Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. ( 2008). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 78-98). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
Davis, G.F. ( 1991). Agents without principles: The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 583-618.
3.
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. ( 1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
4.
Erkama, N., & Vaara, E. ( 2010). Struggles over legitimacy in global organizational restructuring: A rhetorical perspective on legitimation strategies and dynamics in a shutdown case. Organization Studies, 31, 813-839.
5.
Green, S.D. ( 2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29, 653-669.
6.
Havelock, E.A. ( 1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Haveman, H.1993. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 593-627.
8.
Innis, H.A. ( 1949). The bias of communication. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 15, 457-476.
9.
Innis, H.A. ( 1950). Paper and the printing press. In Empire and communications (pp. 142-170). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
10.
Lasswell, H. ( 1948). The structure and function of communication in society . In Lyman Bryson (Ed), The communication of ideas (pp. 37-51). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
11.
Lawrence, T.B., & Suddaby, R. ( 2006). Institutional Work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215-254). London, UK : SAGE.
12.
Lawrence, T.B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. ( 2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work . In T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional Work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp.1-27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
McCluhan, M. ( 1951). The mechanical bride: The folklore of industrial man . New York, NY: Vanguard Press.
14.
McCluhan, M. ( 1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
15.
Meyer, R., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities. A managerial challenge to Public Administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1000-1014.
16.
Özen, S., & Berkman, Ü. (2007). Cross-national reconstruction of managerial practices: TQM in Turkey. Organization Studies , 28, 825-851.
17.
Rogers, E.M.1995. The Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.), New York: Free Press.
18.
Sillince, J., & Suddaby, R. ( 2008). Organizational rhetoric: Bridging management & communication scholarship. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 5-12.
19.
Strang, D., & Meyer, J.W. ( 1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22, 487-511.
20.
Suddaby, R. ( 2010). Challenging institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14-20.
21.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. ( 2005). Rhetorical Strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35-67.
22.
Tolbert, P.S., & Zucker, L.G. ( 1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 22-39.
23.
Weaver, W., & Shannon, C.E. ( 1963). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana-Champagne, IL: University of Illinois Press.
24.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media . Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-326.
