Barley, Stephen R.1986. "Technology As an Occassion for Structuring: Evidence From Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments."Administrative Science Quarterly, 31,78-108.
2.
Barley, S.R. ( 2008). Coalface institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Anderson (Eds.). Handbook of organizational instituitionalism (pp. 490-515). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Bechky, B.A. ( 2003a). Object lessons: Workplace artifacts and occupational jurisdiction. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 720-752.
4.
Bechky, B.A. ( 2003b). Sharing meaning across occupational communities. Organization Science, 14, 312-330.
5.
Bendix, R. ( 1956). Work and authority in industry: Ideologies of management in the course of industrialization. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
6.
Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. ( 1967). The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Doubleday.
7.
Edelman, L.B. ( 1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology , 97, 1531-1576.
8.
Edelman, L.B. ( 1999). The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance procedures as rational myth. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 406-454.
9.
Edelman, L.B., Fuller, S.R., & Mara-Drita, I. (2001). Diversity, rhetoric and the managerialization of law. American Journal of Sociology , 106, 1589-1641.
10.
Garfinkel, H. ( 1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Giddens, A. ( 1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley : University of California Press.
12.
Hallett, T., & Ventresca, M.J. (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theoretical Sociology, 35, 213-236.
13.
Heritage, J. ( 1993). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. London , UK: Blackwell.
14.
Hughes, E.C. ( 1971). Going concerns: The study of American institutions. In E. C. Hughes (Ed.), The sociological eye (pp. 52-64). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
15.
Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca B. ( 2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Orlikowski, W.J. ( 1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 398-427.
17.
Orlikowski, W.J. ( 2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404-428.
18.
Powell, W.W., & Colyvas, J.A. ( 2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational instituitionalism (pp. 490-515). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Smith, M.A. ( 2000). American business and political power: Public opinion, elections and democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Star, S.L., & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology: ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
21.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication media . Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-326.
