AhrneG.BrunssonN. (2011). Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. Organization, 18(1), 83-104.
2.
AshcraftK. L.KuhnT. R.CoorenF. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1-64.
3.
AxleyS. R. (1984). Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 428-437.
4.
BlaschkeS. (2008). Structures and dynamics of autopoietic organizations: Theory and simulation. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.
5.
BlaschkeS.SchoenebornD.SeidlD. (2012). Organizations as networks of communication episodes: Turning the network perspective inside out. Organization Studies, 33(8), 879-906.
6.
BuchholzU.KnorreS. (2010). Grundlagen der internen Unternehmenskommunikation [Foundations of internal corporate communications]. Berlin, Germany: Helios.
7.
BurkartR. (2010). Verständigungsorientierte Öffentlichkeitsarbeit [Understanding-oriented public relations]. In HömbergW.HahnD.SchafferT. B. (Eds.), Kommunikation und Verständigung [Communication and understanding] (pp. 17-37). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.
8.
CoorenF. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 1-20.
9.
CoorenF.BrummansB. H. J. M.CharrierasD. (2008). The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Médecins Sans Frontières in action. Human Relations, 61(10), 1339-1370.
10.
CoorenF.FairhurstG. T. (2009). Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In PutnamL. L.NicoteraA. M. (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 117-152). New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
CoorenF.KuhnT. R.CornelissenJ. P.ClarkT. (2011). Communication, organizing, and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149-1170.
12.
CoorenF.TaylorJ. R.van EveryE. J. (Eds.). (2006). Communication as organizing. Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
DongesP. (2008). Medialisierung politischer Organisationen [Mediatization of political organizations]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.
15.
FassauerG. (2012, July4-7). Exploring the moral side of communication as organization: Contributions from Honneth’s notion of the “struggle for recognition.”Proceedings of the European Group of Organizational Studies Colloquium (EGOS), Helsinki/Finland.
16.
GeigerD.SchröderA. (2012, July4-7). Routines as text and conversation: Toward a semantic understanding of organizational routines. Proceedings of the European Group of Organizational Studies Colloquium (EGOS), Helsinki/Finland.
17.
HaackP.SchoenebornD.WickertC. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33(5-6), 813-845.
18.
HabermasJ. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon.
19.
HonnethA. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
KirchnerS. (2013). How organizations become enduring: Disentangling the organizational identity paradox. In SydowJ.SchreyöggG. (Eds.), Self-reinforcing processes in and among organizations (pp. 35-54). Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave.
21.
KoschmannM.KuhnT. R.PfarrerM. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 332-353.
22.
KozicaA.GebhardtC.KaiserS.Müller-SeitzG. (2012, July4-7). Wikipedia’s bureaucratic nightmare: Contradictions and consistency in Wikipedia’s organizational identity. Proceedings of the European Group of Organizational Studies Colloquium (EGOS), Helsinki/Finland.
23.
KuhnT. R. (2008). A communicative theory of the firm: Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationships. Organization Studies, 29(8-9), 1227-1254.
24.
LammersJ. C. (2011). Management Communication Quarterly forum: Institutionalism and organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1) 151-153.
25.
LammersJ. C.BarbourJ. B. (2006). An institutional theory of organizational communication. Communication Theory, 16, 356-377.
26.
LuhmannN. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
LuhmannN. (2000). Organisation und Entscheidung [Organization and decision]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
28.
MastC.HuckS. (2008). Internal communication and leadership. In ZerfassA.van RulerB.SrirameshK. (Eds.), Public relations research (pp. 147-162). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.
29.
McPheeR. D.ZaugP. (2000). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(1-2). Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/010/1/01017.html.
30.
McClellanJ.DeetzS. (2009). Communication and critical management Studies. In WillmottH.BridgmanT.AlvessonM. (Eds.), Handbook of critical management studies (pp. 433-453). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
MongeP. R.ContractorN. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
Müller-CamenM.SalzgeberS. (2005). Changes in academic work and the chair regime: The case of German business administration academics. Organization Studies, 26(2), 271-290.
33.
PalazzoG.SchererA. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71-88.
34.
PutnamL. L.PhillipsN.ChapmanP. (1996). Metaphors of communication and organizations. In CleggS. R.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 375-408). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
QuandtT.ScheufeleB. (Eds.). (2011). Ebenen der Kommunikation. Mikro-Meso-Makro-Links in der Kommunikationswissenschaft [Levels of communication: Micro-meso-macro links in communication studies]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.
36.
RobichaudD.GirouxH.TaylorJ. R. (2004). The metaconversation: The recursive property of language as a key to organizing. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 617-634.
37.
SandhuS. (2009). Strategic communication: An institutional perspective. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(2), 72-92.
38.
SchererA. G.PalazzoG. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899-931.
SchoenebornD. (2008). Alternatives considered but not disclosed: The ambiguous role of Power-Point in cross-project learning. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.
41.
SchoenebornD. (2011). Organization as communication: A Luhmannian perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 663-689.
42.
SchoenebornD.SchererA. G. (2012). Clandestine organizations, al Qaeda, and the paradox of (in) visibility: A response to Stohl and Stohl. Organization Studies, 33(8), 963-971.
43.
SchultzF.WehmeierS. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 9-29.
44.
SeidlD.BeckerK. H. (Eds.). (2005). Niklas Luhmann and organization studies. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
45.
SillinceJ. A. A. (2010). Can CCO theory tell us how organizing is distinct from markets, networking, belonging to a community, or supporting a social movement?Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 132-138.
SteinmannH. (Ed.). (1978). Betriebswirtschaftslehre als normative Handlungswissenschaft. Zur Bedeutung der konstruktiven Wissenschaftstheorie für die Betriebswirtschaftslehre [Business administration as a normative behavioral science. On the importance of the constructive theory of science for business administration]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
48.
TaylorJ. R. (2009). Organizing from the bottom up? Reflections on the constitution of organization in communication. In PutnamL. L.NicoteraA. M. (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 153-186). New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
TaylorJ. R.CoorenF.GirouxH.RobichaudD. (1996). The communicational basis of organization: Between the conversation and the text. Communication Theory, 6(1), 1-39.
50.
TaylorJ. R.van EveryE. J. (2000). The emergent organization. Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
Theis-BerglmairA. M. (2003). Organisationskommunikation: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Forschungen [Organizational communication: Theoretical foundations and empirical research] (2nd ed.). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
52.
Theis-BerglmairA. M. (2009). Nachrichtenselektion und Leserfeedback: Ein kontingenzorientierter Ansatz zur Analyse von Redaktionen als Organisationen [News selection and reader feedback: A contingency-oriented approach to the analysis of editorial offices as organizations]. Medien & Kommunikationwissenschaft, 57(3), 316-335.
53.
WeberM. (1949). Objectivity in social science and social policy. In ShilsE. A.FinchH. A. (Eds.), The methodology of the social sciences (pp. 49-112). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1904)
54.
WederF. (2010). Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations [Organizationalcommunication and public relations]. Vienna, Austria: Facultas.