagement as co-generative theorizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 289-297. doi:10.1080/00909880802172301
4.
DempseyS. E.BargeJ. K. (2014). Engaged scholarship and democracy. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 665-688). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
FitzgeraldH.BurackC.SeiferS. (2010). Handbook of engaged scholarship: Contemporary landscapes, future directions. Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
6.
MumbyD. K. (1987). The political function of narrative in organizations. Communication Monographs, 54, 113-127. doi:10.1080/03637758709390221
7.
PutnamL. L.DempseyS. E. (2015). The five faces of engaged scholarship: Implications for feminist research. Women & Language, 38, 11-21.
8.
SeiferS. D. (2008). Making the best case for community-engaged scholarship in promotion and tenure review. In MinklerM.WallersteinN. (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 425-430). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.