This article offers reflections and insights on Management Communication Quarterly from a younger scholar in the field of organizational communication. After providing a brief history of the journal, topics of internationality, interdisciplinarity, and identity are explored. This is followed by a discussion among other “emerging scholars” in the field of organizational communication about these topics. The article concludes with a discussion about the role and format of Management Communication Quarterly in the digital age.
AshcraftK.KuhnT.CoorenF. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1-64.
HendersonL. S. (1987). The contextual nature of interpersonal communication in management theory and research. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(1), 7-31.
4.
HoskissonR. E.EdenL.LauC. M.WrightM. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 249-267.
5.
MillerK. I. (2007). Steps (and missteps?) during the adolescence ofMCQ. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(4), 437-443.
6.
MumbyD. K.StohlC. (1996). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(1), 50-72.
7.
PutnamL. L.PhillipsN.ChapmanP. (1996). Metaphors of communication and organization. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. R. (Eds.), Managing organizations: Current issues (pp. 375-408). London: SAGE.
8.
ReddingW. C. (1985). Stumbling toward identity: The emergence of organizational communication as a field. In McPheeR. D.TompkinsP. K. (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions (pp. 15-53). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
9.
RooneyD.McKennaB.BarkerJ. (2011). History of ideas in Management Communication Quarterly. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 583-611
10.
RussoT. C. (1998). Organizational and professional identification: A case of newspaper journalists. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(1), 72-111.
11.
StohlC.CheneyG. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 349-407.
