BrummansB.CoorenF.RobichaudD.TaylorJ. R. (2014). Approaches in research on the communicative constitution of organizations. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication (pp. 173-194). London, England: Sage.
2.
CheongP. H.HwangJ. M.BrummansB. H. (2014). Transnational immanence: The autopoietic co-constitution of a Chinese spiritual organization through mediated communication. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 7-25.
3.
CoorenF. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62, 1-20.
4.
EcheverríaR. (1995). Ontología del lenguaje [Ontology of language]. Santiago, Chile: Dolmen.
5.
FloresF. (1994). Inventando la empresa del siglo XXI [Inventing the XXI century business]. Santiago, Chile: Dolmen.
6.
LuhmannN. (1997). Organización y decisión [Organization and decision]. Barcelona, Spain: Anthropos.
7.
MaturanaH. (1992). La objetividad. Un argumento para obligar [Objectivity. An imperative argument]. Santiago, Chile: Dolmen.
8.
MaturanaH.VarelaF. (1984). El árbol del conocimiento: Las bases biológicas del entendimiento humano [The tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human understanding]. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
9.
MaturanaH.VarelaF. (1994). De máquinas y seres vivos. Autopoiesis: La organización de lo vivo [From machines to living beings. Autopoiesis: The organization of the living]. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria. (Original work published 1974)
10.
MorganG. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
PaulsonW. (1988). The noise as culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
SchoenebornD.BlaschkeS.CoorenF.McPheeR. D.SeidlD.TaylorJ. R. (2014). The three schools of CCO thinking: Interactive dialogue and systematic comparison. Management Communication Quarterly, 28, 285-316.
13.
WinnogradT.FloresF. (1987). Understanding computers and cognition. Norwood, NJ: Addision Wesley.