BryantC.JaryD. (2001). Anthony Giddens: A global social theorist. In BrantC.JaryD. (Eds.), The contemporary Giddens (pp. 3-39). New York, NY: Palgrave.
2.
CanaryH. E. (2010a). Constructing policy knowledge: Contradictions, communication, and knowledge frames. Communication Monographs, 77, 181-206.
3.
CanaryH. E. (2010b). Structurating activity theory: An integrative approach to policy knowledge. Communication Theory, 20, 21-49.
4.
CooperR. (1986). Organization/disorganization. Social Science Information, 25, 299-335.
5.
FairhurstG. T.CoorenF.CahillD. J. (2002). Discursiveness, contradiction, and unintended consequences in successive downsizings. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 501-540.
6.
FairhurstG. T.PutnamL. L. (forthcoming). Organizational discourse analysis. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
GiddensA. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
GiddensA. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
10.
HaslettB. B. (2012). Communicating and organizing in context: The theory of structurational interaction. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
HowardL. A.GeistP. (1995). Ideological positioning in organizational change: The dialectic of control in a merging organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 62, 110-131.
12.
KeoughC.LakeR. (1993). Values as structuring properties in contract negotiations. In ConradC. (Ed.), The ethical nexus (pp. 149-170). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13.
KirbyE.KroneK. J. (2002). “The policy exists but you can’t really use it”: Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50-77.
14.
McPheeR. D.CormanS. R. (1995). An activity-based theory of communication networks in organizations, applied to the case of a local church. Communication Monographs, 62, 132-151.
15.
McPheeR. D.PooleM. S.IversonJ. (forthcoming). Structuration theory. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
McPheeR. D.ZaugP. (2000). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(1-2). Available from www.cios.org
17.
MeyersR. A.GarrettD. E. (1993). Contradictions, values, and organizational argument. In ConradC. (Ed.), The ethical nexus (pp. 149-170). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18.
NicoteraA. M.ClinkscalesM. J. (2010). Nurses at the nexus: A case study in structurational divergence. Health Communication, 25, 32-49.
19.
NicoteraA. M.ClinkscalesM. J.WalkerF. R. (2003). Understanding organization through culture and structure: Relational and other lessons from the African-American organization. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
NoranderS.HarterL. M. (2012). Reflexivity in practice: Challenges and potentials of transnational organizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 74-105.
21.
OlufowoteJ. O. (2008). A structurational analysis of informed consent to treatment: Societal evolution, contradiction, and reproductions in medical practice. Health Communication, 23, 292-303.
22.
PooleM. S.DeSanctisG. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In FulkJ.SteinfieldC. (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp.175-195). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
PooleM. S.SeiboldD.McPheeR. (1985). Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 74-102.
24.
ScottC.CormanS.CheneyG. (1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298-336.
25.
SydowJ.WindelerA. (1998). Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organization Science, 9, 265-284.
26.
TretheweyA.AshcraftK. L. (2004). Practicing disorganization: The development of applied perspectives on living with tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 171-181.
27.
WitmerD. (1997). Communication and recovery: Structuration as an ontological approach to organizational culture. Communication Monographs, 64, 324-349.
28.
YatesJ.OrlikowskiW. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-332.