Communication-Centered Approaches in German Management Research

Austin J. (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

Benders J. Bijsterveld M. v. (2000). Leaning on lean: The reception of a management fashion in Germany. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15, 50-65.

Bort S. Kieser A. (2011). Fashion in organization theory: An empirical analysis of the diffusion of theoretical concepts. Organization Studies, 32, 655-681.

Cooren F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Eckert N. (1998). Unternehmensentwicklung und Ökologie des Wissens–der Primat impliziten Wissens und seine Implikationen für eine evolutionäre Organisationstheorie [Corporate development and the ecology of knowledge - the primacy of implicit knowledge and its implications for an evolutionary theory of the organization]. Herrsching, Germany: Kirsch.

Ernst B. Kieser A. (2002). In search of explanations for the consulting explosion. In Engwall L. Sahlin-Andersson K. (Eds.), The expansion of management knowledge: Carriers, flows, and sources (pp. 47-73). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Foucault M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. London, UK: Routledge.

Foucault M. (1991). Governmentality. In Burchell G. Gordon C. Miller P. (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Galtung J. (1981). Structure, culture, and intellectual style: An essay comparing saxonic, teutonic, gallic and nipponic approaches. Social Science Information, 20, 817-856.

Habermas J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1): Reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Habermas J. (1987). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 2): Lifeworld and system. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Hartz R. (2009). Die sprachliche Inszenierung von Konsens in Organisationen: Qualitative Befunde zu Mitarbeiterzeitungen [The linguistic staging of consensus in organizations: Findings of a qualitative study of company magazines]. In Habscheid S. Knobloch C. (Eds.), Einigkeitsdiskurse: Zur Inszenierung von Konsens in organisationaler und öffentlicher Kommunikation [Discourses of consensus: On the staging of consensus in public and private communication] (pp. 177-206). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.

Hartz R. Kranz O. Steger T. (2009a). Der Mitarbeiter als Kapitaleigner. Bilder und Projektionen eines gesellschaftlichen Diskurses [The employee as equity owner: images and projections of a societal discourse]. Berlin, Germany: Sigma.

Hartz R. Kranz O. Steger T. (2009b). Der Arbeitnehmer im Diskurs der Mitarbeiterkapitalbeteiligung–eine semantische Sekundäranalyse [The role of the employee in the discourse on employee ownership - a secondary analysis of semantics]. Industrielle Beziehungen [Industrial Relations], 16, 327-348.

Hendry J. Seidl D. (2003). The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 175-196.

Jablin F. Putnam L. (2001) The new handbook of organizational communication : Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kieser A. (1997). Myth and rhetoric in management fashion. Organization, 4, 49-74.

Kieser A. (2002). On communication barriers between management science, consultancies and business companies. In Clark T. Fincham R. (Eds.), Critical consulting (pp. 206-227). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Kieser A. (2011). Between rigour and relevance: Coexisting institutional logics in the field of management science. Society and Economy, 33, 237-247.

Kieser A. Leiner L. (2009). Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 516-533.

Kieser A. Leiner L. (2012). Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative research. Journal of Management Studies, 21, 14-28.

Kieser A. Nicolai A. (2005). Success factor research: Overcoming the trade-off between rigor and relevance? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 275-279.

Kieser A. Wellstein B. (2007). Do activities of consultants and management scientists affect decision making by managers? In Starbuck W. H. Hodgkinson G. P. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of organizational decision making (pp. 495-516). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Kirsch W. (1992), Kommunikatives Handeln, Autopoiese, Rationalität [Communicative action, autopoiesis, rationality]. Herrsching, Germany: Kirsch.

Kirsch W. Knyphausen D. zu (1991). Unternehmungen als ‚autopoietische Systeme‘? [Firms as ‘autopoietic systems’?] In Staehle W.H. Sydow J. (Eds.), Managementforschung [Management Research] (pp. 75-101). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.

Kirsch W. Knyphausen D. zu (1993). Gibt es in betriebswirtschaftlichen Organisationen ein verständigungsorientiertes Handeln? [Is there communicative action in business organizations?] Die Betriebswirtschaft [Business Administration], 53, 221-234.

Kirsch W. Seidl D. van Aaken D. (2009). Unternehmensführung. Eine evolutionäre Perspektive [Management: an evolutionary perspective]. Stuttgart, Germany: Schäffer-Poeschel.

Kirsch W. Seidl D. van Aaken D. (2010). Evolutionäre Organisationstheorie [An evolutionary theory of the organization]. Stuttgart, Germany: Schäffer-Poeschel.

Knyphausen D. zu (1992). Paradoxien und Visionen: Visionen einer paradoxen Theorie der Entstehung des Neuen [Paradoxes and visions: Visions of a paradoxical theory of the genesis of novelty]. In Rusch G. Schmidt S. J. (Eds.), DELFIN–Konstruktivismus: Geschichte und Anwendung [DELFIN-Constructivism: History and application] (pp. 140-159). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.

Koschmann M. Kuhn T. R. Pfarrer M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 332-354.

Kuhn T. (2008). A communicative theory of the firm: Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationships. Organization Studies, 29, 1227-1254.

Mohe M. Seidl D. (2011). Theorizing the client-consultant relationship from the perspective of social-systems theory. Organization, 18, 3-22.

Nicolai A. (2004). The bridge to the real “world”: Applied science fiction or a “schozophrenic tour de force”? Journal of Management Studies, 41, 951-976.

Nicolai A. Seidl D. (2010). That’s relevant! Different forms of practical relevance in management science. Organization Studies, 27, 1257-1285.

Ortmann G. (2004). Als ob. Fiktionen des Organisierens [As if. Fictions of organizing]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.

Ortmann G. (2011). Die Kommunikations-und die Exkommunikationsmacht in und von Organisationen [The power of communication and ex-communication in and of organizations]. Die Betriebswirtschaft [Business Administration], 71, 355-378.

Ortmann G. Seidl D. (2010). Strategy research in the German context: The influence of economic, sociological, and philosophical traditions. Advances in Strategic Management, 27, 353-387.

Palazzo G. Scherer A. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71-88.

Putnam L. L. Phillips N. Chapman P. (1996). Metaphors of communication and organizations. In Clegg S. R. Nord W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 375-408). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rasche A. Behnam M. (2009). As if it were relevant. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 243-255.

Scherer A. Palazzo G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility. business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096-1120.

Schmickl C. Kieser A. (2008). How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations? Research Policy, 37, 1148-1163.

Schoeneborn D. (2011) Organization as communication: A Luhmannian perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 663-689.

Seidl D. (2005) Organisational Identity and Self-transformation. An Autopoietic Perspective. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

Seidl D. (2007). General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: A systemic-discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 28, 197-218.

Seidl D. (2009). Productive misunderstandings between organisation science and organisation practice: The science-practice relation from the perspective of Niklas Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic systems. In Magalhaes R. Sanchez R. (Eds.), Autopoiesis in organization theory and practice (pp. 133-148). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

Seidl D. Becker K. H. (2006). Organisations as distinction generating and processing systems. Niklas Luhmann’s contribution to organisation studies. Organization, 13, 9-35.

Star S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Huhns M. Gasser L. (Eds.), Readings in distributed artificial intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: Kaufman.

Wittgenstein L. (2001) Philosophical investigations. (3rd ed.), Oxford, UK: Blackwell.