ArcelorMittal. (2013). The fabric of sustainable growth: Corporate responsibility 2012—Summary report. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: ArcelorMittal S.A.
3.
AriansenP. (1999). Sustainability, morality, and future generations. In LaffertyW. M.LanghelleO. (Eds.), Towards sustainable development: On the goals of development and the conditions of sustainability (pp. 84-96). London, England: McMillan.
BlombäckA.ScandeliusC. (2013). Corporate heritage in CSR communication: A means to responsible brand image?Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18, 362-382. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-07-2012-0048
8.
ChristensenL. T. (2007). The discourse of corporate social responsibility: Postmodern remarks. In MayS. K.CheneyG.RoperJ. (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 448-458). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
ChristensenL. T.MorsingM.ThyssenO. (2011). The polyphony of corporate social responsibility: Deconstructing accountability and transparency in the context of identity and hypocrisy. In CheneyG.MayS.MunshiD. (Eds.), The handbook of communication ethics (pp. 457-474). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ditlev-SimonsenC. D. (2010). From corporate social responsibility awareness to action?Social Responsibility Journal, 6, 452-468. doi:10.1108/17471111011064807
12.
EisenbergE. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242. doi:10.1080/03637758409390197
IhlenØ. (2009a). Business and climate change: The climate response of the world’s 30 largest corporations. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 3, 244-262. doi:10.1080/17524030902916632
20.
IhlenØ. (2009b). The oxymoron of “sustainable oil production”: The case of the Norwegian oil industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 53-63. doi:10.1002/bse.563
21.
IhlenØ.RoperJ. (2014). Corporate reports on sustainability and sustainable development: “We have arrived.”Sustainable Development, 22, 42-51. doi:10.1002/sd.524
22.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis—Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
LeitchS.DavenportS. (2007). Strategic ambiguity as a discourse practice: The role of keywords in the discourse on “sustainable” biotechnology. Discourse Studies, 9, 43-61. doi:10.1177/1461445607072106
24.
LiveseyS. M. (2002). The discourse of the middle ground: Citizen shell commits to sustainable development. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 313-349. doi:10.1177/0893318902153001
25.
LunheimR. (2005). Confessions of a corporate window-dresser. Leading Perspectives, Summer, 6-7.
26.
MilneM. J. (2012). Phantasmagoria, sustain-a-babbling, and the communication of corporate social and environmental accountability. In DavisonJ. L.CraigR. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to accounting communication (pp. 135-153). London, England: Routledge.
27.
MilneM. J.GrubnicS. (2011). Climate change accounting research: Keeping it interesting and different. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24, 948-977. doi:10.1108/09513571111184715
28.
MilneM. J.KearinsK.WaltonS. (2006). Creating adventures in wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13, 801-839. doi:10.1177/1350508406068506
29.
MilneM. J.TregidgaH.WaltonS. (2009). Words not actions! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22, 1211-1257. doi:10.1108/09513570910999292
SpringettD. (2003). Business conceptions of sustainable development: A perspective from critical theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 71-86. doi:10.1002/bse.353