This article examines how those who hold leadership positions in an internationally renowned Taiwanese Buddhist humanitarian organization establish themselves as legitimate authors of their organization by invoking a spiritual leader in their daily interactions and use this invocation to author their organization with a shared sense of compassion and wisdom. In so doing, this article extends the literature on mindful organizing and offers practical insights into the cultivation of mindfulness in an organizational setting. In particular, this study underscores the importance of understanding how a spiritual organization is communicatively constituted by voicing a revered figure into everyday situations, illustrating the profound connections between voice, invocation, and vocation.
AshcraftK. L.MumbyD. (2004). Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Benoit-BarnéC.CoorenF. (2009). The accomplishment of authority through presentification: How authority is distributed among and negotiated by organizational members. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 5-31.
4.
BergJ. M.GrantA. M.JohnsonV. (2010). When callings are calling: Crafting work and leisure in pursuit of unanswered occupational callings. Organization Science, 21, 973-994.
5.
BerzinA. (2000/2010). Wise teacher, wise student: Tibetan approaches to a healthy relationship. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion.
6.
BoströmM. (2006). Regulatory credibility and authority through inclusiveness: Standardization organizations in cases of eco-labelling. Organization, 13, 345-367.
7.
BrummansB. H. J. M. (2011). What goes down must come up: Communication as incarnation and transcension. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8, 194-200.
8.
BrummansB. H. J. M.CoorenF. (2011). Forum: Communication as incarnation. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8, 186-187.
9.
BrummansB. H. J. M.HwangJ. M. (2010). Tzu Chi’s organizing for a compassionate world: Insights into the communicative praxis of a Buddhist organization. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 3, 136-163.
10.
BundersonJ. S.ThompsonJ. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 32-57.
11.
ButlerJ. (1989). Foucault and the paradox of bodily inscriptions. Journal of Philosophy, 86, 601-607.
12.
CalásM.SmircichL. (2003). Introduction: Spirituality, management and organization. Organization, 10, 327-328.
13.
CameronK. S.DuttonJ. E.QuinnR. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
14.
CaseyC. (2004). Bureaucracy re-enchanted? Spirit, experts and authority in organizations. Organization, 11, 59-79.
15.
YenCheng (1993). Still thoughts (Vol. 1, KaobH., Ed., LinC., Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Tzu Chi Cultural Publishing.
16.
YenCheng (1996). Still thoughts (Vol. 2, ShawD., Ed., LiuK., Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Tzu Chi Cultural Publishing.
17.
CheongP. H. (2013). Authority. In CampbellH. (Ed.). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds (pp.72-87). New York, NY: Routledge
18.
CheongP. H.HuangS. H.PoonJ. P. H. (2011a). Religious communication and epistemic authority of leaders in wired faith organizations. Journal of Communication, 61, 938-958.
19.
CheongP. H.HuangS. H.PoonJ. P. H. (2011b). Cultivating online and offline pathways to enlightenment: Religious authority in wired Buddhist organizations. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 1160-1180.
CoorenF. (2006). The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In CoorenF.TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Practical approaches to research into the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 81-100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum.
22.
CoorenF.TaylorJ. R. (1997). Organization as an effect of mediation: Redefining the link between organization and communication. Communication Theory, 7, 219-260.
23.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
DorjeR. (2001). Dangerous friend: The teacher-student relationship in Vajrayana Buddhism. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
25.
EmersonR. E.FretzR. IShawL. L. (1995/2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
26.
FairhurstG. T.CoorenF (2009). Charismatic leadership and the hybrid production of presence(s). Leadership, 5, 1-22.
27.
FarrellT. B. (1993). Norms of rhetorical culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
FayolH. (1916/1949). General and industrial management. London, UK: Pitman.
29.
FinemanS. (2006). On being positive: Concerns and counterpoints. Academy of Management Review, 31, 270-291.
30.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (SheridanA., Trans.). London, UK: Alan Lane.
31.
GilmanG. (1982). An inquiry into the nature and use of authority. In HaireM. (Ed.), Organizational theory in industrial practice (pp. 105-142). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
GrayB. (2007). Ego and identity as barriers to transformative cooperation: Lessons from feminism and Buddhism. In PideritS. K.FryR. E.CooperiderD. L. (Eds.), Handbook of transformative cooperation: New designs and dynamics (pp. 127-150). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
GrossR. M. (1993). Buddhism after patriarchy: A feminist history, analysis, and reconstruction of Buddhism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
34.
HoogenboomM.OssewaardeR. (2005). From iron cage to pigeon house: The birth of reflexive authority. Organization Studies, 26, 601-619.
35.
HuangC. J. (2009). Charisma and compassion: Cheng Yen and the Buddhist Tzu Chi movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
KahnW. A.KramK. E. (1994). Authority at work: Internal models and their organizational consequences. Academy of Management Review, 19, 17-50.
37.
KawamakiC.WhiteJ. B.LangerE. J. (2000). Mindful and masculine: Freeing women leaders from the constraints of gender roles. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 49-63.
38.
KernochanR. A.McCormickD. W.WhiteJ. A. (2007). Spirituality and the management teacher. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 61-75.
39.
LalibertéA. (2003). “Love transcends borders” or “blood is thicker than water”? The charity work of the Compassion Relief Foundation in the People’s Republic of China. European Journal of East Asia Studies, 2, 243-261.
LangerE. (1992). Interpersonal mindlessness and language. Communication Monographs, 59, 324-327.
42.
LangerE. J.MoldoveanuM. (2000a). The construct of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 1-9.
43.
LangerE. J.MoldoveanuM. (2000b). Mindfulness research and the future. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 129-139.
44.
LewisL. (2005). The civil society sector: A review of critical issues and research agenda for organizational communication scholars. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 238-267.
45.
LewisL. K.HamelS. A.RichardsonB. K. (2001). Communicating change to nonprofit stakeholders: Models and predictors of implementers’ approaches. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 5-41.
46.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
LindlofT. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
MurphyJ. M. (2000). Crafting the Kennedy legacy. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 3, 577-601.
O’NeillM. (2010). Tzu Chi: Serving with compassion. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
52.
PeirceC. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce (BuhlerJ., Ed.). New York, NY: Dover.
53.
RobbinsT.LucasP. C. (2007). From “cults” to new religious movements: Coherence, definition and conceptual framing in the study of new religious movements. In BeckfordJ. A.DemerathN. J.III (Eds.), The Sage handbook of the sociology of religion (pp. 227-247). London, UK: Sage.
54.
RoschE. (2008). Beginner’s mind: Paths to the wisdom that is not learned. In FerrariM.PotworowskiG. (Eds.), Teaching for wisdom: Cross-cultural perspectives on fostering wisdom (pp. 135-162). New York, NY: Springer.
55.
RyanG. W.BernhardH. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85-109.
56.
SassJ. (2000). Characterizing organizational spirituality: An organizational communication culture approach. Communication Studies, 51, 195-217.
57.
SchumacherE. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
58.
SennettR. (1980). Authority. New York, NY: Knopf.
59.
SpradleyJ. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
StraussA. L. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, processes, contexts, and social order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
62.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63.
TaylorJ. R. (2011). Organization as an (imbricated) configuring of transactions. Organization Studies, 32, 1273-1294.
64.
TaylorJ. R. (2012, March). Authority as the normative basis of organization. Paper presented at the regional conference of the International Communication Association in Lille, France.
65.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (2011). The situated organization: Case studies in the pragmatics of communication research. New York, NY: Routledge.
66.
TraceyP. (2012). Religion and organization: A critical review of current trends and future directions. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 87-134.
WeberM. (1922/1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology (RothG.WittichC., Eds.). New York, NY: Bedminster.
71.
WeberM. (1947). Theory of social and economic organization (HendersonA.ParsonsT., Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
72.
WeickK. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization: The impermanent organization. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
73.
WeickK. E.PutnamT. (2006). Organizing for mindfulness: Eastern wisdom and Western knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 275-287.
74.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M. (2006). Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science, 17, 514-524.
75.
WrzesniewskiA.McCauleyC. R.RozinP.SchwartzB. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 21-33.
