This study addresses the paradoxical demands of a hoax perpetrated through social media that require an organization to make a substantial response to an unsubstantiated claim. Dominos’ response to its 2009 YouTube crisis is used as a case study to demonstrate how this paradoxical challenge can be resolved by publicly casting the crisis as a learning opportunity. Analysis reveals that learning manifests in observable actions that further emphasize a commitment to the values and norms the organization originally met to earn social legitimacy prior to the crisis. Also, responding to a hoax through the same medium by which it was distributed is imperative to counter the hoax message for the same audience that received it.
BaumJ. A. C.OliverC. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 187-218. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2393353
2.
BennettL. (2003). New media power: The Internet and global activism. In CouldryN.CurranJ. (Eds.), Contesting media power: Alternative media in a networked world (pp. 17-38). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
3.
BitektineA. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151-179. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.5566257210.5465/AMR.2011.55662572
BoydJ. (2000). Actional legitimation: No crisis necessary. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(4), 341-353. doi: 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1204_310.1207/S1532754XJPRR1204_3
6.
BoydJ. (2009). 756*: The legitimacy of a baseball number. In HeathR. L.TothE. L.WaymerD. (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations II (pp. 154-169). New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BrummerJ. J. (1991). Corporate responsibility and legitimacy: An interdisciplinary analysis. New York, NY: Greenwood.
CoombsW. T. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis-response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(4), 447-476. doi: 10.1177/089331899500800400310.1177/0893318995008004003
12.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 165-186. doi: 10.1177/08933180223723310.1177/089331802237233
13.
DeephouseD. L.CarterS. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329-360. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x
14.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101
ElsbachK. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57-88. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2393494
24.
ElsonL. G. (2010). Paradox lost: A cross-contextual definition of levels of abstraction. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
25.
FinetD. (1993). Effects of boundary spanning communication on the sociopolitical delegitimation of an organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 7(1), 36-66. doi: 10.1177/089331899300700100310.1177/0893318993007001003
HarrellJ.WareB. L.LinkugelW. A. (1975). Failure of apology in American politics: Nixon on Watergate. Speech Monographs, 42(4), 245-261. doi: 10.1080/0363775750937590110.1080/03637757509375901
32.
HarterL. M.KroneK. J. (2001). The boundary-spanning role of a cooperative support organization: Managing the paradox of stability and change in non-traditional organizations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(3), 248-277. doi: 10.1080/0090988012811110.1080/00909880128111
33.
HearitK. M. (1995). “Mistakes were made”: Organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacy. Communication Studies, 46, 1-17. doi: 10.1511/2008.73.380210.1511/2008.73.3802
34.
HeathR. L.MillarD. P. (2004). A rhetorical approach to crisis communication: Management, communication processes, and strategic responses. In MillarD. P.HeathR. L. (Eds.), Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication (pp. 1-17).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
MaguireS.HardyC. (2009). Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 148-178. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.3646199310.5465/AMJ.2009.36461993
43.
MazzaC. (1999). Claim, intent, and persuasion: Organizational legitimacy and the rhetoric of corporate mission statements. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
44.
McGuireR. R. (1977). Speech acts, communicative competence and the paradox of authority. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(1), 30-45. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40237010
45.
MetzlerM. B.(2001). The centrality of organizational legitimacy to public relations practice. In HeathR. L. (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 321-334).Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE.
46.
PerryD. C.TaylorM.DoerfelM. L. (2003). Internet-based communication in crisis management. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(2), 206-232. doi: 10.1177/089331890325622710.1177/0893318903256227
47.
PorterL.GolanG. J. (2006). From subservient chickens to brawny men: A comparison of viral advertising to television advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 30-38. Retrieved from http://jiad.org/article78
48.
PowellW. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183-203). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
RaoH. (2004). Institutional activism in the early American automobile industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 359-384. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00036-310.1016/S0883-9026(03)00036-3
50.
RhodesT. D. (1994). The Dominos pizza crisis: Can the company still deliver?North Dakota Journal of Speech and Theatre, 8, 43-55.
51.
SeegerM. W. (1986). The Challenger tragedy and search for legitimacy. Central States Speech Journal, 37, 147-157.
52.
SeegerM. W.SellnowT. L.UlmerR. R. (1998). Communication, organization, and crisis. Communication Yearbook, 21, 281-275.
53.
SellnowT. L.LittlefieldR. S.VidoloffK. G.WebbE. M. (2009). The interacting arguments of risk communication in response to terrorist hoaxes. Argumentation and Advocacy, 45(3), 139-154.
SonparK.PazzagliaF.KornijenkoJ. (2010). The paradox and constraints of legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0344-110.1007/s10551-009-0344-1
56.
StohlC.CheneyG. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communicating and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 349-407. doi: 10.1177/089331890114300110.1177/0893318901143001
57.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/258788
SwainK. A. (2007). Outrage factors and explanations in news coverage of the anthrax attacks. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 335-352.
UlrichP. (1995). Introduction. In UlrichP.SarasinC. (Eds.), Facing public interest: The ethical challenge to business policy and corporate communications (pp. 1-8). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
62.
VeilS. R.BuehnerT.PalencharM. (2011). A work in-progress literature review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 19(2), 1-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00639.x10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00639.x
ZimmermanM. A.ZeitzG. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414-431. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4134387
